!
Steven Geigle
Cedar Mill, Oregon, USA
sgei...@home.com
- Original Message -
Subject: Re: CS>Re: Documented CS Successes under Controlled Conditions
> They are Robert Becker, and Bob Beck, two completely different
individuals.
>
> Marshall
>
> "Jason R. Eaton"
-list@eskimo.com
Date: Monday, April 17, 2000 10:48 AM
Subject: Re: CS>Re: Documented CS Successes under Controlled Conditions
>They are Robert Becker, and Bob Beck, two completely different individuals.
>
>Marshall
>
>"Jason R. Eaton" wrote:
>
>> That's
> From: Marshall Dudley
> To:
> Sent: Friday, April 07, 2000 4:55 PM
> Subject: Re: CS>Re: Documented CS Successes under Controlled Conditions
>
> > "Jason R. Eaton" wrote:
> >
> > > Great idea Steve, however:
> > >
> > > We might
he strictess observance of natural law.
>
>- Original Message -----
>From: Ted Windsor
>To:
>Sent: Friday, April 07, 2000 4:29 PM
>Subject: Re: CS>Re: Documented CS Successes under Controlled Conditions
>
>
>> The FDA can reclassify any thing, but this does no
closely is data performed by
those with no vested financial interest, that are non-promotional in nature.
- Original Message -
From: Marshall Dudley
To:
Sent: Friday, April 07, 2000 4:55 PM
Subject: Re: CS>Re: Documented CS Successes under Controlled Conditions
> "Jason R. Eato
On Fri, 07 Apr 2000 09:29:04 -0700, Ted Windsor wrote:
>The FDA can reclassify any thing, but this does not mean it cannot be
>challanged
>in a court of law. You have the God given right to defend yourself from those
>who try to take your rights away. You are also given the right of choice.
>Bl
bservance of natural law.
- Original Message -
From: Ted Windsor
To:
Sent: Friday, April 07, 2000 4:29 PM
Subject: Re: CS>Re: Documented CS Successes under Controlled Conditions
> The FDA can reclassify any thing, but this does not mean it cannot be
challanged
> in a court o
"Jason R. Eaton" wrote:
> Great idea Steve, however:
>
> We might be hard pressed to come to agreement on a uniform document. For
> instance, many believe that CS alone is a fine treatment for acne. However,
> some of us believe quite the opposite. In cases of true acne, the problem
> is not in
In a message dated 00-04-07 12:33:19 EDT, you write:
<< The FDA can reclassify any thing, but this does not mean it cannot be
challanged
in a court of law. You have the God given right to defend yourself from those
who try to take your rights away. You are also given the right of choice.
Bles
From: Steve geigle
To:
Sent: Friday, April 07, 2000 3:49 PM
Subject: Re: CS>Re: Documented CS Successes under Controlled Conditions
> Great idea, Roger. Say, why can't members of the silver list somehow
> produce a document explaining the benefits of CS and make it available at
n
Ted Windsor wrote:
> The FDA can reclassify any thing, but this does not mean it cannot be
> challanged
> in a court of law. You have the God given right to defend yourself from those
> who try to take your rights away. You are also given the right of choice.
> Blessings
> Ted
As they say "God
r, colloidal silver is still
> protected under the Vitamin and Mineral Suppliment Act. And so, the bottom
> line: CS can be sold as such without any medical claims.
>
> - Original Message -
> From: Ted Windsor
> To:
> Sent: Friday, April 07, 2000 2:45 PM
> Subject:
silver is still
protected under the Vitamin and Mineral Suppliment Act. And so, the bottom
line: CS can be sold as such without any medical claims.
- Original Message -
From: Ted Windsor
To:
Sent: Friday, April 07, 2000 2:45 PM
Subject: Re: CS>Re: Documented CS Successes under Control
, USA
sgei...@home.com
- Original Message -
From:
To:
Sent: Friday, April 07, 2000 8:01 AM
Subject: Re: CS>Re: Documented CS Successes under Controlled Conditions
> Thaks very much Marshall. I'm sure a combined effort from the "CS list"
would
> yield several times
### I suspect this might be the case in the new flu spray "as seen on TV".
KD'C
At 11:26 PM 4/6/00 -0600, you wrote:
>Hi Roger,
>
>1. Contact BYU in Utah.
>2. Search for "Argentum Research", and there contact Dr. Bart A. Flick.
>
>There is much going on, quietly. It really is a hot potato for
Thaks very much Marshall. I'm sure a combined effort from the "CS list" would
yield several times more published CS results. Perhaps we could request each
list subscriber to contribute at least one published positive or negatve
(which would be at least as interesting) CS report.
Roger Altman
My understanding is that anything used pre- 1935, the FDA cannot rule against
it,
this does not mean that they won't try to use scare tactics and intimidation, I
would not be afraid to go to court at any time to defend my rights against any
government.
Blessings
Ted
rogalt...@aol.com wrote:
> Te
rogalt...@aol.com wrote:
> Dear List:
>
> Many, if not most of us are convinced that CS works for a wide range of
> medical problems, but can anyone provide documented successes under
> controlled conditions?
>
> Surely some renegade university professor somewhere has, on occasion, been
> curious
Ted:
I wonder how your "read" of FDA action (or inaction) with regard to CS vendor
claims (or even "non-claims") stacks up against their most recent ruling?
Roger
--
The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver.
To join or quit silver-list or silver-digest send an e
Hi Roger,
1. Contact BYU in Utah.
2. Search for "Argentum Research", and there contact Dr. Bart A. Flick.
There is much going on, quietly. It really is a hot potato for the
FDA-protected chemical cartels. Bruce Marx says he suspects they are
putting it in products but not mentioning that it i
Colloidal Silver fall under what is called a grandfather clause, in other words
it is pre 1935, unless someone is making outrages claims the FDA will for the
most part leave you alone.
Blessing
Ted
rogalt...@aol.com wrote:
> Dear List:
>
> Many, if not most of us are convinced that CS works for a
21 matches
Mail list logo
