Re: [Sip-implementors] Processing of Standalone 200 OK response for INVITE ["200OK received by UA with different Call-id which is not in context"]

2017-07-31 Thread Prakash K
Hi Paul, Thanks a lot, You have put it in a nice way , I understood the use-case for Forking But I have the following question *This all assumes that the 2xx matches an INVITE transaction you have pending, and that the from-tag and call-id match what was in the corresponding INVITE.Otherwise

Re: [Sip-implementors] Processing of Standalone 200 OK response for INVITE ["200OK received by UA with different Call-id which is not in context"]

2017-07-31 Thread Paul Kyzivat
On 7/31/17 11:26 AM, Prakash K wrote: What would be the behavior of UA when 200 OK received which is not matching the dialog "200OK received by UA with different Call-id which is not in context" I see the following snippet in RFC 3261 which says UA should create dialog. Wont this end up in

Re: [Sip-implementors] Processing of Standalone 200 OK response for INVITE ["200OK received by UA with different Call-id which is not in context"]

2017-07-31 Thread Rohit
There is no response for a response. So no 481 will be there. Rohit Jain Sent from my iPhone > On 31-Jul-2017, at 9:31 PM, Prakash K wrote: > > How response will be sent for response ? > > UA received 200 OK for INVITE which is sent out ,* but 200 OK received is >

Re: [Sip-implementors] Processing of Standalone 200 OK response for INVITE ["200OK received by UA with different Call-id which is not in context"]

2017-07-31 Thread Prakash K
How response will be sent for response ? UA received 200 OK for INVITE which is sent out ,* but 200 OK received is with different call-id (wont match the context)* On 31 July 2017 at 21:07, Asim Sulaiman wrote: > Dear Prakash, > > I guess you will get 481 transaction

Re: [Sip-implementors] Processing of Standalone 200 OK response for INVITE ["200OK received by UA with different Call-id which is not in context"]

2017-07-31 Thread Asim Sulaiman
Dear Prakash, I guess you will get 481 transaction does not exist. Regards, Asim Sulaiman -Original Message- From: sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu [mailto:sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu] On Behalf Of Prakash K Sent: Monday, July 31, 2017 7:27 PM To:

[Sip-implementors] Processing of Standalone 200 OK response for INVITE ["200OK received by UA with different Call-id which is not in context"]

2017-07-31 Thread Prakash K
What would be the behavior of UA when 200 OK received which is not matching the dialog "200OK received by UA with different Call-id which is not in context" I see the following snippet in RFC 3261 which says UA should create dialog. Wont this end up in acknowledging the hacking? If the