Of course I need to send profiles - But when its done, it starts failing in
different ways.Each time error is different. If I switch off one
server(redundant), and send profiels, it starts working again. Since its
failing in different ways, and dns is correct (i have rechecked hundreds of
Doubtful, there are customers running with more than 3 servers.
From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
[mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Nitin
Mirchandani
Sent: Saturday, April 14, 2012 12:14 AM
To: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] HA
Have you tried setting this up in a lab, with your three servers, and
sipXecs as the DNS to see how they play together. Get your lab successfully
built, and apply what you learn from that configuration to a network with
another DNS server setup.
From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
have many customers running with 3-5 servers...
your statement is incorrect. i would say that your installation is
unstable with more than 2 servers.
mike
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 3:14 AM, Nitin Mirchandani
nitin_mirchand...@hotmail.com wrote:
Of course I need to send profiles - But when
On 4/13/2012 8:20 PM, m...@grounded.net wrote:
I believe I saw a thread a while back where someone was asking about sending
faxes. Some searching shows that some have asked but that there are no plans.
Is this still the case or are others interested in this? Even a shared
outgoing account
Pointedly they dont have a way to use t38modem in a way that works.
Never have thats why noone uses hylafax in t38 deployments. You still
have to use hardware between hylafax and your t.38 switch. So if you
put up a separate hylafax box us an ATA and be done with it. It cant
really integrate.
The only thing that can raise issue is that the sites are connected via PPTP
VPN.Latency is sub 10ms. Will MS PPTP(the BEST implemetation so far - as it is
transparent to all protocols) be an issue? We had issues with OpenVPn which is
half ass implemetation. Does the tunnel (which sipx uses)
I would suspect ipsec would work well, we use it all the time for site to
site vpn's.
On Apr 14, 2012 10:46 AM, Nitin Mirchandani nitin_mirchand...@hotmail.com
wrote:
The only thing that can raise issue is that the sites are connected via
PPTP VPN.
Latency is sub 10ms.
Will MS PPTP(the BEST
First mention of a Tunnel between the servers. Again, I'd recommend you
get this working in a lab first, without a tunnel. Then add a tunnel
between servers and see if it breaks things. You will likely see what is
breaking it very quickly, and without guessing.
From:
You can simulate this inside but I think pptp is a poor choice in that the
packets use a different IP address to be native to the network.
IPSEC AND OPENVPN are more suited to point to point and can properly tested
with the same network schema before rolling the systems out and over a vpn.
Pptp
10 matches
Mail list logo
