Re: [sipx-users] how to monitor call status & codec used on sipXbridge call ?

2011-05-19 Thread Carl Farrington
tatus & codec used on sipXbridge call ? On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 7:23 AM, Carl Farrington wrote: > Hi. I now have a trunk set up, and can make outgoing calls. > I am using the sipXbridge (Use built-in SIP Trunk SBC = yes). > I'm still a little confused by all the multitude o

[sipx-users] how to monitor call status & codec used on sipXbridge call ?

2011-05-18 Thread Carl Farrington
Hi. I now have a trunk set up, and can make outgoing calls. I am using the sipXbridge (Use built-in SIP Trunk SBC = yes). I'm still a little confused by all the multitude of SIP servers/proxies/clients running together. I entered fs_cli and could not see any active calls. I just want to see if g.7

Re: [sipx-users] localization voice prompts from 4.0 still OK for 4.4?

2011-05-17 Thread Carl Farrington
___ From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org [sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] on behalf of Douglas Hubler [dhub...@ezuce.com] Sent: 17 May 2011 03:47 To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software Subject: Re: [sipx-users] localization voice prompts from 4.0 still OK for 4.4? On Mon, May

[sipx-users] localization voice prompts from 4.0 still OK for 4.4?

2011-05-16 Thread Carl Farrington
Are the localized voice prompts (i.e. British English) from the 4.0 directory on the download server still OK for 4.4? Any known issues, or files that I might need to rename/symlink or anything? thanks, Carl ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.

Re: [sipx-users] system-wide phonebook

2011-05-16 Thread Carl Farrington
hones, except >for unmanned phones in lobbies, etc. and prefer to use Outlook Contacts for >directory services. From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org [mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Carl Farrington Sent: Monday, May 16, 2011 9:08 AM To: Discussion list f

Re: [sipx-users] system-wide phonebook

2011-05-16 Thread Carl Farrington
foundry.org [mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Carl Farrington Sent: Monday, May 16, 2011 10:59 AM To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software Subject: Re: [sipx-users] system-wide phonebook Hmm. If I don't include any groups in the group-list, and don't have

Re: [sipx-users] system-wide phonebook

2011-05-16 Thread Carl Farrington
st.sipfoundry.org [sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] on behalf of Carl Farrington [c...@css-networks.com] Sent: 16 May 2011 16:12 To: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org Subject: [sipx-users] system-wide phonebook How do I achieve a system-wide phonebook that contains stuff *other than* inte

[sipx-users] system-wide phonebook

2011-05-16 Thread Carl Farrington
How do I achieve a system-wide phonebook that contains stuff *other than* internal users? If I create users, and have them in the member-group of a phonebook, then they go into that phonebook, but I can hardly have my clients add their external contacts as users. It seems that the admin users

Re: [sipx-users] Recommended NIC configuration, and extension numbering scheme.

2011-05-11 Thread Carl Farrington
connection 4 it. On May 11, 2011 9:16 PM, "Carl Farrington" mailto:c...@css-networks.com>> wrote: > Thanks. There will be a dedicated adsl2+ annex-m just for voice. I'll use a > reasonable router firewall - mikrotik rb750g looks worth a shot. I have good > expe

Re: [sipx-users] Recommended NIC configuration, and extension numbering scheme.

2011-05-11 Thread Carl Farrington
e you only have a single small connection you should also enact adequate traffic shaping on your firewall to ensure voice traffic gets priority. On May 11, 2011 6:44 PM, "Carl Farrington" mailto:c...@css-networks.com>> wrote: > Can somebody give me some recommendations on NIC

Re: [sipx-users] Recommended NIC configuration, and extension numbering scheme.

2011-05-11 Thread Carl Farrington
and stole their capacitor formula. The formula they stole wasn't complete. They pass the initial test, but swell/bulge prematurely. -Original Message- From: Carl Farrington Sender: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 23:35:30 To: Discussion list for users

Re: [sipx-users] Recommended NIC configuration, and extension numbering scheme.

2011-05-11 Thread Carl Farrington
g. From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org [mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Carl Farrington Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2011 4:19 PM To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Recommended NIC configuration, and extension numbering sch

Re: [sipx-users] Recommended NIC configuration, and extension numbering scheme.

2011-05-11 Thread Carl Farrington
ilto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Carl Farrington Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2011 3:46 PM To: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org Subject: [sipx-users] Recommended NIC configuration, and extension numbering scheme. Can somebody give me some recommendations on NIC configuration

[sipx-users] Recommended NIC configuration, and extension numbering scheme.

2011-05-11 Thread Carl Farrington
Can somebody give me some recommendations on NIC configuration on a small (15 user) deployment with a dedicated DSL line for the ITSP trunk? My background is really in Asterisk & FreePBX, and I have to date configured those systems with a dedicated WAN NIC, and either a separate LAN for the hand