Hello,
We do have a wide variety of IPv6 commercial suites. It would be best to
take this off line from the the mailing list, I just don't want to seem
like I am spamming the list with sales inquiries. :-)
If you would like more information on our test suites you can email me
directly or i...@co
Hi Paul,
I got a doubt by seeing the RFC 3261 section 19.1.1.
Thanks for the explanation.
Regards,
Sreenath
From: Paul Kyzivat
To: Sreenath Kulkarni
Cc: sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Sent: Tuesday, 23 June, 2009 9:54:37 AM
Subject: Re: [Sip-implemen
Do you have any equivalent for IPV6?
-Original Message-
From: sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu
[mailto:sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu] On Behalf Of ext
Joshua Morin
Sent: Friday, June 19, 2009 10:57 AM
To: Jun Yin
Cc: Ari Takanen; sip-implementors@lists.cs.
2009/6/23 Sudhir Kumar Reddy :
> thanks folks for detailed info. can we consider following P-Asserted-identity
> Header
>
> P-Asserted-Identity: "Cullen Jennings" ; urip=1234
>
> or should we consider following
>
> P-Asserted-Identity: "Cullen Jennings"
>
> Any response / reference is higly appr
thanks folks for detailed info. can we consider following P-Asserted-identity
Header
P-Asserted-Identity: "Cullen Jennings" ; urip=1234
or should we consider following
P-Asserted-Identity: "Cullen Jennings"
Any response / reference is higly appreciated
Thanks in advance
Sudhir
Linking of registration to authorization of sessions is an IMS concept.
You will need to ask this question in some IMS forum.
As far as IETF is concerned, the presence, coming, or going of
registrations has *no* bearing on extablished sessions, or on the
ability to establish new sessions.
Sreenath,
I'm puzzled by how you are asking this question.
In general the form of the user part of a sip URI should only be of
concern to the owner of the domain of that URI.
So in sip:VoiceMail;userparam=12...@wcom.com,
it is up to the owner of wcom.com to decide which user parts it is
willing
2009/6/23 Sreenath Kulkarni :
> Can u please provide me any reference for the same?
For example, when a TEL URI containing parameters is converted to SIP
URI, the parameters become part of the username:
- TEL URI:tel:+12345678;ext=200
- TEL to SIP:sip:+12345678;ext=...@somedomain.org;
Hi
I need informartion on SIP IMS behaviour in follwoing scenario:
PreCondition:
1. Mutiple public identities linked to one private identities are registered in
IMS.
2. We have implicit registration enabled meaning we do not need to send
individual registration messages for all public identity
Hi Dushyant,
It is because two participating entities in a session have their own
logical view of the session which is independent of each other's view.
Unlike a multicast session for which a SDP was primarily designed
where there is a single view of the sessions across all the
participating en
10 matches
Mail list logo
