Re: [sipx-users] bandwidth.com problems

e or issues I would like that self assurance that our main line can still get to our answering service if it can't get to us. Thanks From: Warren K. Wiemer [mailto:wwie...@warrentek.com] Sent: Friday, June 25, 2010 8:05 AM To: Nathan Nieblas Cc: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org

[sipx-users] bandwidth.com problems

Anyone having a problem with Bandwidth.com right now? ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PB

Re: [sipx-users] message queue is over half full

Y, Dale R (Dale) [mailto:dwor...@avaya.com] Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 1:03 PM To: Nathan Nieblas; keccles Cc: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org Subject: RE: [sipx-users] message queue is over half full From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org [

Re: [sipx-users] message queue is over half full

em is currently running 4.2.0-018575 -Original Message- From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org [mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of WORLEY, Dale R (Dale) Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 6:17 AM To: Nathan Nieblas; sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org Subject: Re: [sipx-

Re: [sipx-users] message queue is over half full

-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of keccles Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 6:49 AM To: Nathan Nieblas Cc: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org Subject: Re: [sipx-users] message queue is over half full On Wed, 2010-05-26 at 13:27 -0700, Nathan Nieblas wrote: > Still getting this mad scrolling in the logs wit

[sipx-users] message queue is over half full

Still getting this mad scrolling in the logs with parked calls on 4.2. Any ideas? Is there a way to increase the queue size? "2010-05-26T20:22:54.495213Z":9384181:KERNEL:NOTICE:pbx01.um.sacatech.co m:WAVDecoder-556:B27EFB90:sipxpark:"OsMsgQShared::doSendCore message queue '' is over half full -

[sipx-users] call park pickup with bria

Anything special with the Bria soft phone to get it to pick up parked calls? The error when dialing is "call cannot be established". I've tried with *4xxx and also created a dial plan that rewrites *4xxx when dialing xxx. At least the presence is working now though J Thanks __

[sipx-users] openfire presense (x-lite & cisco)

It appears that the presence function in the IM portion does not recognize line status for users on X-lite 3 or 4 and any Cisco phone. Is there something specific that is missing or can be configured on these phones to point to? I assumed it was a backend function between openfire and sipx directly

Re: [sipx-users] call park dropped calls - 4.2

hanks -Original Message- From: M. Ranganathan [mailto:mra...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2010 6:11 AM To: Nathan Nieblas Cc: Tony Graziano; sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org Subject: Re: [sipx-users] call park dropped calls - 4.2 On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 5:53 PM, Nathan Nieblas wrote: >

[sipx-users] openfire log path

Anyone see a problem with this and what it should be? This was an upgrade from 4.0 to 4.2 [r...@pbx01 openfire]# ls -l lrwxrwxrwx 1 sipxchange root 26 Apr 20 15:41 openfire -> /var/log/sipxpbx/openfire/ [r...@pbx01 openfire]# pwd /var/log/sipxpbx/openfire/openfire/openfire/openfire __

Re: [sipx-users] call park dropped calls - 4.2

while it was happening though. -Original Message- From: Tony Graziano [mailto:tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net] Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 2:48 PM To: Nathan Nieblas; sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org Subject: Re: [sipx-users] call park dropped calls - 4.2 What is your default logging level

[sipx-users] call park dropped calls - 4.2

acatech.c om:WAVDecoder-38:B1FF6B90:sipxpark:"OsMsgQShared::doSendCore message queue '' is over half full - count = 1599, max = 1600" "2010-04-27T21:24:04.252011Z":38166292:KERNEL:NOTICE:pbx01.um.sacatech.c om:WAVDecoder-585:B12E9B90:sipxpark:"OsMsgQShared::doSen

Re: [sipx-users] Cisco and sipX 4.2

ess I will just replace my Cisco's with Polycom's before asking for any more help. Regards Nathan Nieblas SACA Technologies, Inc. From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org [mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Michael Scheidell Sent: Friday, April

Re: [sipx-users] Cisco and sipX 4.2

e call (if that even makes sense). Nathan Nieblas SACA Technologies, Inc. 1260 N. Hancock Street, Suite 102 Anaheim Hills, CA 92807 p: 714-777-3222 x113 f: 888-603-9033 e: nathan.nieb...@sacatech.com From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org [mailto:sipx-users-boun...@lis

Re: [sipx-users] Cisco and sipX 4.2

Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2010 6:01 AM To: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Cisco and sipX 4.2 >>> On 4/19/2010 at 08:44 PM, in message , "Nathan Nieblas" wrote: > Ran into some firmware compatibility issues after upgrading from 4.0 to > 4.2 >

[sipx-users] Cisco and sipX 4.2

Polycom calling the Cisco phone issues again. Just FYI... If anyone has anything to share Cisco related I'm all ears J Nathan Nieblas SACA Technologies, Inc. 1260 N. Hancock Street, Suite 102 Anaheim Hills, CA 92807 p: 714-777-3222 x113 f: 888-603-9033 e: nathan

