I did say exactly what I did to make it work in an earlier post. The problem was that the SipX provisioning software was not carrying the port = 0 variable in the device group server settings for registrar and proxy. Even though the device group profile has 0, the device profile still puts in 5060 as a default. You have to go to each device individually and override the setting with 0. This then causes the handset to use the default port of 5060, but not to specify it in the URI. This then made the MWI server happy to auth it.
And I can tell you with all certainty that Zultys does not use a special firmware. I have been a Zultys beta tester for 5 years working with the dev guys. Aastra has a provisioning system where it goes to the Internet on first boot (after factory default) and looks up the mac address a database maintained by Aastra. Aastra then sends back certain identity information, such as the correct splash screen bitmap and agent string, etc. The actual firmware is direct from Aastra and is unmodified (in the Zultys case). What got my back up was that in my first post I asked what information to gather to send to the SipX forum and instead I was told to send a SIP log to Aastra. Believe me they would have absolutely no interest in even replying. I am new to SipX, but not to IP tel. I am not sure which logs give me what sort of information (apart from sipXproxy.log). I have been using sipx-trace and sipviewer (when necessary) to do my investigations to date. Where I came unstuck with this was that I did not know why I was getting an auth error. As it turned out, it was because the phone was subscribing with the port in the URI. From Joegen's post (the RFC excerpt), I could see that the port designator is a key part of a URI match and this is what SipX didn't like. However, if SipX was being strict, it should not have allowed the REGISTER, or INVITE methods either as these too were appending the port to the URI. One has to be pragmatic with SIP. There are so many "viewpoints" on what is legal. When it comes to Aastra, a large, isolationist company, or SipX, an open community, it is going to be the latter that is more likely to accomodate change than the former. Just the way of the world. -- Regards Mark Dutton _______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
