Cannot log into http://wiki.sipfoundry.org/dologin.action, keep being asked to
validate yet system won't accept any of the words that it is generating as
input. Constantly says;
>>You are required to validate your login by entering the word below.
Anyone else or is it just me?
> Meanwhile - install an audio player on the machine you are trying to
> listen voicemail, then when you see "Only external Audio Player is
Yes, that worked from the start, just wondered if there was anything that could
be done with IE.
No big deal, just good to be aware so that we can pass on t
> Thanks, will provide a fix with http://track.sipfoundry.org/browse/XX-9207
This will provide a chrome fix but is there a certain update or add on to make
it work in EI or perhaps only a later version?
___
sipx-users mailing list
sipx-users@list.sipf
> Only external Audio Player is supported
Make that the above error when using IE, version 8 no less. Is there an addon
required for IE?
Re: [sipx-users] IE8 Voicemail Player - Only external player is supported.
I did find a thread from Aug 2010 talking about this but not much else. Is
there a
I have sipx wrapped into a window on a separate web server.
When I go to the Inbox and lick on the play button to listen to a message, I
get;
Only external Audio Player is supported
Is this because the message is not actually being played from sipx since it's
in a wrapper on another web
> operating system based static routes are one of those things (specially in
> windows machines) that gets overlooked... and also causes headaches when
> you're trying to diagnose network problems and one or two machines are
> behaving totally different than others!
> to each their own though...
On Tue, 9 Nov 2010 05:09:50 -0500, Michael Picher wrote:
> You're almost always better off doing your routing in routers (imagine
> that)... rather than leaving it up to individual hosts.
Like you say,'almost'. Sometimes it's simpler to just add a small function on a
server.
Figured it's worth
One interesting thing I've noticed is that flowroute times out regularly for
seconds every day, randomly. Sometimes, as much as minutes at a time.
Our main firewall has a monitoring function where you can enter various remote
IP addresses and a report is generated when a network cannot be reach
> You can also leave the server untouched and add a route on your (SIP/RTP)
> default-gateway (192.168.1.6):
>
> ip route 172.16.30.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.1.1.
> This solution has the advantage that the SipX box can be
> replaced/rebuild/upgraded etc without having to think about the routing.
G
> This is just plain routing on linux and does not really have anything to do
> with sipx.
I posted this on sipx list because this is where the sipx experts are who would
know if there might be problems in doing this, specifically with this software.
_
> When you use this command:
> route add -net 172.16.30.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 gw 192.168.1.1
>
> All Traffic sent by your sipx that is destined to the network 172.16.30.0
> is sent over the gateway 192.168.1.1 all other traffic is not affected at
> all.
To confirm then, traffic originated from
Is that what you wanted to know? Does it better explain what I am trying to
achieve?
___
sipx-users mailing list
sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
> Why are there 2 Gateways in the Network of your sipx? Which nets are they
> connected to?
I have several gateways on the network, each for it's own traffic to prevent
packets flowing on to network segments they don't belong on. It's also a
security measure of course.
> If there is only one sp
> With an "appliance" you would need IPSEC so it auto connects or s "site-to-
> site" or automated connection to the HOST from the USER.
> What you dont want id the user to have to login to a router and initiate
> the connection. If they are using a software based phone that's not an
> issue.
So n
> wouldn openwrt do this too?
Ever use the pfsense openvpn module Tony?
Would eliminate a lot of the crummy router issues by using vpn enabled devices.
Then again, I guess it still ends up being the same as putting something in
between their provider and router else have to deal with their router
Are there any problems with adding a second route to sipx?
For example, I have a box which has it's gateway as 192.168.1.6 but I need it's
port 8443 traffic to reply to 192.168.1.1.
In fact, I need only the web interface to reply to 192.168.1.1, everything else
remains 192.168.1.6.
The system i
> Try anything running openwrt
> Very flexible, hardware can be $50.
I have it installed on one of the wireless linksys gateways we use for testing.
I think one of the cheapest devices would be a linksys but at that point, might
as well just use the linksys OS.
__
> pfsense requires an intel processor. They make 2/3 port flash nano
> versions, but the hardware is 200 dollars.
