4.4.0 trace only shows a registration, not an INVITE attempt thru the trunk
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 5:46 AM, Irena Dolovčak wrote:
> here are the logs from both servers.
> By crash i mean that the configuration test fails. (system -> services ->
> SIP trunking)
ok, this is a different story, you
I see some strange things on my sipXecs installation.
1. The value of "Internal SBC Statistics - Active Calls" is growing week by
week. For the example it was 12 last midnight.
2. Firewall (kerio winroute) shows more RTP connections than calls.
3. "CDR - Active" page rarely shows hung call with u
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Organization: SipXecs Forum
In-Reply-To:
X-FUDforum: 08063afcdd00a6e76393c5b9527381e8 <57553>
Message-ID:
The mailto: is not in the log text, this is something
inserted as a consequence of the copy-paste route to the
Am 04.03.2011 um 22:09 schrieb Martin Steinmann:
> LGPL, GPL and AGPL are explicitly compatible, and they all are technically
> incompatible with MPL, at least in the view of the FSF. The change to AGPL
> is necessary to make sure the sipXecs project can continue in a world of
> cloud hosting
LGPL, GPL and AGPL are explicitly compatible, and they all are technically
incompatible with MPL, at least in the view of the FSF. The change to AGPL
is necessary to make sure the sipXecs project can continue in a world of
cloud hosting. As we close a loophole we knew we could not make it perfect
That only is related to the relicensing of Mozilla itself. We have no intend to
relicense FreeSWITCH. We choose the MPL on purpose and we have no intend
whatsoever to change it.
Nothing in this FAQ states that the AGPL is compatible with the L-GPL or the MPL
Mozilla multi licenses all of its code
Some good reading links for people interested in the whole License stuff
http://webmink.com/essays/open-by-rule/
http://webmink.com/2011/03/02/is-mozilla-open-by-rule
http://www.tomhull.com/ocston/docs/mozgpl.html
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html
Am 04.03.2011 um 15:26 schrieb Michal
This might help you:
http://www-archive.mozilla.org/MPL/relicensing-faq.html
--martin
From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
[mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Michal Bielicki
Sent: Friday, March 04, 2011 8:50 AM
To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs s
http://wiki.sipfoundry.org/display/sipXecs/Cisco+Gateways
I just added a sample config for you...
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 1:35 PM, Michael Picher wrote:
> I believe there are some users out there who are running with Cisco routers
> as their gateways...
>
> If you are familliar with the Cisco's
I believe there are some users out there who are running with Cisco routers
as their gateways...
If you are familliar with the Cisco's that would be a huge cost savings to
you.
Thanks,
Mike
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 12:55 PM, Becker, Jesse wrote:
> Thanks, Mike, for you reply.
>
> Has anyone use
Thanks, Mike, for you reply.
Has anyone used a Cisco router (2811) with PRIs with sipXecs or would you
recommend that we move our PRIs to Audio Codes should the college make the
decision to move from Cisco Call Manager to sipXecs?
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 5:12 PM, Michael Picher wrote:
> If your
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 11:10 AM, Michael Picher wrote:
> Kumaran,
>
> File a feature request... http://track.sipfoundry.org
>
> Mike
(It might also make sense to have an option to create a new group with
simply the same members)
>
> On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 4:38 AM, Kumaran
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi All,
I don't think that will be addressed in 4.4...
You could of course do this with SBC's or a gateway at each location that
can register out to a SIP trunk (Patton SmartNode).
Mike
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 5:59 AM, Gerald Drouillard
wrote:
> On 3/4/2011 4:51 AM, Todd Hodgen wrote:
>
> Some carrier
Kumaran,
File a feature request... http://track.sipfoundry.org
Mike
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 4:38 AM, Kumaran <
thiru.venkateshwa...@ttplservices.com> wrote:
> Hi All,
>Could we have reset button for User group and phone group.It
> would reset user and phone to default setting,instead of
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 11:05 AM, Michael Picher wrote:
> backup does not backup dhcpd.conf or named.conf or ntp.conf or any zone
> files...
