Doken, Serhad wrote:
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu [mailto:sip-
>> implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu] On Behalf Of Maxim Sobolev
>> Sent: Friday, January 09, 2009 12:19 PM
>> To: Dale Worley
>> Cc: sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbi
> -Original Message-
> From: sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu [mailto:sip-
> implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu] On Behalf Of Maxim Sobolev
> Sent: Friday, January 09, 2009 12:19 PM
> To: Dale Worley
> Cc: sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
> Subject: Re: [Sip-im
On Fri, 2009-01-09 at 12:19 -0800, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> > I is *allowed*, but as you think, it means that there are two separate
> > media streams (both of which are to be sent to port 5010. If the UA
> > that is generating the SDP does not intend to specify two separate media
> > streams, the U
Dale Worley wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-01-08 at 10:21 -0800, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
>> We have come over to a device that generates "strange" SDP. Basically,
>> it splits the same media description into two separate media section. As
>> a result our software considers it as two separate streams, not as
On Thu, 2009-01-08 at 10:21 -0800, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> We have come over to a device that generates "strange" SDP. Basically,
> it splits the same media description into two separate media section. As
> a result our software considers it as two separate streams, not as one
> which it apparent
erol turac wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> thank you for valuable responses.
>
> According to Paul, Proxies MUST NOT modify SDP in INVITE, but SBC CAN do
> it, It depends on implementation.
>
> So, in SBC case with NAT traversal feature, if 2 c= lines exist in SDP,
> 1 at session level and 1 at
Hello All,
thank you for valuable responses.
According to Paul, Proxies MUST NOT modify SDP in INVITE, but SBC CAN do it,
It depends on implementation.
So, in SBC case with NAT traversal feature, if 2 c= lines exist in SDP, 1
at session level and 1 at media level, what is the correct behaviour
Thanks for the reply to all, seems it was an easy question due to the
number of replies I got :-)
I will give it a try!
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 11:29 AM, Michael Procter wrote:
> Aleksander Morgado wrote:
>> Hi there,
>>
>> My proxy is forwarding a SIP MESSAGE to the end user, which has the
>> fo
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 11:21 AM, Aleksander Morgado
wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> My proxy is forwarding a SIP MESSAGE to the end user, which has the
> following contents:
>
> MESSAGE sip:555335...@domain.com SIP/2.0
> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.100.94;branch=z9hG4bK.9Uv96pr9jv6j852j3HD2aSSUFe
> Via: SIP/2
Aleksander Morgado wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> My proxy is forwarding a SIP MESSAGE to the end user, which has the
> following contents:
>
> MESSAGE sip:555335...@domain.com SIP/2.0
> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.100.94;branch=z9hG4bK.9Uv96pr9jv6j852j3HD2aSSUFe
> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 88.30.142.86;branch=z9hG4bK
Hi there,
My proxy is forwarding a SIP MESSAGE to the end user, which has the
following contents:
MESSAGE sip:555335...@domain.com SIP/2.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.100.94;branch=z9hG4bK.9Uv96pr9jv6j852j3HD2aSSUFe
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 88.30.142.86;branch=z9hG4bKpl9r8q
Max-Forwards: 70
From: Shell ;tag
Basically using the nonce and the shared secret key (key shared between the
Auc and the UE), UE generates the response for the challenge as mentioned in
the other mail. Nonce again contains authentiaction token and the random
challenge (RAND) (plus some optional server specific data) generated by t
12 matches
Mail list logo