There's got to be something else out there, just haven't seen it. Hate using a
full size router for such a small function.
___
sipx-users
> as long as you can turn off SPI and SIP ALG...
>> I basically need to find a low cost in-between solution like above, like
>> the linksys BEFSR41 but even simpler, less features.
On their router, yes. But I'd love to find a small device I could use as a
simple pass-through between the users pr
>You haven't given up on that stupid thing yet?
Sometimes, the user doesn't want to buy or change their hardware so the only
cure is to walk in with yet another router, put that on their provider, then
our phone on our router, then their router on ours.
> Any firewall you cannot control is a u
> I'd forget the security thing frankly.
> Jetty is damn skippy in the security department.
> http://docs.codehaus.org/display/JETTY/Jetty+Security
Just want to edit the messages, not make any changes to anything.
I prefer to hide information which helps hackers.
> He wants to redirect to a different page because he wants them to go
> through a reverse proxy or some such thing.
Actually, I want to limit the amount of information which is shown to limit
hacker knowledge.
I obfuscate the URL using proxy but just in case something does show, I want
the lea
>> Can anyone tell me where the following error is generated from?
>> I've been using grep to find it but can't find it anywhere.
>>
>> Error 404 - Not Found.
>> No context on this server matched or handled this request.
>> Contexts known to this server are:
>>
>> * WebApplicationContext[/cmcpr
Can anyone tell me where the following error is generated from?
I've been using grep to find it but can't find it anywhere.
Error 404 - Not Found.
No context on this server matched or handled this request.
Contexts known to this server are:
* WebApplicationContext[/cmcprov,sipXconfig-cmc
> Simply put, what you DONT want to see is someone behind nat that does not
> have the x-sipX-privcontact tag in their registration.
>
> This is what I believe you have said. So I don't understand your question.
Just trying to confirm this.
The weirdness is that no matter changing the device NAT
user1 "user1"
user2 "user2"
user3
"user3"
user4
"user4"
These are remote users.
User1 is connected as should be for a remote, everything works fine. His
registration status shows sipX-nonat.
User2 is also remote, he cannot hear rings because of a problem with his
firewall so we've ordered a n
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0euvNry0zuk apparently the GXV3140 can do
> 3 way vid conferencing too. Will be neat to try.
Are you still happy with the above phones?
Old thread but these things are still sitting on my shelf and am wondering if
anyone ever got their 1535's to work remote with
On Tue, 19 Oct 2010 07:20:19 -0400, Michael Picher wrote:
> Well, the phone is going to start ringing as soon as it gets the ringing
> message...
When we call from pstn to any sip phone connected to sipx, there doesn't seem
to be a delay.
Sometimes it's just one ring, most times it's two rings.
On Mon, 18 Oct 2010 22:21:15 -0700, Todd Hodgen wrote:
> The ring has very little meaning, it's a wav file played by the phone, much
> like in the analog world - the number of rings you hear in your ear is not
We thought this also but it's something that seems to make users think there's
somethin
On Tue, 19 Oct 2010 01:07:07 -0400, Tony Graziano wrote:
> dont know its a problem, its the general behavior,
> dont know that they can or will do anything about it.
I've put a ticket in just the same. If it's something they can fix, all the
better. Any little delays here and there could add up s
On Tue, 19 Oct 2010 00:44:21 -0400, Tony Graziano wrote:
> I would not expect a digital gateway to do this. What you are seeing is
> "call setup time" with the TELCO.
I was wondering about a function called WaitForDialTime.
///
WaitForDialTime: determines the delay between the time the line is s
The 2000, running v5.6
I
On Tue, 19 Oct 2010 00:29:24 -0400, Tony Graziano wrote:
> which mediant?
>
> On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 12:25 AM, m...@grounded.net
> wrote:
>> When we dial out to pstn using a sip phone on sipx, we notice there are
>> always two rings on the s
When we dial out to pstn using a sip phone on sipx, we notice there are always
two rings on the sip phone before the pstn connected phone rings.
Is this a mediant setting or something in sipx? I'm guessing mediant.
