On Fri, 17 Jul 2009 10:26:00 -0400, "Scott Lawrence"
wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-07-17 at 17:14 +0300, s...@pharmacia.org.ua wrote:
>> hi,
>> is it possible that at an incoming call callback to number in CID and
>> simultaneously called to queue of ACD?
>
> Probably not, but I'm not sure that I underst
On Fri, 2009-07-17 at 14:09 -0500, voice wrote:
> i rand dig from the sipx box. I'm using sipx1.xxx.org, which is the
> domain of sipx1 but it resovles to the public sipx1.xxx.org which is
> the public ip of eth1 on the inGate which is its public ipaddr. i was
> thinking that dig from the sipx sh
I don't want to just reinstalled and side step this problem but may have too.
Primary DNS does not seem to be the problem for if it was i would not be able
to access the admin runing FQDM of sipX1 box from another networked box,
right? is it possible to reinstall bind running on the sipx1 box
Hi Kevin
I ran the DNS advisor from a MS server box and this is what was said. What is
my callserver-name? It looks like i should be running the sipx-dns on the
sipx1 box. The dns-advisor statement is under-stated. Please advise.
i guess it should look like this from the linux command line:
Hi Robert
i rand dig from the sipx box. I'm using sipx1.xxx.org, which is the domain of
sipx1 but it resovles to the public sipx1.xxx.org which is the public ip of
eth1 on the inGate which is its public ipaddr. i was thinking that dig from
the sipx should have given the priivate ipadd not the
This can happen if your SIP domain does not resolve to the IP address of
your box. Please do a DNS lookup (using 'dig' utility of instance) on
your SIP domain and make sure that the answer you get is the IP of your
box. If not then either change the DNS record or the IP of your box to
resolve the
On Fri, 17 Jul 2009 13:35:22 -0500, voice wrote:
> Thanks Scott and Dale
>
> Unless something changed on the inGate everything looks good. Primary
> public DNS is providing the right bindings.When attempting to reboot
> the sipX i now gives a list of DNS errors as if named on sipx box is
> f
Thanks Scott and Dale
Unless something changed on the inGate everything looks good. Primary public
DNS is providing the right bindings.When attempting to reboot the sipX i
now gives a list of DNS errors as if named on sipx box is failing or failed and
is looking to the primary for bindings
On Fri, 2009-07-17 at 12:28 -0500, voice wrote:
> Just got this Error after a reboot of 4.1.0 just now.
>
> SIP route to SIP_DOMAIN_NAME does not match the configured IP address
>
> Server has been working aok for weeks.
At least at the moment in question, the code couldn't get the right DNS
On Fri, 2009-07-17 at 18:40 +0100, Keith Gearty wrote:
> Dale Worley wrote:
> > On Fri, 2009-07-17 at 13:58 +0100, Keith Gearty wrote:
> >
> > > The comments at the bottom of the article (by a Microsoft guy who was
> > > working on Response Point) seem to deny the claims in the article.
> > >
On Fri, 2009-07-17 at 12:28 -0500, voice wrote:
> Hi
>
> Just got this Error after a reboot of 4.1.0 just now.
>
> SIP route to SIP_DOMAIN_NAME does not match the configured IP address
>
> Server has been working aok for weeks.
Check whether or not your DNS server is operating correctly.
Dale Worley wrote:
On Fri, 2009-07-17 at 13:58 +0100, Keith Gearty wrote:
The comments at the bottom of the article (by a Microsoft guy who was
working on Response Point) seem to deny the claims in the article.
All I see are notices that people are leaving the project and that the
cur
On Fri, 2009-07-17 at 13:58 +0100, Keith Gearty wrote:
> The comments at the bottom of the article (by a Microsoft guy who was
> working on Response Point) seem to deny the claims in the article.
All I see are notices that people are leaving the project and that the
current version will continue
Hi
Just got this Error after a reboot of 4.1.0 just now.
SIP route to SIP_DOMAIN_NAME does not match the configured IP address
Server has been working aok for weeks.___
sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List Archive: http://list.
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 12:24 PM, Tim Byng wrote:
> I have attached an ITSP template I created for voip.ms (with some help from
> Ranga). I have been using these settings for over a month and everything is
> working very well.
> There are a couple of settings I'd like to talk about:
> use-global-ad
I have attached an ITSP template I created for voip.ms (with some help from
Ranga). I have been using these settings for over a month and everything is
working very well.
There are a couple of settings I'd like to talk about:
*use-global-addressing*
voip.ms allows hosted NAT compensation to be en
I am experiencing this issue as well, sipx 4.0.1 on firmware 3.1.2 &
3.1.3 with polycom ip 550/650/670 .
On Jul 17, 2009, at 10:11 AM, Tim Byng wrote:
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 2:24 PM, Dave Deutschman > wrote:
We are using sip.ld v3.1.3B with our 4.0.1 system and speed dial /
BLF is working f
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 2:24 PM, Dave Deutschman <
ddeutsch...@isdomaininc.com> wrote:
> We are using sip.ld v3.1.3B with our 4.0.1 system and speed dial / BLF is
> working fine.
>
> I would upgrade your phones to 3.1.3B or 3.1.3C.
>
Thanks for the suggestion. I updated to 3.1.3C, but unfortunate
On Fri, 2009-07-17 at 17:14 +0300, s...@pharmacia.org.ua wrote:
> hi,
> is it possible that at an incoming call callback to number in CID and
> simultaneously called to queue of ACD?
Probably not, but I'm not sure that I understand the question. Can you
please lay out in more detail what you want
hi,
is it possible that at an incoming call callback to number in CID and
simultaneously called to queue of ACD?
___
sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users
Unsubscribe: http://lis
Looks pretty dead to me...
They might push people into OCS and add some more functionality there
(in the long term) but they haven't been very successful with OCS
either.
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Keith Gearty [mailto:ke...@glensound.co.uk]
Sent: Friday, July 17, 2009 8:58 AM
To: Pi
The comments at the bottom of the article (by a Microsoft guy who was
working on Response Point) seem to deny the claims in the article.
___
sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-use
Microsoft kills Response Point...
http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/microsoft/microsoft-kills-respon
se-point-ip-pbx.asp
___
sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-user
Hi,
I used for a long time a Siemens C470 ip. It is definitely targeted to
the home market, but very nice in phone usability and battery life. Is
not meant to be connected to a pbx. Moh with sipx does not work and I
had issues with blind transfers. It does not support BLF. Other phones
cannot c
Hello Rene
Please see here:
http://sipx-wiki.calivia.com/index.php/Create_a_wiki_account
Keith.
Rene Pankratz wrote:
I would like to do that but I cannot create an account for the wiki.
It seemsthe links are broken there...
http://sipx-wiki.calivia.com/index.php/Help:Contents
When I cli
I would like to do that but I cannot create an account for the wiki. It
seemsthe links are broken there...
http://sipx-wiki.calivia.com/index.php/Help:Contents
When I click on "create an account" i get back to login screen...
René
2009/7/9 M. Ranganathan
> On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 5:25 AM, Rene
26 matches
Mail list logo
