nks,
Neel
From: sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu
on behalf of
Ramachandran, Agalya (Contractor)
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2016 10:38:34 AM
To: sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Subject: [Sip-implementors] Query in handling 180 response by proxy
Hi All,
If
Thanks,
> Paul
>
>> Thanks,
>> Arun
>>
>>
>>>
>>>Thanks,
>>>Paul
>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> Neel
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> F
Ramachandran, Agalya (Contractor)
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2016 10:38:34 AM
To: sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Subject: [Sip-implementors] Query in handling 180 response by proxy
Hi All,
If an Invite request is received to a proxy, proxy then forks the
Invite message to two destinations.
180
,
Paul
Thanks,
Neel
From: sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu
on behalf of
Ramachandran, Agalya (Contractor)
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2016 10:38:34 AM
To: sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Subject: [Sip-implementors] Query in handling
Ramachandran, Agalya
(Contractor)
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2016 10:38:34 AM
To: sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Subject: [Sip-implementors] Query in handling 180 response by proxy
Hi All,
If an Invite request is received to a proxy, proxy then forks the Invite
message to two destinations.
180
From: sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu
on behalf of Ramachandran,
Agalya (Contractor)
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2016 10:38:34 AM
To: sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Subject: [Sip-implementors] Query in handling 180 response by proxy
Hi All,
If an
Hi Agalya,
Very specific to your scenario for 180 without SDP ,
There can be 2 scenarios based on which it depends whether to send all
forked 180 or not .
A side fork not supported :First 180 sent and next 180 with different
to-tag is consumed by proxy
A side fork supported : Both 180s relayed to
"Ramachandran, Agalya (Contractor)"
writes:
> If an Invite request is received to a proxy, proxy then forks the
> Invite message to two destinations.
> 180 Ringing Response is received from both the destinations to the proxy.
> Proxy is now forwarding both 180 Response to the request originator.
asked proxy should forward only the ringing response in
> which call leg it has been answered ?
>
>
>
> Regards,
> Agalya
>
> *From:* ankur bansal [mailto:abh.an...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Thursday, March 17, 2016 2:59 PM
> *To:* Ramachandran, Agalya (Contractor)
> *Cc:*
Hi All,
If an Invite request is received to a proxy, proxy then forks the Invite
message to two destinations.
180 Ringing Response is received from both the destinations to the proxy.
Proxy is now forwarding both 180 Response to the request originator.
Is this right behavior of proxy or it should
response in which
call leg it has been answered ?
Regards,
Agalya
From: ankur bansal [mailto:abh.an...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2016 2:59 PM
To: Ramachandran, Agalya (Contractor)
Cc: sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] Query in handling 180 response by
Behalf Of Ramachandran,
Agalya
> (Contractor)
> Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2016 11:41 AM
> To: sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
> Subject: [Sip-implementors] Query in handling 180 response by proxy
>
> Hi All,
>
> If an Invite request is received to a proxy, proxy then
Hi All,
If an Invite request is received to a proxy, proxy then forks the Invite
message to two destinations.
180 Ringing Response is received from both the destinations to the proxy.
Proxy is now forwarding both 180 Response to the request originator.
Is this right behavior of proxy or it should
13 matches
Mail list logo
