Re: [sipx-users] BLF on Soundpoint

2009-07-21 Thread Dale Worley
On Tue, 2009-07-21 at 17:12 -0400, ingo...@netvision.an wrote: > What steps should one take to have BLF on Soundpoint phones? Preferred > result is that a user can see his/her contact status at all times without > even attempting to call him/her. This Wiki page describes how to set up the BLF list

Re: [sipx-users] SIP trunking between two IPPBX's

2009-07-21 Thread naga raju
is there any need of sip trunking service providers leased line to test sip trunking between two local IPPBX's? if yes should i get any test acount with any service provider? On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 7:28 AM, Tony Graziano wrote: > Yes. If the two LAN are interconnected without a firewall or vi

[sipx-users] FW: Small Business configuration suggestions

2009-07-21 Thread Jonathan Petersen
Tony, Thanks for the quick reply! The 5800 port was a typo (sorry) it is indeed 5080 (checked and double checked firewall and sipx config). The ITSP is a company called Binary Telecom (www.binarytelecom.com). They are a local company and I have direct contact with the owner (thought that might b

Re: [sipx-users] Small Business configuration suggestions

2009-07-21 Thread Tony Graziano
A little more information would be helpful. What carrier are you using for siptrunking? The issues you are mentioning suggest a trunking issue rather than firewall. A lot of ITSP's do not support every feature. You mentioned port 5800, normally that would be 5080. Is 5800 the signalling port you

[sipx-users] Small Business configuration suggestions

2009-07-21 Thread Jonathan Petersen
Hello, I am attempting to use sipx as a solution for a small business telephone system. I have 10 Polycom IP330's and one Polycom IP650. I would like to have the following configuration: - Firewall (either m0n0wall or PFSense) on a DSL circuit - SIP Trunk using sipxbridge - Support t

[sipx-users] BLF on Soundpoint

2009-07-21 Thread ingomar
What steps should one take to have BLF on Soundpoint phones? Preferred result is that a user can see his/her contact status at all times without even attempting to call him/her. ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive:

Re: [sipx-users] IS SIPX going to Avaya

2009-07-21 Thread Scott Lawrence
On Tue, 2009-07-21 at 12:44 -0500, Goran Donev wrote: > As we all have probably heard that Avaya is buying Nortel’s Enterprise > division. > > Does that mean Avaya developers will be joining the foray of SIPX > development? http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/msg15960.html __

[sipx-users] IS SIPX going to Avaya

2009-07-21 Thread Goran Donev
As we all have probably heard that Avaya is buying Nortel's Enterprise division. Does that mean Avaya developers will be joining the foray of SIPX development? Thanks. ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://

[sipx-users] Nortel Enterprise Sale announcement

2009-07-21 Thread Scott Lawrence
I've gotten a few off-list requests for information about yesterdays announcements regarding the sale of the Nortel Enterprise business. For anyone not following them - Nortel[1] and Avaya[2] announced yesterday that a bid from Avaya has been accepted as the so-called 'stalking horse' offer to pur

[sipx-users] Sipxecs 4.0 and 4.01 Few Questions

2009-07-21 Thread Jason Jason
Hello All,   We currently have a environment with 3 x Sipxecs 4.0, 1 server being main server holding  AA, dial plans, and hold 1 departmental queues. The other two are holding 3 departmental queues each.   We were having issues upgrading to Sipxecs 4.01 via yum process, so we made a plan to upg

Re: [sipx-users] Remote worker cannot call to second intranet subnets

2009-07-21 Thread jun,wen
OK, no problem, will sent to you soon. Thanks in advance. -Original Message- From: Robert Joly [mailto:rj...@nortel.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2009 10:44 PM To: jun,wen; sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org Subject: RE: [sipx-users] Remote worker cannot call to second intranet subnets Ok, I

Re: [sipx-users] Remote worker cannot call to second intranet subnets

2009-07-21 Thread Robert Joly
Ok, I took that as far as I could without a snapshot. Could you turn the logging level to DEBUG for sipXproxy, reproduce the call and send me your system snapshot? > -Original Message- > From: jun,wen [mailto:jun@msn.com] > Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2009 10:41 AM > To: Joly, Robert (

Re: [sipx-users] Remote worker cannot call to second intranet subnets

2009-07-21 Thread jun,wen
Yes, it is still one-way speech path, from remote worker to sip client inside intranet. The router well terminates VPN tunnel for these two subnets since sip phone inside them can make call to each other. Both of them are disabled SIP ALG. -Original Message- From: Robert Joly [mailto:rj...

Re: [sipx-users] Remote worker cannot call to second intranet subnets

2009-07-21 Thread Robert Joly
Ok, we are making progress. Still you get one-way speech path? What about the routers terminating the VPN tunnels for 192.168.8.0/24 and 192.168.10.0/24? Would they also have a SIP ALG enabled? > -Original Message- > From: jun,wen [mailto:jun@msn.com] > Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 20

Re: [sipx-users] Remote worker cannot call to second intranet subnets

2009-07-21 Thread jun,wen
I made my eyebeam as you pointed. Now it gives me "x-sipX-privcontact" in the Registration. -Original Message- From: Robert Joly [mailto:rj...@nortel.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2009 9:16 PM To: jun,wen; sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org Subject: RE: [sipx-users] Remote worker cannot call t

[sipx-users] Dial out

2009-07-21 Thread Derek Bartolo
We got an SCS500 to finally dial out using an MP-114 FXO but it 8-10 seconds after you dial a number before you hear the ringing. The phone being used is a Polycom IP550.Does anyone know why or what could be causing this delay? Any ideas or suggestions will be greatly appreciated J Thanks

Re: [sipx-users] Remote worker cannot call to second intranet subnets

2009-07-21 Thread Robert Joly
After making your changes make sure that you restart eyebeam to force a re-registration. If your eyebeam still shows up with a x-sipX-nonat in the registration page of sipXconfig then something is still trying to do NAT compensation (and doing a poor job at it). For eyebeam, please make sure that

Re: [sipx-users] Can't Enable Exchange AutoAttendand and Voicemail

2009-07-21 Thread Matt White
Just add a secondary ip address to the current ip address on the Exchange server.   Go to edit the ip address and then click advanced.  There is a box to add a secondary ip address.  Exchange 2007 will immediately start listening on all available ip's (unless you specifically