Hello,
We are trying to integrate the Polycom IP 650 attendant console to a
directory of any type without having to manually import a file to the
phone via sipXecs.
I would like to do the following:
1. Configure the system so that the phone can access specific user
group phone boo
I've been using the current (pre release) code, the Polycom plugin changed to
using 127 as part of the 3.2.2 firmware transition. My 550's and 335's all had
to be set back to 101 for it to work right with voip.ms (and my SPA3102's).
At least that's not your problem them :)
-Eric
On Mar 8, 2010
Sorry, I misled you by saying "phone". It is actually a single-port FXS device
made by Grandstream.
http://sipx-wiki.calivia.com/index.php/HowTo_configure_Grandstream_HandyTone_with_sipX
I have used it for a grand total of one day. But it seems to work OK so far.
On Mar 8, 2010, at 5:03 PM, Jos
From my understanding Grandstream support is a "best effort" scenario
and in my opinion should be avoided. I fought for over a year with
Grandstream about presence issues that were causing the phones to lock
up and finally gave up and bought polycom 550's. They're double the
price but so much
Using 4.1.6-018058 2010-02-20T17:33:02 ecs-centos5 ...
I set syslog server and NTP server parameters in Devices->Network Parameters.
Then I added a Grandstream HandyTone 286 phone.
The NTP server value shows up as the default. But the syslog server is blank.
If someone else also feels this is a b
shouldn't it be easier to deploy since there is not dual NAT (nat on server
end, and nat on client end) to worry about? the server has a public IP
accessible and I just blocked all unnecessary ports. I believe the no audio or
one way issue is attributed to the server being behind NAT and the p
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 4:46 PM, Francis Tinio wrote:
> Hi
>
> I deployed another sipx server (server is remote located with public IP
> (firewall is within server, no NAT). I provisioned 3 polycom phones. All 3
> phones are created via phone group, so all have the same settings. All 3
> phone
Hi
I deployed another sipx server (server is remote located with public IP
(firewall is within server, no NAT). I provisioned 3 polycom phones. All 3
phones are created via phone group, so all have the same settings. All 3
phones have successfully registered with the server as well and all
These features would be convenient as some our deployments are on closed
and sometimes completely separate networks than the other core servers.
We would not necessarily want some personnel to have access to the OS
level of the SipxECS server, but be able to administer via the gui.
Webmin and SSH
On Mon, 2010-03-08 at 11:04 -0500, Tony Graziano wrote:
> I for one don't mind managing is independently, I just find the
> assumption that using the whole subnet and not giving the admin the
> choice to set the range during instal can lead to problems down the
> road.
I _think_ that the problem
NTP is already in sipx.
I for one don't mind managing is independently, I just find the assumption
that using the whole subnet and not giving the admin the choice to set the
range during instal can lead to problems down the road.
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 10:40 AM, Austin Curry wrote:
> I would
On Mon, 2010-03-08 at 09:40 -0600, Austin Curry wrote:
> I would love to see a “system management” component under for servers
> that would allow you to configure and control
> DHCP, DNS, NTP and other Linux services directly from Sipxecs gui..
on the road map for the release after 4.2 (whatever
I would love to see a "system management" component under for servers
that would allow you to configure and control
DHCP, DNS, NTP and other Linux services directly from Sipxecs gui..
Austin
From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
[mailto:sipx-users-boun
13 matches
Mail list logo