Mike
___
sipx-users mailing list
si
Searching the wiki, I don't seem to come across much on how to customize the
look of the user screen in terms of html.
In fact, I had also posted another question asking how I could remove an html
error message but didn't see a reply.
Since the server doesn't seem to be using standard html, not
I have a bunch of these routers which are open but don't seem to have DNS SRV
on them. Their firmware is from 2006 so I was wondering if someone here might
have newer firmware for them so I don't have to junk them and can use them with
sipx.
Much appreciated.
Mike
> I think I have a functional fail2ban working with sipx. Your can
> download my fail2ban config from:
> http://www.drouillard.biz/sipx_fail2ban.tar.gz
Thanks very much, I'll take a look at this.
___
sipx-users mailing list
sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.
> I have a how to for this on my blog which will also help limit some other
> things. I think its the first article.
>
> http://blog.myitdepartment.net
Haha, guess I should have kept reading, thanks Tony!
___
sipx-users mailing list
sipx-users@list.sip
> In any event, my firewall stopped a huge amount and at really no bandwidth
> or resource loss during the attempt at the firewall, because I implemented
> my own formulas BEFORE I posted the blog entry...
>>> I took the liberty to install/configure the Country Block Option in
>> pfSense...
Just
Any way of hiding the following error, perhaps even using a redirect?
Error 404 - Not Found.
No context on this server matched or handled this request.
Contexts known to this server are:
* WebApplicationContext[/cmcprov,sipXconfig-cmcprov]
* WebApplicationContext[/sipxconfig,sipXconfig-we
Er...
DLS model = DSL modem
Mike
___
sipx-users mailing list
sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
On Wed, 13 Oct 2010 06:12:45 -0400, Tony Graziano wrote:
> if he is using a softhphone make sure it is set for using local address,
> ice and stun truned off. make sure your sip alg and spi is off.
In this case, a simple PAP2 ATA would fulfill the requirement. Putting it
directly on his provider
Tony, let me know if you still need fax help, we can test what ever you need if
we've got what is required.
We use flowroute and voip.ms, one of them has T.38 if not both or we can go
through the mediant.
Mike
___
sipx-users mailing list
sipx-users@l
> well, there's a cost benefit equation... if you blow 6 hrs trying to make
> this work (and then it still doesn't) and a linksys wrt54g costs $70...
> Fight the good fight if you'd like.
> At some point Mr. Logical will concede to Mr. Slightly Deranged.
Got it, that's what I thought you meant :)
On Tue, 12 Oct 2010 13:57:34 -0400, Michael Picher wrote:
> rip / replace
Sorry Mike, I don't understand.
Do you mean get the netgear out of the remote end?
If so, I can't do it, the user won't replace his router and I'm trying to
figure out what that setup is doing that is preventing rings fro
Updated information.
So the problem isn't quite as I've described and I apologize for that since
it's second hand information to me and I'm trying to get it clear so I can ask
about it.
The User settings for this remote user has Call Forwarding setting set to 12
seconds so that they get around
Seem to be getting somewhere but still missing something.
Now the remote can make calls but when calls come in for them, calls go
directly to VM.
Also notice in the Active Registrations screen that the remote use doesn't have
the usual Mpls x-sipX-privcontact=x.x.x.x but instead, is x-sipX-nonat
minimum of 3
> trunks for single hour of testing seems a bit wasteful to me.
>
> On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 7:17 AM, m...@grounded.net
> wrote:
>>> I'm not mike but I have tested them with patton. It works fine.
>>> I've also tested with voip.ms, but I'm not
>Hi all of you, may i know if i have mediant 1000 and i reinstall my server to
>4.3.
>This is able to send and receive fax t.38 or t.30?
I have a 2000 and it's running 5.6.
>Mike, is possible i just configure my mediant and point back to my
>extension number that i set from sipXecs server?
>now
> I'm not mike but I have tested them with patton. It works fine.
> I've also tested with voip.ms, but I'm not ready to rule on that yet because
> you need to do 20 or so pages (long faxes) to adequately test.
Tony, I saw your other post asking for fax help. We've been using an
asterisk/avantfax
We have a remote who has a netgear WNR3500 device.
