Matt: I need to think about all of this more. In the meantime, determinism may
not be dead. See, http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0212095v1 and
http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0703179v2.
Eric B. Ramsay
Matt Mahoney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
--- "Eric B. Ramsay" wrote:
> Matt: I understand
--- Gifting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > There is plenty of physical evidence that the universe is simulated by
> > a
> > finite state machine or a Turing machine.
> >
> > 1. The universe has finite size, mass, and age, and resolution
> > etc.
> >
> > -- Matt Mahoney, [EMAIL PROTECT
--- "Eric B. Ramsay" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Matt: I understand your point #2 but it is a grand sweep without any detail.
> To give you an example of what I have in mind, let's consider the photon
> double slit experiment again. You have a photon emitter operating at very
> low intensity suc
There is plenty of physical evidence that the universe is simulated by
a
finite state machine or a Turing machine.
1. The universe has finite size, mass, and age, and resolution
etc.
-- Matt Mahoney, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I assume there is also plenty of evidence that the universe is not
