wouldn't that be kind of a big issue if your sites are basically on
opposite sides of the globe?  are you able to keep your latency &
jitter manageable?

On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 1:53 PM, Michael Picher
<mpic...@cmctechgroup.com> wrote:
> The only reason you might not would be that all voicemail and AA
> services would come off the master PBX.
>
> Otherwise, yes, it does make configuration easier.
>
> Mike
>
> On Tue, 2009-02-17 at 22:16 -0800, J Coatline wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 6:56 PM, Damian
>> Krzeminski <dkrze...@nortel.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>         There is a bug in sipXconfig (XCF-3296) that effectively
>>         prevent it from
>>         configuring sipXbridge on a remote server. Once it's fixed (by
>>         the end of
>>         the month) you can experiment with configuring it on a remote
>>         server.
>>         Ask again then: I'll tell you how to remove one sipXbridge per
>>         cluster
>>         limitation in sipXconfig.
>>
>>         Independent of that: are you sure you want a single HA sipXecs
>>         and not 2
>>         (or more) connected sipXecs installations. Why?
>>         D.
>>
>> Thanks, Damian, for explaining the situation.
>>
>>
>> Regarding a single HA vs 2 connected sipXecs installations, once the 1
>> sipXbridge per cluster limitation is gone, why would one _not_ do HA?
>>
>>
>>
>> I admit I haven't thought it all through and don't understand all the
>> implications, but HA seemed logical because I have one "system" which
>> I'd like to configure globally (which sounds simpler than managing
>> multiple systems, and also setting up interconnects), plus the added
>> benefit of redundancy should one of the servers go down.
>>
>>
>>
>> In short, it struck me as more elegant, but I recognize that I may
>> well be failing to understand limitations of sipXecs that might
>> actually make HA more trouble than it's worth.
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> sipx-users mailing list
>> sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
>> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users
>> Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users
> _______________________________________________
> sipx-users mailing list
> sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users
> Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users
>
_______________________________________________
sipx-users mailing list
sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users
Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users

Reply via email to