Re: [Sip-implementors] Carets encasing URIs.

2009-09-04 Thread Alex Balashov
Paul Kyzivat wrote: > If you are involved in SIP, or almost any IETF protocol, then I strongly > suggest that you *learn* to read ABNF. RFC 5234 should tell you all you > need to know. No argument. It's just one of the innumerable things I haven't gotten around to. :-) -- Alex Balashov - P

Re: [Sip-implementors] Carets encasing URIs.

2009-09-04 Thread Brett Tate
tors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu] On Behalf Of Paul Kyzivat > Sent: Friday, September 04, 2009 2:05 PM > To: Alex Balashov > Cc: sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu > Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] Carets encasing URIs. > > > > Alex Balashov wrote: > > I cannot easily tell from 326

Re: [Sip-implementors] Carets encasing URIs.

2009-09-04 Thread Paul Kyzivat
Alex Balashov wrote: > I cannot easily tell from 3261 whether references to URIs other than the > Request URI must be encased in "<" and ">" or not, probably because I do > not know how to read BNF. If you are involved in SIP, or almost any IETF protocol, then I strongly suggest that you *lea

Re: [Sip-implementors] Carets encasing URIs.

2009-09-04 Thread T Satyanarayana-A12694
Of Alex Balashov Sent: Friday, September 04, 2009 11:08 PM To: sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu Subject: [Sip-implementors] Carets encasing URIs. I cannot easily tell from 3261 whether references to URIs other than the Request URI must be encased in "<" and ">" or

[Sip-implementors] Carets encasing URIs.

2009-09-04 Thread Alex Balashov
I cannot easily tell from 3261 whether references to URIs other than the Request URI must be encased in "<" and ">" or not, probably because I do not know how to read BNF. In other words, in the absence of a display name (which would be a quoted string), is this valid? Contact: sip:xx.xxx.