>
> they may not be there if they weren't enabled in the setup...
>
(nor does it backup the dhcptab/leases file or cdr database)
> On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 12:5
backup does not backup dhcpd.conf or named.conf or ntp.conf or any zone
files...
they may not be there if they weren't enabled in the setup...
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 12:58 PM, Michael Scheidell <
michael.scheid...@secnap.com> wrote:
> On 3/2/11 8:59 PM, Michael Scheidell wrote:
>
> i seem to re
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 10:47 AM, Michael Picher wrote:
> Jeff,
>
> When we find bugs or would like a feature enhancement the best place to file
> something is in the Jira (http://track.sipfoundry.org).
>
> This sounds like a logical enhancement / change.
Also, I'm not aware of any thing implement
Try re-sending the server profile to see if that helps...
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 9:33 AM, Staffan Kerker wrote:
>
> On 3 mar 2011, at 15.22, Tony Graziano wrote:
>
> > The build might be important. The one dated Feb 19 had an issue where the
> call would be connected but there were several secon
Jeff,
When we find bugs or would like a feature enhancement the best place to file
something is in the Jira (http://track.sipfoundry.org).
This sounds like a logical enhancement / change.
Thanks,
Mike
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 6:26 PM, Jeff Ferrara wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We are using the Openfir
INVITE sip:mailto:18005551...@losangeles.voip.ms;sipxecs-lineid=2 SIP/2.0\r
___
I don't know where that "mailto" URI came from, but it is deeply wrong.
I don't know of any way that could be introduced through nor
One more time in a more argumentative way.
Am 03.03.2011 um 20:06 schrieb Martin Steinmann:
> In early 2004 when we first created SIPfoundry cloud computing and Software
> as a Service (SaaS) were not yet ubiquitous trends. Software was sold and
> distributed and then run by the enterprise in
Being one of these strange freeswitch founding members I have to disagree. The
L-GPL allows me to link to a L-GPL licensed library if my software is MPL. One
of the reasons why some of the libs we use in freeswitch are LGPL ones.
Am 04.03.2011 um 14:39 schrieb Matt White:
On 3/4/2011 at 0
>>> On 3/4/2011 at 08:04 AM, in message
<69c6757b-7d44-4a38-aa7c-398d7b076...@seventhsignal.de>, Michal Bielicki
wrote:
> Oh so you are going to resign of using any direct freeswitch interaction ?
> FreeSWITCH is MPL and 100% incompatible with AGPL.
>
The MPL is no more incompatible with the A
Oh so you are going to resign of using any direct freeswitch interaction ?
FreeSWITCH is MPL and 100% incompatible with AGPL.
Am 03.03.2011 um 20:06 schrieb Martin Steinmann:
> In early 2004 when we first created SIPfoundry cloud computing and Software
> as a Service (SaaS) were not yet ubiquit
On 3/4/2011 4:51 AM, Todd Hodgen wrote:
Some carriers have multiple IP addresses that you can use for their
gateway. I have successfully configured three companies on the same
sipXecs system to three different IP addresses at the same ITSP. You
then can assign a group of lines to a particul
Some carriers have multiple IP addresses that you can use for their gateway.
I have successfully configured three companies on the same sipXecs system to
three different IP addresses at the same ITSP. You then can assign a group
of lines to a particular trunk group successfully. That group only a
Hi All,
Could we have reset button for User group and phone group.It
would reset user and phone to default setting,instead of doing manually
in each option or without deleting a User or Phone group and doing from
scratch
Thanks & Regards
Kumaran T
___
Wishful thinking, at least right now. Until branch locations can be
assigned and gateways (subaccounts) can be assigned to branches it is
unusable.
When that happens it will be possible to have trunks allocated per
department (or branch), and this would be possible. Major Overhauling would
have t
28 matches
Mail list logo
