Hi there,
I have in mind , just for testing reasons, to connect my sipx installation
(3.10.2) to the internet, behind NAT using STUN services. My question is the
following:
Given that I do not have a static IP, is it possible to configure the
"listening IP" of my sipx after my first installation
I am still having issues getting 3.11 to respond to port 8443 on either
a CentOS of Fedora build. Service sipx configtest shows everything
passing. Sipx's own version of httpd is starting fine. Looking through
the configuration files it appears that sipxconfig-jetty is the service
that is suppose t
Drew-
There's a setting called "Enable100rel" on the Profile1, Profile2,
Profile2 configuration page of the GXW4104.
Mine is disabled (and always has been). Inbound calls through my 4104
do not have this "Proxy-Require" statement in the INVITE packet either.
I think you probably want to set t
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 5:45 PM, J Coatline wrote:
> Thanks everyone for your answers.
> To mranga: The fact that I can only have an ITSP registration on only one of
> the bridges is okay. I just want to have the US ITSP connected via the US
> sipXbridge, and the UK ITSP connected via the UK sipXb
Thanks everyone for your answers.
To mranga: The fact that I can only have an ITSP registration on only one of
the bridges is okay. I just want to have the US ITSP connected via the US
sipXbridge, and the UK ITSP connected via the UK sipXbridge, which will
match where most of the users using those
On Wed, 2009-02-18 at 12:39 -0500, Drew Buckman wrote:
> This is from the syslog of the 4404. Nothing jumped out to me, but I
> am new to sipx
>
>
> #Detected date/Time Detected host Original syslog message
> 2/18/2009 12:34:10 PM 192.168.1.4 <15> Feb 18 12:34:10 192.168.1.4
> S_LOG: [00
Hi Drew-
You're getting a 420 status back from sipx in response to the INVITE
resulting from the inbound PSTN call. A 420 is "bad extension". Scott
(Lawrence) or others here may be able to expand on exactly when sipx
will return a 420 but I presume it's a case of nothing registered for
that ext
Hello,
I'm looking to download SFTF. I looked into
http://www.sipfoundry.org/sftf-user-guide.html#downloading, where it says
https://scm.sipfoundry.org/rep/sftf/.
But the link fails. Any help
Thanks,
Vasanthi Ramasamy
See how Windows connects the people, information, a
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 9:56 PM, Damian Krzeminski wrote:
> J Coatline wrote:
>>
>> Am I right in thinking that a sipxecs 3.11/4.0 HA configuration can only
>> have 1 instance of sipxbridge? Trying to create the SBC role on more
>> than one server seems not to be allowed, and I have read posts tha
wouldn't that be kind of a big issue if your sites are basically on
opposite sides of the globe? are you able to keep your latency &
jitter manageable?
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 1:53 PM, Michael Picher
wrote:
> The only reason you might not would be that all voicemail and AA
> services would come
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 1:41 PM, Dale Worley wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-02-18 at 17:31 +, Gabor Paller wrote:
>
>> After this message, however, 202 Accepted does not arrive but SipX
>> immediately returns a NOTIFY.
>>
>
>> This confuses the JAIN-SIP stack, as there is no SUBSCRIBE dialog
>> establi
The only reason you might not would be that all voicemail and AA
services would come off the master PBX.
Otherwise, yes, it does make configuration easier.
Mike
On Tue, 2009-02-17 at 22:16 -0800, J Coatline wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 6:56 PM, Damian
> Krzeminski wrote:
>
>
On Wed, 2009-02-18 at 17:31 +, Gabor Paller wrote:
> After this message, however, 202 Accepted does not arrive but SipX
> immediately returns a NOTIFY.
>
> This confuses the JAIN-SIP stack, as there is no SUBSCRIBE dialog
> established, the NOTIFY goes into the void and cannot be responded t
Hi,
I am looking for some docs on sipXMediaLib. It would be great if somebody can
send me somedocs on this.
Has anybody used SipxMediaLib?
Regards,Santos
Please do not print this email unless it is absolutely necessary.
The information contained in this electronic message and any attachme
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 12:31 PM, Gabor Paller wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have the following interesting situation with SipX 3.10.2. There is a
> JAIN-SIP application subscribed to MWI notifications. Before the
> scenario presented below, there was a successful subscription and it is
> expiring, therefore
This is from the syslog of the 4404. Nothing jumped out to me, but I
am new to sipx
#Detected date/Time Detected host Original syslog message
2/18/2009 12:34:10 PM 192.168.1.4 <15> Feb 18 12:34:10 192.168.1.4
S_LOG: [00:0B:82:1A:BD:00][000][966311A][01000108] fxo_ctl.c 423
Port:0
Hi,
I have the following interesting situation with SipX 3.10.2. There is a
JAIN-SIP application subscribed to MWI notifications. Before the
scenario presented below, there was a successful subscription and it is
expiring, therefore the application sends a new subscribe. The
subscription progresse
Drew-
I have a working setup using a GXW4104 and 3.10.2 (sipx) and may be able
to help you compare your 4104 setup with that of a "working" one.
The first diagnostic step is to turn on (debug) syslog logging on the
4104 and examine that output during a test inbound call. Grandstream
isn't the b
18 matches
Mail list logo