Re: [sipx-users] call drops after call park

upgrading as simple as changing the yum repo's? Regards Nathan Nieblas SACA Technologies, Inc. 1260 N. Hancock Street, Suite 102 Anaheim Hills, CA 92807 p: 714-777-3222 x113 f: 888-603-9033 e: nathan.nieb...@sacatech.com -Original Message- From: M. Ranganathan [mailt

Re: [sipx-users] call drops after call park

nected. Nathan Nieblas SACA Technologies, Inc. 1260 N. Hancock Street, Suite 102 Anaheim Hills, CA 92807 p: 714-777-3222 x113 f: 888-603-9033 e: nathan.nieb...@sacatech.com -Original Message- From: M. Ranganathan [mailto:mra...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2010 12:28 PM To:

[sipx-users] call drops after call park

This happens with and without hold music enabled on sipXbridge with both Cisco and Polycom phones. Any ideas? Using bandwidth.com as my ITSP. Nathan Nieblas SACA Technologies, Inc. 1260 N. Hancock Street, Suite 102 Anaheim Hills, CA 92807 p: 714-777-3222 x113 f: 888-603-9033

Re: [sipx-users] Is this how dial plan is meant to work?

f the box functionality with Cisco products, mainly exhaust all possible matches until there is an exact match (think ACL's). Nathan Nieblas SACA Technologies, Inc. 1260 N. Hancock Street, Suite 102 Anaheim Hills, CA 92807 p: 714-777-3222 x113 f: 888-603-9033 e: nathan.nieb...@sa

Re: [sipx-users] [Fwd: XX-7800 Change the default location of the shared user check box]

as enabled - then it would show up with everything else when editing a user (if that's even possible). Nathan Nieblas SACA Technologies, Inc. 1260 N. Hancock Street, Suite 102 Anaheim Hills, CA 92807 p: 714-777-3222 x113 f: 888-603-9033 e: nathan.nieb...@sacatech.c

Re: [sipx-users] CFwd NA Timeout

All I have is "Extension NNN will ring first." I remember seeing of this feature in the upcoming 4.1.x release but not 4.0.4 - is there something in the backend that can be changed, even at a global level for all extensions? Nathan Nieblas SACA Technologies, Inc. 1260

[sipx-users] CFwd NA Timeout

Using 4.0.4, is there any way to change the forward no answer duration on an extension? Nathan Nieblas SACA Technologies, Inc. 1260 N. Hancock Street, Suite 102 Anaheim Hills, CA 92807 p: 714-777-3222 x113 f: 888-603-9033 e: nathan.nieb...@sacatech.com <mailto:nathan.n

Re: [sipx-users] Cisco 7941G 7970G drops registration

I noticed that the records created when running the DNS server on sipX does not create an A record for the sip domain itself, once I added that my phones would stay registered. Nathan Nieblas SACA Technologies, Inc. 1260 N. Hancock Street, Suite 102 Anaheim Hills, CA 92807 p

Re: [sipx-users] Cisco 7941G 7970G drops registration

Make sure the phones can resolve your sip domain. I am also running on 8.5.x code with no issues other than not being able to receive calls from Polycoms (which is Polycom's problem IMO). Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T -Original Message- From: Ben Wannan Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 17:32:45 T

Re: [sipx-users] Cisco 7941G 7970G drops registration

What version firmware are you running? Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T -Original Message- From: Ben Wannan Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 16:38:55 To: Subject: [sipx-users] Cisco 7941G 7970G drops registration ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@lis

[sipx-users] IVR Schedule

x27;t want to work the way my Cisco mind does it in Unity. So is it just me or is scheduling simply broke across the board? Thanks Nathan Nieblas SACA Technologies, Inc. 1260 N. Hancock Street, Suite 102 Anaheim Hills, CA 92807 p: 714-777-3222 x113 f: 888-603-9033 e: n

[sipx-users] Roadmap for Multi-tenant?

Is sipX on it's way to being multi-tenant friendly? Any ETA on this? I want to replace Cisco Callmanager someday. Thanks Nathan Nieblas SACA Technologies, Inc. 1260 N. Hancock Street, Suite 102 Anaheim Hills, CA 92807 p: 714-777-3222 x113 f: 888-603-9033 e: nathan

Re: [sipx-users] Is my Cisco ASA configurations correct?

