Re: [sipx-users] MWI and Aastra

2012-08-07 Thread Tony Graziano
The first shows a user agent: User-Agent: Aastra/ZULTYS_ZIP 53i/3.2.2.2044 The second shows a user agent: User-Agent: Aastra 53i/3.2.2.2044 So the one that fails shows a firmware written for a specific platform? Again, showing only a snippet is not really that helpful. You really ought to

Re: [sipx-users] MWI and Aastra

2012-08-07 Thread Mark Dutton
In this instance a full trace won't be of much use. It simply ends with a 401 unauthorised reply on the failing endpoint. You can also ignore the different user agent strings in this instance. Zultys puts these in to enable functionality at the PBX based on the agent string. The actual firmware

Re: [sipx-users] MWI and Aastra

2012-08-07 Thread Tony Graziano
Actually, Aastra provides firmware customized for certain systems. The phone you indicated was 'broken was written specifically for the Zultys platform, while the other was not. Zultys does prefer hold, resume, park, paging, etc. to work a specific way. They may be subtle differences, but they are

Re: [sipx-users] MWI and Aastra

2012-08-07 Thread Mark Dutton
I did say exactly what I did to make it work in an earlier post. The problem was that the SipX provisioning software was not carrying the port = 0 variable in the device group server settings for registrar and proxy. Even though the device group profile has 0, the device profile still puts in

Re: [sipx-users] MWI and Aastra

2012-08-07 Thread Michael Picher
Not sure why nobody has patched it but this has been around since 3.10.x. I don't see a tracker item on it so that would be the place to start. http://track.sipfoundry.org This is a long-known issue with the Aastra config template. Patches are of course welcome. Mike On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at

Re: [sipx-users] MWI and Aastra

2012-08-07 Thread Tony Graziano
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 7:13 AM, Mark Dutton repl...@datamerge.com.auwrote: I did say exactly what I did to make it work in an earlier post. The problem was that the SipX provisioning software was not carrying the port = 0 variable in the device group server settings for registrar and proxy.

Re: [sipx-users] MWI and Aastra

2012-08-07 Thread Mark Dutton
I am using 4.4. I realised 4.6 is not ready for prime time. -- Regards Mark Dutton ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/

Re: [sipx-users] MWI and Aastra

2012-08-07 Thread Tony Graziano
but this also means the template was modified by the user or the defaults were changed somehow, because they default to 5060, which does work. So this issue is if it is set to 0 it does not behave as expected. While I agree ideally it would do a DNS lookup if set to port 5060, but would also need

Re: [sipx-users] MWI and Aastra

2012-08-07 Thread Mark Dutton
I am getting a little confused here Tony, but I will reiterate what I see. I think I am seeing what you are seeing. First time into a virgin devices groups / Aastra (55i say). Click into server settings then click on show advanced settings The proxy port, registrar port and outbound proxy

[sipx-users] SIPX T.38 fax Provider

2012-08-07 Thread Roman Gelfand
Sometime ago, Tony was looking for a t.38 fax provider. Is there a provider you could recommend. Thanks in advance ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/

Re: [sipx-users] SIPX T.38 fax Provider

2012-08-07 Thread Robert B
For termination, I've had excellent results from Endstream Communications. When you setup your gateway, just select that you want T.38. I'm still looking for a reliable T.38 origination provider. -- Robert On 8/7/2012 9:42 AM, Roman Gelfand wrote: Sometime ago, Tony was looking for a t.38

Re: [sipx-users] MWI and Aastra

2012-08-07 Thread Tony Graziano
I think that explains it clearer to me. So this is more aastra doesn't do srv and the template needs some TLC. Additionally the phone group setting has an unintended value with regard to the port that is projected. Do I understand this correctly? I think a JIRA would help. I am not clear that

Re: [sipx-users] MWI and Aastra

2012-08-07 Thread Robert B
For what it's worth, these sort of shenanigans are why I stopped dealing with Aastra phones... that and the build quality was not very convincing. -- Robert On 8/7/2012 5:30 AM, Tony Graziano wrote: Actually, Aastra provides firmware customized for certain systems. The phone you indicated

Re: [sipx-users] SIPX T.38 fax Provider

2012-08-07 Thread Tony Graziano
I have only used appia successfully for both thus far. I feel as though level 3 would not indicate an issue, but they have a complicated authentication function (they don't want you to register but want you to authenticate like a registration for outbound calls) if you can get around that. I

Re: [sipx-users] SIPX T.38 fax Provider

2012-08-07 Thread Robert B
I looked at Appia, and at the time they had a monthly commitment around $500, which made it difficult for smaller customers to use. This may have changed and if so, I'll reconsider. Flowroute and Gafachi, I've had the same experience with. I never liked Flowroute and their prices are too high.

Re: [sipx-users] SIPX T.38 fax Provider

2012-08-07 Thread Tony Graziano
Appia has changes hair minimums. ~~ Tony Graziano, Manager Telephone: 434.984.8430 sip: tgrazi...@voice.myitdepartment.net Fax: 434.465.6833 ~~ Linked-In Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/pub/tony-graziano/14/4a6/7a4 Ask about our Internet Fax services!

Re: [sipx-users] SIPX T.38 fax Provider

2012-08-07 Thread Michael Picher
and all bald guys rejoice. On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 1:37 PM, Tony Graziano tgrazi...@myitdepartment.netwrote: Appia has changes hair minimums. ~~ Tony Graziano, Manager Telephone: 434.984.8430 sip: tgrazi...@voice.myitdepartment.net Fax: 434.465.6833 ~~

Re: [sipx-users] SIPX T.38 fax Provider

2012-08-07 Thread Tony Graziano
Damn auto correct. Damn funny too except I am far from bald. ~~ Tony Graziano, Manager Telephone: 434.984.8430 sip: tgrazi...@voice.myitdepartment.net Fax: 434.465.6833 ~~ Linked-In Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/pub/tony-graziano/14/4a6/7a4 Ask about our

[sipx-users] sipxecs cluecon presentation

2012-08-07 Thread Douglas Hubler
http://goo.gl/u0NY8 ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/

Re: [sipx-users] sipxecs cluecon presentation

2012-08-07 Thread Noah Mehl
Thank you for posting this! ~Noah On Aug 7, 2012, at 3:39 PM, Douglas Hubler wrote: http://goo.gl/u0NY8 ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ Scanned for viruses

Re: [sipx-users] MWI and Aastra

2012-08-07 Thread Mark Dutton
I agree. Polycom phones are far better in a managed environment. Unfortunately, I have to use Aastra on a lot of my jobs. Robert B wrote on Tue, 07 August 2012 23:09 For what it's worth, these sort of shenanigans are why I stopped dealing with Aastra phones... that and the build quality

[sipx-users] Polycom VVX 500 support in 4.6

2012-08-07 Thread Philippe Laurent
Just installed 4.6 from ISO into a VM for testing, did all the yum updates. Setting up devices, and did not see the Polycom VVX 500 as a choice. Is there work needed to be done to do this? If so, what can I do to help? ___ sipx-users mailing list