Is there any way to configure an IMAP prefix to use with voicemail
synchronization? Perhaps a configuration file somewhere?
--
Christopher
___
sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List Archive:
Use this, but be sure to do a yum clean all first.
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 12:00 AM, Rhon c4rdi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to install ntp on my sipxecs 4.0.4 installation but are getting
some error as shown below:
[r...@sipxecs ~]# yum install ntp
Loading downloadonly plugin
Right now sipx sychronizes with the user's email inbox folder and that is
hardcoded. You could enter an
improvement jira and we could consider for a future release.
Peter
From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
I had a working server on CentOS 5.4. After being disconnected from
the network for a day, the whole network configuration got screwed up.
So, I ran sipxecs-setup-system and configured, what turned out to be
eth0 interface. That didn't resolve the problem. The hardware is
fine.. FYI... there
Wow that sucks. Do yourself a favor and disable all but one eth interface on
the mb. Start the system and do an ifconfig and ensure the os knows you have
one active ethernet.
Tony Graziano, Manager
Telephone: 434.984.8430
Fax: 434.984.8431
Email:
I thought I did disable the other nic.
I am not sure, do you mean run just plain ifconfig or are there
special parameters I should use to verify the other nic is disabled?
Thanks again for your help
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 12:02 PM, Tony Graziano
tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net wrote:
Wow that
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 12:16 PM, Roman Gelfand rgelfa...@gmail.com wrote:
I thought I did disable the other nic.
I am not sure, do you mean run just plain ifconfig or are there
special parameters I should use to verify the other nic is disabled?
Thanks again for your help
On Wed, Mar 24,
Did you reboot after you did that?
-Original Message-
From: Roman Gelfand [mailto:rgelfa...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2010 11:50 AM
To: Picher, Michael
Cc: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] sipxecs-setup-system
When you say keep the one you want,
This may be a crazy question, but is anyone running the 4.1.7 beat in
production?
Thanks,
Ken Fulmer
___
sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users
Unsubscribe:
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 4:17 PM, Ken Fulmer
kenful...@icstechnologysolutions.com wrote:
This may be a crazy question, but is anyone running the 4.1.7 beat in
production?
Thanks,
Ken Fulmer
___
sipx-users mailing list
Hmm.I'm wondering about a new install instead of an upgrade. Is anyone doing
that yet?
Ken
From: Tony Graziano [mailto:tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net]
Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2010 3:37 PM
To: Ken Fulmer
Cc: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] 4.1.7
On Wed,
It only matters how you get there.
The code is the same either way.
Tony Graziano, Manager
Telephone: 434.984.8430
Fax: 434.984.8431
Email: tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net
LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk:
Telephone: 434.984.8426
Fax: 434.984.8427
yes.
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 3:59 PM, Picher, Michael
mpic...@cmctechgroup.com wrote:
Did you reboot after you did that?
-Original Message-
From: Roman Gelfand [mailto:rgelfa...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2010 11:50 AM
To: Picher, Michael
Cc: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
You really ought to indicate what you discovered when you ran ifconfig. Do
you have an eth interface, does it have an ip address? Is your network
running at the OS level?
Tony Graziano, Manager
Telephone: 434.984.8430
Fax: 434.984.8431
Email:
Ok, thanks. I didn't know if there were fewer issues with a clean install
than an upgrade.
Ken
-Original Message-
From: Tony Graziano [mailto:tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net]
Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2010 4:01 PM
To: kenful...@icstechnologysolutions.com
Cc: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
On Wed, 2010-03-24 at 17:06 -0400, Tony Graziano wrote:
You really ought to indicate what you discovered when you ran ifconfig. Do
you have an eth interface, does it have an ip address? Is your network
running at the OS level
Check the ifcfg-eth0 script to make sure that the MAC address
Probably fewer. If you have a single piece of hardware do a backup in sipx
(I always grab the dhcpleases file to) and export phones and users. Use a
new drive and install 4.1.7 and then:
Install, import phones and users from export files. Restore voicemail.
