> And if it was a remote user, it's entirely possible the firewall in front of
> your system might block icmp, which would not be "undesirable".
Right, and I'm pretty sure I've told him not to expect ping replies.
I was wondering if remote users might experience problems depending on which
SIP c
And if it was a remote user, it's entirely possible the firewall in front of
your system might block icmp, which would not be "undesirable".
Tony Graziano, Manager
Telephone: 434.984.8430
Fax: 434.984.8431
Email: tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net
LAN/Telephony/Security and
Hello,
Does anybody has any experience with THOMSON SpeedTouch IP phones and sipx?
Best Regards,
Krzysztof Ślazyk
___
sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users
Unsubscribe: http://
> When you say "it would try to ping logicoreucs.net", do you mean that it
> actually did a ping (ICMP ECHO_REQUEST)? There is no reason to do that,
> and no reason to expect it to succeed.
Actually, I should have edited that out, it's not the relevant part, sorry.
The question was really asking
On Wed, 2009-12-23 at 14:49 -0600, m...@grounded.net wrote:
> > That made me curious, so I cranked up Wireshark and watched what Ekiga
> > was doing when it tried to register. I was getting pretty sleepy by
> > that point, so I didn't do anything in-depth and I'm not 100% positive
> > about this.
If you're using the TA 900 for PRI trunking then you have to use
sipXbridge, even with 2.0.5 firmware. Without it, directed call pickup
and attended transfers won't work.
I've been dealing with that since I first implemented sipX.
Ken Fulmer wrote:
Good
info. We’ve had issues
I was hoping that this might be of some interest to developers. I don't know if
this is specific to sipx or something else which is why I wanted to pass the
information on.
On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 14:29:15 -0600, m...@grounded.net wrote:
> This is some input I just received from a remote tester.
On Wed, 2009-12-23 at 11:37 -0800, arda savran wrote:
> Just tried to duplicate a working AA in the system. Still the same
> error.
> The system cannot replicate the autoattendants.xml file...
>
> Cant see any reported issue for the same reason; thinking about
> opening a bug report..
>
>
Ther
On Wed, 2009-12-23 at 13:51 -0500, Picher, Michael wrote:
> Yes, but a lot of that history is good... I know that I still have a
> few 3.10.x machines out there and need to fine info once in a while.
Well, you really should schedule upgrades for them, if only because
updates after 4.0 will be muc
Just tried to duplicate a working AA in the system. Still the same error.
The system cannot replicate the autoattendants.xml file...
Cant see any reported issue for the same reason; thinking about opening a bug
report..
--- On Tue, 12/22/09, Picher, Michael wrote:
From: Picher, Michael
Su
Good info. We've had issues with Polycom phones and REFER for call
transfers. So, we've been sending calls through the sipXbridge.
Ken
From: Josh Patten [mailto:jpat...@co.brazos.tx.us]
Sent: Wednesday, December 23, 2009 1:00 PM
To: Ken Fulmer
Cc: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
Subject: R
I'm assuming it's a Total Access 900 series? If so, you HAVE to run at
least firmware 2.0.5 (the latest). That is the first firmware version
that (somewhat) supports REFER.
Ken Fulmer wrote:
We have users with iphones that register to the
sipX server
with only the user being cr
Yes, but a lot of that history is good... I know that I still have a few
3.10.x machines out there and need to fine info once in a while.
I just don't see (after looking at the wiki program a bit) how we will handle
full documentation. It really looks like we'll need to copy everything from
4
It is a very good new years resolution i think.
Personally, just removing dated docs would be a vast improvment
as i (initially) get confused reading about stuff that has already been
fixed.
Vänliga hälsningar/Kind Regards
Ola Samuelson
Från: sipx-users-b
Yes, assuming the Adtran plays nicely with SIP. The only time you need
to add a phone is if it is a managed device.
Mike
From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
[mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Ken Fulmer
Sent: Wednesday, December 23, 2009 12:14 PM
To: sipx
We have users with iphones that register to the sipX server with only the
user being created (no phone). The application on the iphone registers and
works well.
Can an Adtran router with analog ports register to the sipX server in the
same manner?
Thanks,
Ken
I have found that it doesn't matter what signaling I use. I've tried
NI2, DMS-100, and ESS5 and all of them have the same problem on the
Audiocodes.
Picher, Michael wrote:
I've had trouble with integration before with Patton and other PBX's.
One thing I did to get around things was to try
On Mon, 2009-12-21 at 15:09 -0500, Scott Lawrence wrote:
> I propose that as one of our New Years Resolutions for 2010 we resolve
> to improve our project documentation dramatically. I think that using
> Confluence offers us some real advantages toward that goal:
That's all very good, and much be
Scott wrote:
...
> I propose that as one of our New Years Resolutions for 2010
> we resolve to improve our project documentation dramatically.
+1
> I think that using Confluence offers us some real advantages
> toward that goal:
>
> * Generally I think Confluence is a nicer wiki tool than
http://sipx-wiki.calivia.com/index.php/Adding_support_for_managed_phones
>>> "Winson (Elabram)" 12/23/09 2:29 AM >>>
I have a new model Audiocodes 310HD IP-Phone / G-Tek AQ102 but i cant
add any new model phone in the web base.
Thank you
___
sipx-user
Ok, I can see that now.
I love DNS.
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Scott Lawrence [mailto:scottlawr...@avaya.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2009 7:46 AM
To: Picher, Michael
Cc: Josh Patten; sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Location based DNS SRV records
On Tue,
I've had trouble with integration before with Patton and other PBX's.
One thing I did to get around things was to try different integrations /
signaling on one end or both (dms100 / etc...).
Mike
-Original Message-
From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
[mailto:sipx-users-boun...@li
You might want the 'use provision' on...
Mike
From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
[mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Romano
Ramdas
Sent: Wednesday, December 23, 2009 4:42 AM
To: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
Subject: [sipx-users] problem to manage Hitachi
Hello,
I want to use 2 Hitachi Wireless IP3000 with SipXecs. The system is
currently running sipxcommons 4.0.4-017289.
Both phones are getting a valid IP from the DCHP and after setting the
phones up in sipXconfig, profiles are sent.
DCHP and DNS are running on the SipXecs machine, and are th
24 matches
Mail list logo