In testing, things work fine using a different router so have concluded that
the router seems to be at fault.
Searching google isn't giving us anything conclusive in terms of it being
possible to use this device or not with sipx.
From what we
> And at this point I think only DID faxing via t.38 is being addressed. This
> means if your provider doesn't support t.38 you will want to get trunks from
> one that does support it (or go through a PRI gateway).
We use the mediant 2K with PRI's and route faxes to a fax server. I would love
to
I have seen a lot of mention of faxing on sipx so I decided to take a look to
see what's up.
I am unable to confirm if this is something coming in a new version or just the
usual ongoing chatter about it. Searching sipfoundry doesn't reveal much. Can
someone confirm if this is something new com
On Sat, 2 Oct 2010 06:58:11 +0200, Rene Pankratz wrote:
> Mike, this commands should do what you want:
> # Use this to clear all iptables rules and allow everything:
> # iptables --flush
Thanks, that is very appreciated.
Mike
___
sipx-users mailing lis
> You can easily set up iptables to allow only certain external addresses to
> communicate with ports 80/8443. The critical thing is to ensure that you
> don't block communications that uses transient ports, and sipXecs does so
> for SIP and RTP. Most iptables configurations block everything but
On Thu, 23 Sep 2010 14:10:18 +0100, Hiral Patel wrote:
> Is it possible to customize the end user portal so that unwanted items are
> simply removed from the web page?
> We do not want to give our end users the option to see and select the
> conference bridge and phone book tab.
Yes, you can modi
> So basically, restore between minor revisions is okay between 4.2.1s?
I've done a good number of these build and restores over the past year and
don't recall even one not going as planned so long as everything is the same,
IP, name, and when you use sipx-setup I believe it is.
I should have c
> 1. Install identical version of sipxecs.
I've also done it after updating sipx on the new box.
Really seems to depend on how many changes were made between versions.
Mike
___
sipx-users mailing list
sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List Archive: http:/
> Can I safely restore this backup to the most current build of Sipx? If
> not, what are the proper steps to downgrade to a specific build of Sipx to
> safely restore this backup?
I've done this several times, first checking with the list for any possible
things that might be known issues at th
> If you have sipxecs behind a firewall you could certainly limit it there.
It's behind a firewall, lan side users need access to their controls.
In my application, I just want to use iptables to allow SIP/RTP and other
services as usual but limit 80/8443 to specific clients.
_
> I think all we would need is a correctly configured iptables firewall. See
> here: http://track.sipfoundry.org/browse/XX-5197
> You can certainly do this manually.
Thanks. Wasn't sure if there might be some issues. Typically, on phone systems,
iptables aren't used but I want to allow all traff
I've noticed that iptables on sipx is always disabled when I install a server.
I was wondering if there are any problems with using iptables? I have a
requirement where I wish only certain clients to have access to port 80/8443
and want to use iptables to allow/deny access to these ports.
Thank
>>> IF IT WERE ME, and it's not, I would simply load a 64bit OS on 64bit
>>> hardware if I was going to use more than 4GB RAM.
I did as you suggested. I installed a system using the 64bit ISO, then restored
a 32bit to that and everything seems to have gone fine.
It's been several days now, no is
Does sipx support any type of "pre-authentication" method or the passing of
security credentials, such as SSO.
___
sipx-users mailing list
sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
Just installed sipXconfig (4.2.1-018971.dhubler 2010-08-21T04:59:23 build37)
and noticed a small issue.
There is no refresh amount in the Active Registrations page. It shows "Refresh
everyseconds" with no seconds, not even hidden or invisible.
Mike
_
On Wed, 8 Sep 2010 12:56:01 -0400, Tony Graziano wrote:
> Everything should be the same: ip, sipdomain, hostname.
That's what I thought but hoped there might be another way.
Thanks, that's what I'll do then.
Mike
___
sipx-users mailing list
sipx-users
I am about to build a 64bit replacement for a 32bit system.
I've received input from the list saying that it should not be a problem doing
this.
However, what about the ssl cert, do I need to keep the same name that is on
the current system in order for everything to go smoothly and if not, wil
t; --Original Message------
> From: m...@grounded.net
> Sender: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
> To: sipx-users
> ReplyTo: m...@grounded.net
> Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Anyone using mondoarchive?