Rebuild all dial plans, hunt groups,
On 3/24/2010 3:37 PM, Tony Graziano wrote:
Only been up for a couple of days but definitely quashed my zombie (FS
CPU) with it.
This issue is definitely fixed in the latest version? I haven't seen any
updates on the open ticket. that will be a blessing for me when I am
able to upgrade to a
On Wed, 2010-03-24 at 17:02 -0500, Matthew Kitchin (public/usenet)
wrote:
On 3/24/2010 3:37 PM, Tony Graziano wrote:
Only been up for a couple of days but definitely quashed my zombie (FS
CPU) with it.
This issue is definitely fixed in the latest version? I haven't seen any
updates on
On 3/24/2010 5:18 PM, Scott Lawrence wrote:
On Wed, 2010-03-24 at 17:02 -0500, Matthew Kitchin (public/usenet)
wrote:
On 3/24/2010 3:37 PM, Tony Graziano wrote:
Only been up for a couple of days but definitely quashed my zombie (FS
CPU) with it.
This issue is definitely
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 6:24 PM, Matthew Kitchin (public/usenet)
mkitchin.pub...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3/24/2010 5:18 PM, Scott Lawrence wrote:
On Wed, 2010-03-24 at 17:02 -0500, Matthew Kitchin (public/usenet)
wrote:
On 3/24/2010 3:37 PM, Tony Graziano wrote:
Only been up for a
That is why I was a little surprised to see that it was fixed. I didn't think
any progress had been made. (Sorry for top posting - bberry doesn't format well)
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
-Original Message-
From: Tony Graziano tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010
Are you talking about the reply text being at the top of the email
rather than the bottom? I think it makes it more readable with the reply
at the top. In fact, I sometimes don't read the mailing list posts that
have the reply at the bottom because then I have to scroll all the way
down,
Yes. Some people can't stand it (top posting). Different lists seem to have
different 'opinions'. I'm officially putting the lid on the can of worms here.
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
-Original Message-
From: Josh Patten jpat...@co.brazos.tx.us
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 18:09:22
To:
Cut it out. Scott HATES top posters! Its a rude list behavior. I'm a top
rude boy myself.
Tony Graziano, Manager
Telephone: 434.984.8430
Fax: 434.984.8431
Email: tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net
LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk:
Telephone:
I'm laughing so hard I had to get another drink. We'll all find ourselves on
someone's list if it keeps up.
Tony Graziano, Manager
Telephone: 434.984.8430
Fax: 434.984.8431
Email: tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net
LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk:
On Wed, 2010-03-24 at 17:24 -0500, Matthew Kitchin (public/usenet)
wrote:
On 3/24/2010 3:37 PM, Tony Graziano wrote:
Only been up for a couple of days but definitely quashed my zombie (FS
CPU) with it.
This issue is definitely fixed in the latest version? I haven't seen
I actually researched that issue at FS (bad ton top posting again) nd saw
that the comments were to go to 1.0.5. Makes me want to suggest a patch for
4.0 to use FS 1.05 though...
Tony Graziano, Manager
Telephone: 434.984.8430
Fax: 434.984.8431
Email:
Dittos... the devs are funny about bottom posts though.
From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
[mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Josh Patten
Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2010 7:09 PM
To: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] 4.1.7
Are you
Aw. I'm gonna tell. You did a bad top-post tjhing.
Tony Graziano, Manager
Telephone: 434.984.8430
Fax: 434.984.8431
Email: tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net
LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk:
Telephone: 434.984.8426
Fax: 434.984.8427
Helpdesk Contract
Well, I almost didn't read Scott's reply because he bottom posted and
I'm lazy... but I needed the exercise so I arrowed all the way to the
bottom... whew!
-Original Message-
From: Tony Graziano [mailto:tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net]
Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2010 7:58 PM
To: Picher,
The lid must have slipped off the can... Worms everywhere.
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
-Original Message-
From: Picher, Michael mpic...@cmctechgroup.com
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 20:05:34
To: Tony Grazianotgrazi...@myitdepartment.net; jpat...@co.brazos.tx.us;
Worm wranglers thump the ground to vibrate the sod and make the worms crawl
out of their holes (no kidding). Time to go fishing!
