-Original Message-
From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
[mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Worley, Dale R
(Dale)
Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2011 1:17 PM
To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] ERR in sipregistrar log
__
The best thing you can do at this point is post the log file contents from when
this happens.
Look in the following log file: /var/log/sipxpbx/sipxivr.log
Josh Patten
Brazos County Network Engineer
979.361.4676
From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
[mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfo
From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
[sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Douglas Hubler
[dhub...@ezuce.com]
back to the topic... I once posted the idea of embedding sip viewer
right into admin ui, where one could drill into calls
From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
[sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Jeff Gilmore
[j...@thegilmores.net]
That is basically my point. There is no reference to sipx-response-correlator
anywhere on the WIKI, and a google searc
Only think similar I have ever had is PIN change failing when there were
SSL cert issues. That may not be helpful at all. It wasn't silent either
though.
On 4/6/2011 2:47 PM, Gabe Casey wrote:
Has anyone had this issue ?
4.2.1
*Gabrial Casey*
/Telecommunications/
Franklin American Mortgage Co
Has anyone had this issue ?
4.2.1
Gabrial Casey
Telecommunications
Franklin American Mortgage Company
501 Corporate Center Dr.
Suite 400
Franklin, TN 37067
Direct:615-468- 2945
Cell: 615-852-5015
Fax: 615-628-5698
Email:gca...@franklinamerican.com
___
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 2:55 PM, Tony Graziano
wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 2:54 PM, Tim Byng wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 2:11 PM, Tony Graziano wrote:
> >>
> >> Sure Tim.
> >>
> >> 192.168.1.10/32 Manual/Static
> >> If you PC's and phones are on DHCP and the DHCP range is definable...
>
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 2:54 PM, Tim Byng wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 2:11 PM, Tony Graziano wrote:
>>
>> Sure Tim.
>>
>> 192.168.1.10/32 Manual/Static
>> If you PC's and phones are on DHCP and the DHCP range is definable...
>>
>> 192.168.1.129-254 (dhcp range), then do 192.168.1.128/25 "automa
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 2:11 PM, Tony Graziano wrote:
> Sure Tim.
>
> 192.168.1.10/32 Manual/Static
> If you PC's and phones are on DHCP and the DHCP range is definable...
>
> 192.168.1.129-254 (dhcp range), then do 192.168.1.128/25 "automatic"
> and thusly
> 192.168.1.0/25 manual (split the differ
I've talked until blue in the face with those guys. The shaping is
very broken. I like where they are going, but the coding is just not
appealing "yet".
You can, however do rate limiting (cps) in both 1.2.3 and 2.0 for now
based on destination port. That does a lot to help.
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 2:05 PM, Tim Byng wrote:
> Hi Tony,
> Thanks for the feedback. I thought you would be the one replying to this
> question. :)
>
> On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 5:02 PM, Tony Graziano
> wrote:
>>
>> Your outbound nat type for the sip server should be Manual But not for the
>> whole
On 4/6/11 2:05 PM, Tim Byng wrote:
Hi Tony,
Thanks for the feedback. I thought you would be the one replying to
this question. :)
other issue (and, Tony, weigh in on this).. pfsense 2.0 is NOT ready for
prime time.. I think the QOS, is broken, right?
I did try it last month.
but, the layer7 f
Hi Tony,
Thanks for the feedback. I thought you would be the one replying to this
question. :)
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 5:02 PM, Tony Graziano
wrote:
> Your outbound nat type for the sip server should be Manual But not for the
> whole subnet Which should be automatic.
>
I think I understand what y
Thanks Dave - I have tried both of these - but I guess I must have
messed something else up as it's still not working. Unfortunately I am
away for a few weeks now so I will try on my return to get this to work.
Thanks to all who have suggested so far.
Laurie
From:
On Thu, 2011-03-31 at 10:55 +0200, Domenico Chierico wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-03-31 at 01:36 -0700, Todd R. Hodgen wrote:
> > I think your question is too broad and vague. I would go about it telling
> > what you did, what you expected to happen, and what did happen. I suspect
> > most people on he
15 matches
Mail list logo