And I don't know how to paste I guess... Unmangled version: http://www.pastebin.ca/1743041 Nathan Nieblas SACA Technologies, Inc. 1260 N. Hancock Street, Suite 102 Anaheim Hills, CA 92807 p: 714-777-3222 x113 f: 888-603-9033 e: nathan.nieb...@sacatech.com -Original Message-

Re: [sipx-users] Is my Cisco ASA configurations correct?

bal_policy class inspection_default no inspect sip ! Nathan Nieblas SACA Technologies, Inc. 1260 N. Hancock Street, Suite 102 Anaheim Hills, CA 92807 p: 714-777-3222 x113 f: 888-603-9033 e: nathan.nieb...@sacatech.com -Original Message- From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipf

Re: [sipx-users] Brain picking

in to everyone who got me going in the right direction. Nathan Nieblas SACA Technologies, Inc. 1260 N. Hancock Street, Suite 102 Anaheim Hills, CA 92807 p: 714-777-3222 x113 f: 888-603-9033 e: nathan.nieb...@sacatech.com -Original Message- From: Picher, Michael [mailto

Re: [sipx-users] Brain picking

Cool, I've disabled it - I am really looking forward to no problems come morning. I'm assuming sipXproxy/sipXbridge behaves nicely with their built in NAT functionality then with remote clients, etc? Nathan Nieblas SACA Technologies, Inc. -Original Message- From: Piche

Re: [sipx-users] Brain picking

It's a Cisco ASA 5510. I have now disabled port randomization for the NAT, looks like the media control ports 3-31000 are pretty important and need to stay the same. I attempted to turn off the NAT functions within sipX (based on an archived post you made) but it appears to break DTMF on the

Re: [sipx-users] Brain picking

I have been all over the wiki. Pieced a bunch of stuff together, none seem to fit my scenario just right. For example, I am delivering calls from bandwidth.com to sipXbridge on port 5080. sipX is sitting with a private ip behind a sip aware firewall. My phones can communicate with sipX without

[sipx-users] Brain picking

Anyone willing to let me pick their brain so I can get my setup working 100%? Thanks ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/l

Re: [sipx-users] No audio problem in both sides doing outgoingcalls using voicetrading.com as ITSP

Hey Tony, I'm curious when Internet calling should/should not be enabled Can you shed some light on this? Thanks -Original Message- From: Tony Graziano Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 10:08:04 To: Cc: Subject: Re: [sipx-users] No audio problem in both sides doing outgoing calls usi

Re: [sipx-users] multi site deployment

way audio, unable to pickup a ringing call (on a Cisco). -Original Message- From: Dale Worley [mailto:dwor...@avaya.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2010 8:27 AM To: Nathan Nieblas Cc: Picher, Michael; Todd Hodgen; sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org Subject: Re: [sipx-users] multi site deployme

Re: [sipx-users] multi site deployment

Confirmed 8.2.2SR4 resolves the 406 issue. 3491672850*# is my friend. From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org [mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Nathan Nieblas Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2010 2:01 AM To: Todd Hodgen; sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org Subject: Re

Re: [sipx-users] multi site deployment

p.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2010 1:54 AM To: Todd Hodgen; Nathan Nieblas; sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org Subject: RE: [sipx-users] multi site deployment "My guess is that you do not have a single problem here, but several small ones." Not the least of which could be running si

Re: [sipx-users] multi site deployment

...@verizon.net] Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2010 12:01 AM To: Nathan Nieblas; sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org Subject: RE: [sipx-users] multi site deployment Nathan, The best thing to do right now is to get a complete trace of these failed calls. Clear your logs, regenerate the failed calls

Re: [sipx-users] multi site deployment

ld not go past as well? I have the phones on 8.5.2 right now. This page is obviously a little outdated: http://sipx-wiki.calivia.com/index.php/HowTo_configure_Cisco_SIP_phone_w ith_sipX Thanks From: Josh Patten [mailto:jpat...@co.brazos.tx.us] Sent: Monday, January 04, 2010 9:07 PM To: N

Re: [sipx-users] multi site deployment

on is that the firewall is essentially handling the SIP protocol for translation sanity (since it's being NAT'd) and security. -Original Message- From: Josh Patten [mailto:jpat...@co.brazos.tx.us] Sent: Monday, January 04, 2010 8:21 PM To: Nathan Nieblas Cc: sipx-users@list.sipfoun

[sipx-users] multi site deployment

ocal sipXbridge and I have SIP inspection also being done over that port with the ASA. I have nothing special configured for inspection. What could I be doing wrong here? Nathan Nieblas SACA Technologies, Inc. ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sip

Re: [sipx-users] Polycom firmware upgrade

Are you using the combined or split files? Are the new files world readable in the directory? --Original Message-- From: dan Sender: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org To: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org Subject: [sipx-users] Polycom firmware upgrade Sent: Jan 3, 2010 9:53 AM I'm try

Re: [sipx-users] Cisco 7970 Lost Registration

e now. Thanks for the help. Nathan Nieblas SACA Technologies, Inc. From: Tony Graziano [mailto:tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net] Sent: Saturday, January 02, 2010 5:22 PM To: gabriel Cc: Nathan Nieblas; sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org Subject: Re: [sipx-

[sipx-users] Cisco 7970 Lost Registration

pX generated config files and TFTP. Thanks Nathan Nieblas SACA Technologies, Inc. ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/ma