02
>with no timeout problems.
>
>Stiles
>
>Dan McDaniel wrote:
>> Stiles,
>> They haven't resolved it yet. I'm just working around the issue for the
>> time being while I consider moving to another ISTP. I like Flowroute,
>> but perhaps they are
on this?
>
>Stiles
>
>Dan McDaniel wrote:
>> Yes, we are still working on this, but it's not resolved yet. Turns out
>> that 30 minutes (1800 seconds) is the time in the Session Timer Interval
>> box on the gateway setup screen. It controls what goes into the Session
ed: timer,100rel
>Record-Route:
>Record-Route:
>Content-Length: 171
>
>v=0
>o=- 28654 7320 IN IP4 64.194.139.61
>s=-
>c=IN IP4 64.194.139.61
>t=0 0
>m=audio 30890 RTP/AVP 0 101
>a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000
>a=fmtp:101 0-15
>a=ptime:20
>
>
>On
he archives for FLOWROUTE TIMER and you will
see what others using them have already discovered.
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 12:25 PM, Dan McDaniel wrote:
Sorry if I'm being a little dense here, but where do they say they don't
support the timer? I see a "Supported: timer,100rel&q
-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
>
>To: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
>Sent: Thu Nov 11 09:59:46 2010
>Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Session timer refresh
>
>The ISTP is Flowroute.
>
>On Thu 11.Nov.10 08:08, Michael Picher wrote:
>>who is the itsp?
>>
>>On Th
t;yet they send an OK.
>
>This is something you should take up with the ITSP if this is the case.
>
>On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 12:01 AM, Dan McDaniel wrote:
>
>>
>> I'm looking at a case where sipx doesn't appear to be refreshing the
>> session timer. It go
The ISTP is Flowroute.
On Thu 11.Nov.10 08:08, Michael Picher wrote:
>who is the itsp?
>
>On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 12:01 AM, Dan McDaniel wrote:
>
>>
>> I'm looking at a case where sipx doesn't appear to be refreshing the
>> session timer. It goes like
I'm looking at a case where sipx doesn't appear to be refreshing the
session timer. It goes like this:
1. sipx sends a SE header (Session-Expires: 1800;refresher=uac) in the INVITE
2. the ISTP confirms this arrangement in the 200 OK
3. sipx fails to refresh the timer
4. the ISTP even
Tony, I sent a trace and pcap on Friday via PM. Did you ever receive it?
Dan
On Fri 15.Oct.10 14:36, Tony Graziano wrote:
>I can try to look at this if you want to share it.
>
>On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 2:27 PM, Dan McDaniel wrote:
>
>> There's no template for Flowroute.
t;>
>>>LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk:
>>>Telephone: 434.984.8426
>>>Fax: 434.984.8427
>>>
>>>Helpdesk Contract Customers:
>>>http://www.myitdepartment.net/gethelp/
>>>
>>>- Original Message -
>>>From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
>>>
>>>To: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
>>>Sent: Thu Oct 14 17:00:13 2010
>>>Subject: [sipx-users] system configs
>>>
>>>I'm still working with Flowroute on a dropped call problem. They have
>>>setup a SipX test system, but are not able to duplicate the problem.
>>>They would like me to send my configuration files so they can load them
>>>into their system.
>>>
>>>1. Is this possible? What would I need to send, and is there a way to
>>>only include the config for the Flowroute gateway?
>>>
>>>2. What are the security/privacy worries with doing this?
>>>
>>
>>--
>>Dan McDaniel
>>d...@dm3.us
___
sipx-users mailing list
sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
===
>>>Tony Graziano, Manager
>>>Telephone: 434.984.8430
>>>Fax: 434.984.8431
>>>
>>>Email: tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net
>>>
>>>LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk:
>>>Telephone: 434.984.8426
>>>Fax:
[sipx-users] system configs
>>
>>I'm still working with Flowroute on a dropped call problem. They have
>>setup a SipX test system, but are not able to duplicate the problem.
>>They would like me to send my configuration files so they can load the
0
>Subject: [sipx-users] system configs
>
>I'm still working with Flowroute on a dropped call problem. They have
>setup a SipX test system, but are not able to duplicate the problem.
>They would like me to send my configuration files so they can load them
>into their system.
>
a way to
only include the config for the Flowroute gateway?
2. What are the security/privacy worries with doing this?
--
Dan McDaniel
d...@dm3.us
Key fingerprint = CAEC B8D9 3701 86CF D3B2 1E99 D8BB F217 455C AD36
___
sipx-users mailing list
sipx-
County Government,
>203 South Fourth Street, Courthouse, Oakland, Maryland 21550
>www.garrettcounty.org
>___
>sipx-users mailing list
>sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
>List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
>
Same here. F
back.
Dan
On Tue 12.Oct.10 10:49, Stiles Watson wrote:
>Dan,
>
>Did you ever hear back from flowroute on this issue? I also have calls
>dropping at 30 min. I've created a support ticket for this as well.
>
>Stiles
>
>Dan McDaniel wrote:
>> On Mon 06.Sep.10 09:04,
utes. :-(
I updated the ticket and am waiting to hear back from them.
