Jack, We all know the FDA boys tell common folk that they'll get nasty argyria for sure if they take CS, but approach them and drug industry types as if you've got deep pockets, with money to invest. Then they'll tell you that CS is a 'broad spectrum anit-microbial." I'd imagine that the number 650 does not come from any kind of exhaustive research on CS and each and every ailment, rather referring to how many ailments are caused by primitive microbes, of the variety so responsive to treatment by CS. Reid
In my research about CS the number 650 has repeatedly been linked to CS and it's ability to have an effect on that many ailments. >From a reference in a magazine dated 3/'78: Science Digest suggested an answer to all of these catastrophic problems back in March of 1978 in an article titled "Our Mightiest Germ Fighter". This article by Jim Powell stated: "Thanks to eye-opening research, silver is emerging as a wonder of modern medicine. An antibiotic kills perhaps a half-dozen different disease organisms, but silver kills some 650. Resistant strains fail to develop. Moreover, silver is virtually non-toxic." Where did this number come from? Was there a smaller number prior to 1978? The unsupported reference to 650 "disease organisms" can allow a solid base from which the nonbeliever/antagonist can attack. Any one want a shot at this? PLEASE. Jack -- The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver. Instructions for unsubscribing may be found at: http://silverlist.org To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html List maintainer: Mike Devour <mdev...@eskimo.com>