> Sent: Aug 29, 2010 9:38 AM
>
>> No, this is a known issue with
Any known issues in making a backup of a 32bit system then restoring it onto a
fresh 64bit iso install?
___
sipx-users mailing list
sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
> You could use sfdisk to dump the partition table to a file, and then
> just rsync the / file system to the nfs store excluding /dev/, /proc,
I wasn't aware of this method and will have to look more into it.
> Also you probably need to dump
> the database occasionally and make sure it's consiste
> I think it depends on your requirements. Are you backing up disk to
> disk? Disk to Tape? To a remote server in the same network or in a
> different network. Are you trying to get a bare metal restore, or
> just config files and databases?
Local nfs disk shares, bare metal restore to identic
BTW, do you suggest anything else for live backups?
Looking for something easy to use like mondo :).
Had been using clonezilla server for some time but doesn't suit purposes
anymore.
___
sipx-users mailing list
sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List Archi
> No, this is a known issue with that package. You're better off on
> there site to understand, get fixed.
Will do. Thought I'd ask in case it was something with sipx since it works on
one system.
> IF IT WERE ME, and it's not, I would simply load a 64bit OS on 64bit
> hardware if I was going t
As a test, I tried using mondoarchive on a system I keep fully updated. The
process went along just fine.
The server is running 2.6.18-194.11.1.el5 #1 SMP.
But then, I tried using it on two systems which are not fully updated.
One system is identical hardware to the above and is running 2.6.18-1
My systems are currently running 4.2.1-018932 2010-06-25T10:43:40 build33
perfectly well.
I've seen posts of folks having problems updating so wanted to ask if there is
anything I might have missed before I update using yum.
Mike
___
sipx-users mail
Thanks Tony. I'll look into that instead.
On Fri, 27 Aug 2010 17:31:32 -0400, Tony Graziano wrote:
> Not that I'm aware of. The webserver is tomcat running on top a apache. Its
>
> really a tomcat question I think.
>
> Tony Graziano, Manager
> Telephone: 434.984.8430
Does the sipx server have any means by which it could accept an environment
variable, say from an external apache server, to auto log the user into their
control panel?
___
sipx-users mailing list
sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List Archive: http://lis
Welcome Joegen.
Thanks to Mike Picher, I learned a little about OpenSBC.
Had problems which couldn't be resolved (I believe it was the Vyatta portion)
but very much hoping to use it again at some point.
On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 10:05:36 -0400, Martin Steinmann wrote:
> Please welcome Joegen Baclor
Faxing IN sipx is a total wish because it would eliminate our having to
maintain separate systems.
I would love to see this. Plus, this way, when I hire someone to do the
integration work I need done, accounts will be in one place.
Mike
___
sipx-user
> I'm not opposed to the forum, I just don't want the mailing list to go
> away.
Paul, don't get me wrong, I totally agree with you on this point. I dislike how
much email I get from the mailing list and how difficult it is for ME to
maintain notes on issues gone past but there is a better conne
BTW, there is one very important aspect about a mailing list that isn't such a
given in forums.
There is a connection between members which seems to happen now and then which
I don't see as often in forums.
Maybe that's part of what the old school feeling is with lists.
Anyhow, I'm outta here
> I don't see how if your searching a Forum locally or searching the
> just the specific site that contained mailing list or forum from
> google where you are not going to get fairly close results. You're
> still searching the same exact content. Most of the time within
> forums you have to turn
>�On 8/13/2010 1:18 PM, Paul Herron wrote: >� �Scalix message content � �
>�While I agree with everything Josh has written below, I’m loathe to let
>�go of the mailing list. I fear/suspect that shifting to a “forum only”
>�will lead to a decline in participation and or attrition.
Seems the reason
> Or just searching: dns site:sipfoundry.org to get mailing list, wiki, jira
> etc?
Talk about adding complexity for most people though :)
___
sipx-users mailing list
sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-
> Out of curiosity how is entering the following into google not
> searchable enough?
Because it's google, which indexes everything so your results are everything.