--
Dan McDaniel
d...@dm3.us
Key fingerprint = CAEC B8D9 3701 86CF D3B2 1E99 D8BB F217 455C AD36
___
sipx-users mailing list
sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
Maybe /etc/sipxpbx/polycom/mac-address.cfg.vm? It looks similar.
On Thu 16.Sep.10 16:01, Matthew Kitchin (public/usenet) wrote:
> I've looked in /etc/sipxpbx/polycom/mac-address.d/
>and none of those files seem to be what I am looking for. None of them
>contain the string .cfg or c
6
>>>sip: helpd...@voice.myitdepartment.net
>>><mailto:helpd...@voice.myitdepartment.net>
>>>Fax: 434.984.8427
>>>
>>>Helpdesk Contract Customers:
>>>http://www.myitdepartment.net/gethelp/
>>>
>>>Why do mathematician
how to interpret the statement from flowroute, because it is
>> >confusing, as you DONT WANT them to try to traverse NAT for you in a
>> >properly installed and configured system with sipxbridge behind NAT.
>> >
>> >Verify the above settings.
>> >
>>
P (Flowroute)
>>> sends a BYE after 20 minutes and the call ends. Is this more likely to
>>> be a configuration problem on my end or a problem with the ISTP? Just
>>> looking for pointers on where to start troubleshooting.
>>>
>>> I'
>Tony Graziano, Manager
>Telephone: 434.984.8430
>Fax: 434.984.8431
>
>Email: tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net
>
>LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk:
>Telephone: 434.984.8426
>Fax: 434.984.8427
>
>Helpdesk Contract Customers:
>http://www.myitde
sn't pick up the group settings.
>
>Does anyone have suggestions for fixing this?
>
>Dan McDaniel
___
sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users
Unsubscri
Yes, it's in the one and only group. Still doesn't work.
On Wed 20.Jan.10 14:48, Michael Scheidell wrote:
>Try making sure you are in only ONE group, and its CasE sensitive.
>
>
>--
>Michael Scheidell, CTO
>Phone: 561-999-5000, x 1259
>> *| *SECNAP Network Security Corporation
>
> * Certified S
On Wed 13.Jan.10 16:24, Dale Worley wrote:
>On Tue, 2010-01-12 at 20:17 -0700, Dan McDaniel wrote:
>> On Mon 11.Jan.10 15:18, Dale Worley wrote:
>> >On Sun, 2010-01-10 at 23:00 -0700, dan wrote:
>> >> I've set up an old SPA2002 to do some testing. It registers
On Wed 13.Jan.10 16:24, Dale Worley wrote:
>On Tue, 2010-01-12 at 20:17 -0700, Dan McDaniel wrote:
>> On Mon 11.Jan.10 15:18, Dale Worley wrote:
>> >On Sun, 2010-01-10 at 23:00 -0700, dan wrote:
>> >> I've set up an old SPA2002 to do some testing. It registers
(softphone on PC)
211 (Sipura 2002)
201, 202, and 220 can all call each other and they can call 211. Ext
211 cannot call the others, but it can call 100 and 101 successfully.
Dan McDaniel
___
sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List
On Tue 05.Jan.10 09:57, dan wrote:
>On Tue 05.Jan.10 11:21, M. Ranganathan wrote:
>>On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 11:12 AM, Dan McDaniel wrote:
>>> As a follow-on question, when I look at the trace with sipviewer, which
>>> component should be talking to the ISTP? I'm see
As a follow-on question, when I look at the trace with sipviewer, which
component should be talking to the ISTP? I'm seeing sip-proxy contacting
the ISTP. Shouldn't sipxbridge be doing that?
On Mon 04.Jan.10 20:59, Dan McDaniel wrote:
>I'm trying to get my Vitelity trunk workin
then vitelity replies with a RST, ACK (indicating, I think,
that nothing is listening on that port.) Not quite sure what to look at
next and suggestions would be welcome.
--
Dan McDaniel
___
sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List Ar
gt;
>I'm trying to upgrade the firmware in my Polycom 501. I did this
>successfully last spring when I started using Sipx, but now I can't get
>it to work. I've extracted the new files into the tftpboot directory,
>but the phone is not picking them up. Wha
>
>>Firmware above 3.1.3 is not suggested.
>>
>>
>>On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 12:53 PM, dan wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> I'm trying to upgrade the firmware in my Polycom 501. I did this
>>> successfully last spring when I started using Sipx, but now
On Thu 05.Nov.09 17:32, Tony Graziano wrote:
>Manually edit the repo file and change 5.2 to 5.
>
>Yum clean all
>Yum update
Thanks. That got yum working again. Then I reinstalled
sipxecs-release.i386, and that fixed the missing information in
lsb_release.
Dan
_
Stefan,
Thanks for the reply, but I'm still a little confused. I did a new
install of 4.0.2 on a test system. Then I tried to do a "yum update"
which failed since none of the Centos 5.2 repos are available any
longer.
How are we to update the system, or install additional packages?
Dan
On Mon 02
-report-4.0.2-016420.i386.rpm is not signed
>
>Has anyone else seen this? How do I get around it?
>
>--
>Dan McDaniel
>d...@dm3.us
>Key fingerprint = E295 0313 A68F B6D6 FF33 DE51 27F2 9B91 F68A 1241
>___
>sipx-users mailing list s
35 matches
Mail list logo