Tony Graziano, Manager
Telephone: 434.984.8430
Fax: 434.984.8431
Email: tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net
LAN/Telephony/Security and Control
So is the answer ultimately that it cannot handle any packet loss or a tiny bit
in order to not affect user to user calls over the Internet?
On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 20:24:12 -0400, Tony Graziano wrote:
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 8:16 PM, Josh Patten jpat...@co.brazos.tx.us
wrote:
Media relay is
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 8:28 PM, m...@grounded.net m...@grounded.netwrote:
So is the answer ultimately that it cannot handle any packet loss or a tiny
bit in order to not affect user to user calls over the Internet?
On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 20:24:12 -0400, Tony Graziano wrote:
On Mon, Mar 22,
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Organization: SipXecs Forum
X-FUDforum: 08063afcdd00a6e76393c5b9527381e8 43811
Message-ID: ab23.4baab...@forum.sipfoundry.org
I'm evaluating 4.0.4 and am trying paging and intercom with
Aastra and Grandstream phones. I
On Wed, 2010-03-24 at 19:28 -0500, m...@grounded.net wrote:
So is the answer ultimately that it cannot handle any packet loss or a
tiny bit in order to not affect user to user calls over the Internet?
Not at all. A typical media packet has only 10-40 milliseconds of media
(depending on codec
Any packet loss will result in a garble. A little bit more makes someone
into darth vader. A little bit more means your call just got blasted into
smithereens by the death star.
Hehe, Darth Vader! ROFL.
Thanks.
___
sipx-users mailing list
K. Just got it working.
I couldn''t shutdown one of the interfaces through bios.
Then I created ifcfg-eth0 file which contained configuration for eth1
device id as it has been said that sipxecs looks for eth0. That
worked.
Thanks
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 5:59 PM, Roman Gelfand
Hi,
I'm planning to install SipXecs-4.0.4 into a new server. Does anyone here
were able to successfully install SipXecs-4.0.4 on Fedora 11 64bit machine?
Thanks
___
sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List Archive:
It is usually recommended to use CentOS 5.x for production installs.
I use CentOS 5.4 64 bit for my production systems.
Rhon wrote:
Hi,
I'm planning to install SipXecs-4.0.4 into a new server. Does anyone
here were able to successfully install SipXecs-4.0.4 on Fedora 11 64bit
machine?
Hello all;
I am playing around with setting up my test phones (Polycom 650 and
Polycom 321) to connect to a SIPx server with a public IP, and the
phones are behind NAT.
I have enabled NAT Traversal under Internet Calling, and I have
removed all subnets from Intranet subnets.
IP of Server :
To me that looks like whatever router you are using in front of the
phones is doing NAT compensation via a SIP ALG. Sometimes it's difficult
to disable the ALG, depending on the router.
Could you post some information about what networking equipment you are
using, particularly what firewall
The NAT device for the phones is a Cisco 2811. Just a standard NAT config.
ip nat inside source route-map WAN1 interface FastEthernet0/0 overload
route-map WAN1 permit 10
match ip address internal-nat-range
match interface FastEthernet0/0
ip access-list extended internal-nat-range
deny ip
Hi Everyone,
We've been having a hard time making our Cisco 7970G work with SipXecs-4.0.4
and we are already running out of time for the deployment of our project.
I wonder if someone can share with us a working SEP file to start with so we
can isolate and minimize problem trace.
Also, how can
We currently have multiple ITSPs coming into SIPXBridge and we are using
internal sipXBridge to handle them. We can direct all inbound requests to
auto-attendant but what if we want to go a little bit more advanced than that.
Lets say we purchase 5 numbers from an ITSP and we would like 3 of
-Original Message-
From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
[mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Scott Lawrence
Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2010 5:55 PM
To: m...@grounded.net
Cc: sipx-users
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Packet loss Question
On Wed, 2010-03-24 at
47 matches
Mail list logo