Much more useful to have powerful search tools in a good forum choice and bring
up local results only.
_
Right now, I'm confused as to what's been going on with sipx or it's various
flavors and sites and wiki's. I've not been very active because things are
running well at the moment but I do stay on the list and look at everything
that flows. I wish however that there was ONE main forum somewhere w
Anyone have the latest firmware for this? Seems a shame to have them sitting
here doing nothing.
They don't have DNS SRV capabilities so haven't used them. Hoping perhaps newer
software might give them this capability.
On Sun, 27 Jun 2010 13:41:32 -0500, m...@grounded.net wrote:
&
> that merge-logs was not producing useful output, which seems to have been
> due to user error (in particular, not getting logging set to INFO level).
> So there's no reason to carry on worrying about the situation.
It was actually because I was looking for the wrong number but still user error
> Given that status information is stored in the VM "database", I would
> expect that a filesystem replication strategy would work 98% of the time,
> and the other 2% would destroy information. I wouldn't trust anything less
> than a real distributed DBMS to work robustly.
Thing is, when the stan
There's only one way to find out what might work, I'm going to build a couple
of systems and see what I can come up with.
Sometimes, solutions are found by not over complicating the thinking first,
trying it, then working through the problems.
What would happen if you had two sipx systems, shar
I have been wondering about a combination of what you guys are doing.
Rather than keeping two servers in sync, my thought is running two base
servers, where each has it's sipx related directories on a very fast network
share. The database server would be hosted on another server and a client use
I very badly need to make sure that a server is always present, that VM is
always available. Even if it means dropped calls when failing over to another
server, that would be acceptable.
I've asked about fail over in the past and wondering if anyone has worked on
such a beast to date?
HA to me
Finally found it.
I've been looking for ntpd all along because I had removed my ntpdate script
which was using ntpdate.
I had a second script sitting in /etc/cron.hourly and never looked there. Since
I wasn't looking for ntpdate, nothing ever came up.
I was using grep for example, searching sp
> (One thing to check: is ntpd.conf's modification date reasonable?
Looks right. That's about the time I last changed anything on it.
# ls -la /etc/ntp.conf
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 784 Jul 13 17:36 /etc/ntp.conf
# more /etc/ntp.conf
tinker panic 0
restrict default kod nomodify notrap nopeer noque
starting?
> -Original Message-
> From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
> [mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of
> m...@grounded.net
> Sent: Friday, July 16, 2010 9:28 AM
> To: sipx-users
> Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Random Dropped Registrations
>
> E
Early in this thread, I was reminded that I should not run ntpdate when ntpd is
running. I had a cron job running every hour, which would stop ntpd, run
ntpdate, then restart ntpd. That of course was removed. Now, as it should, ntpd
is started when the system boots and should maintain the clock,
> "What's in a name? That which we call a rose
> By any other name would smell as sweet."
I vote for SipX (is sipxecs already formally sipx?), since, everyone already
calls it that :).
I'm just an end user, with intentions/hopes of being able to contribute to
features in the future, but for now
> Avaya has expressed a desire to control the messaging of their project and
> to control the roadmap, hence the fork from avaya to build upon sipxecs via
> the openscs community they are unveiling.
Does the plan include the open source version having less features than the
commercial version?
T
.sipfoundry.org
> [mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of
> m...@grounded.net
> Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2010 9:34 PM
> To: sipx-users
> Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Diagnostics Tools in sipxecs 4.2 :: What could
> realistically be added after 4.2?
>
> If Mike i
> That's fine, but I instructed you to *note down the extension of an
> affected phone*, and you did not do that. The importance of that step may
> not be obvious, but I've learned the hard way that when trying to fix a
I fully agree, and I need to be more detailed when I have problems with sipx.
sage-
> From: Todd Hodgen [mailto:thod...@verizon.net]
> Sent: Saturday, July 03, 2010 2:02 PM
> To: 'Martin Steinmann'
> Cc: m...@grounded.net
> Subject: FW: [sipx-users] Diagnostics Tools in sipxecs 4.2 :: What could
> realistically be added after 4.2?
>
> Marti
501 - 600 of 1046 matches
Mail list logo
