Re: [Sip-implementors] Ringback on SIP 181 Call forward / 182 Queued

2010-03-02 Thread Vivek Batra
What I could think with respect to whether SDP is received in provisional response or not is to check in your application for RTP stream. I believe in having a check in application to check whether any RTP stream is still there or not after receiving 181 or 182 with SDP. You can't ensure that remo

Re: [Sip-implementors] Ringback on SIP 181 Call forward / 182 Queued

2010-03-02 Thread Dale Worley
On Tue, 2010-03-02 at 16:49 +0530, Sunita Bhagwat wrote: > I'd like to know if a SIP gateway receiving a 181 (Call is being > forwarded) or a 182 (call Queued) from SIP peer should play local > ringback towards the originating endpoint (say PSTN/ISDN). RFC 3960 > mentions early media and ring-back

Re: [Sip-implementors] G723.1 H and G723.1 L SDP negotiation (yet again)

2010-03-02 Thread Kevin Attard Compagno
I would imagine that you specify 5.3 only to conserve bandwidth; 6.3 only to maximize call quality with the G723 codec; annex-a to conserve bandwidth during silence periods Kevin Attard Compagno 3CX - www.3cx.com Developers of 3CX Phone System - a software based VoIP PBX On 2 March 2010 14:46,

Re: [Sip-implementors] G723.1 H and G723.1 L SDP negotiation (yet again)

2010-03-02 Thread Elison Niven
On second thoughts, what purpose does it serve to specify the bitrate for G723.1 in SDP ? Best Regards, Elison ___ Sip-implementors mailing list Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors

Re: [Sip-implementors] Announcement/Paging in SIP

2010-03-02 Thread Brett Tate
RFC 5373 can help; however because of security concerns (section 7), it likely won't allow you to override the deactivation of the feature unless the phone knows/trusts that such an override should occur. > -Original Message- > From: sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu [mail

Re: [Sip-implementors] Ringback on SIP 181 Call forward / 182 Queued

2010-03-02 Thread Sunita Bhagwat
Thanks Vivek. You are right, the choice of actual tone could be either configurable or something other than RBT. But the other aspect of the problem is to be prepared to play early media inband (if a prior 183 or current 181 contain SDP) by cutting through media or playing a specific tone - s

Re: [Sip-implementors] Ringback on SIP 181 Call forward / 182 Queued

2010-03-02 Thread Vivek Batra
Playing RBT on receipt of 181 (Call is being forwarded) or 182 (Call Queued) does not seems a good choice since 181/182 does not give any indication whether call has been placed to called party and called party is ringing. I would prefer playing Routing Tone or some sort of local announcement. RBT

[Sip-implementors] Should a PUBLISH with "Expires: 0" and no "SIP-If-Match" generate a NOTIFY?

2010-03-02 Thread IƱaki Baz Castillo
Hi, I'm thinking about a custom usage of PUBLISH method. The idea is to send a PUBLISH with body and "Expires: 0" but no "SIP-If-Match" header, so it would generate a NOTIFY for current subscribers, but since "Expires" is 0 future subscriptions would not receive such notification (this is what I

[Sip-implementors] Ringback on SIP 181 Call forward / 182 Queued

2010-03-02 Thread Sunita Bhagwat
Hi all, I'd like to know if a SIP gateway receiving a 181 (Call is being forwarded) or a 182 (call Queued) from SIP peer should play local ringback towards the originating endpoint (say PSTN/ISDN). RFC 3960 mentions early media and ring-back only when a 180 Ringing is received. However I'm seein