On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 11:11 PM, Joe Micciche wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 03/09/2012 02:37 PM, Tony Graziano wrote:
>> i am not concerned with the endpoint since sipfoundry does not
>> produce an endpoint. i had this discussion with mp3licensing.com
>> already.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/09/2012 02:37 PM, Tony Graziano wrote:
> i am not concerned with the endpoint since sipfoundry does not
> produce an endpoint. i had this discussion with mp3licensing.com
> already. sipx does not produce an endpoint, mp3 licensing does not
> appl
Don't worry, I can safely say MP3 would *never* be the only option,
license issues or not.
___
sipx-users mailing list
sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
i am not concerned with the endpoint since sipfoundry does not produce an
endpoint. i had this discussion with mp3licensing.com already. sipx does
not produce an endpoint, mp3 licensing does not apply to sipfoundry,
period. please refer to the tracker for the mp3 request and all the
relevant detail
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/09/2012 01:55 PM, Tony Graziano wrote:
> if you are referring to pulling in packages that violate licenses
> do you mean mp3? i reviewed mp3 with the foundation and since we
> are not mastering or distributing this as content, sipx will
> require
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 1:43 PM, Joe Micciche wrote:
> 1 - configurable, for example I have the option to (dis)allow mp3;
yes
> 2 - extended to enable other formats, e.g. ogg
Much of the work dealt with freeswitch config, so I'm sure this will
be possible.
_
if you are referring to pulling in packages that violate licenses do you
mean mp3? i reviewed mp3 with the foundation and since we are not mastering
or distributing this as content, sipx will require no licensing.
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 1:43 PM, Joe Micciche wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAG
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/09/2012 05:28 AM, sipx-users-requ...@list.sipfoundry.org wrote:
> Douglas - can you clarify - did MP3 voicemail encoding make the
> cut?! If not, I demand a re-vote - or a revolt...I'm fine with
> either option.
>
> Especially for openUC HA med
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Organization: SipXecs Forum
In-Reply-To:
X-FUDforum: 08063afcdd00a6e76393c5b9527381e8 <66425>
Message-ID: <10379.4f586...@forum.sipfoundry.org>
+1 on this. IIRC, this was one of the things we discussed
at the airport
Douglas - can you clarify - did MP3 voicemail encoding make the cut?! If not,
I demand a re-vote - or a revolt...I'm fine with either option.
Especially for openUC HA media services - replicating mp3 vs. wav seems to make
a lot of sense.
-Original Message-
Night Losers
*
are
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] CoLab
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 1:15 AM, Todd Hodgen wrote:
> Douglas - will there be any published results for Hackfest?
A lot of the guys are visiting US for a while, but I can give you some info
i gathered. This is all work that will go into 4.6
Da Gangstas!
==
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 1:15 AM, Todd Hodgen wrote:
> Douglas – will there be any published results for Hackfest?
A lot of the guys are visiting US for a while, but I can give you some
info i gathered. This is all work that will go into 4.6
Da Gangstas!
* We've worked thru the homer
Mike, you had a typo…… Weren’t you thinking 15.2?
From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
[mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Michael Picher
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2012 4:31 AM
To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] CoLab
:* Thursday, March 08, 2012 4:31 AM
>
> *To:* Discussion list for users of sipXecs software
> *Subject:* Re: [sipx-users] CoLab
>
> ** **
>
> In my spare time I'll write it just for you Nathaniel ;-)
>
> It'll be ready in time for sipXecs 5.2...
>
>
ubject: Re: [sipx-users] CoLab
Douglas - will there be any published results for Hackfest?
From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
[mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Douglas Hubler
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2012 9:53 PM
To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs softwa
I am very sorry that I missed the event. You know, as fate would have it I was
migrating 75 users to a new sipXecs install. Went well however I would have
liked to attend the event.
Robert Schroeder
IT Manager
Information Systems
Member First Mortgage: NMLS ID# 149532
616 44th St SE
Grand
gt; To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software
> Subject: Re: [sipx-users] CoLab
>
> +1
>
> I’m looking forward to doing some testing against 4.6, the development team
> definitely had their work cut out for them. Kudos to the everyone for their
> vision of where t
undry.org] On Behalf Of Todd Hodgen
> Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2012 11:37 PM
> To: 'Discussion list for users of sipXecs software'
> Subject: Re: [sipx-users] CoLab
>
> �
>
> Actually, the book is called �The Book formerly called Building Enterprise
>
foundry.org] *On Behalf Of *Aaron Pursell
> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 07, 2012 10:24 PM
> *To:* sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
> *Subject:* Re: [sipx-users] CoLab
>
> ** **
>
> I thought it was good, found it good to talk to others about their
> installations and
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Organization: SipXecs Forum
In-Reply-To:
X-FUDforum: 08063afcdd00a6e76393c5b9527381e8 <66389>
Message-ID: <10355.4f57c...@forum.sipfoundry.org>
Douglas Hubler wrote on Wed, 07 March 2012 13:00
> Was great to finally m
oundry.org
[mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Todd Hodgen
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2012 11:37 PM
To: 'Discussion list for users of sipXecs software'
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] CoLab
Actually, the book is called "The Book formerly called Building Enterpris
; *From:* sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org [mailto:
> sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] *On Behalf Of *Todd Hodgen
> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 07, 2012 11:37 PM
> *To:* 'Discussion list for users of sipXecs software'
> *Subject:* Re: [sipx-users] CoLab
>
> ** **
>
Well played
From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
[mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Todd Hodgen
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2012 11:37 PM
To: 'Discussion list for users of sipXecs software'
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] CoLab
Actually, the book is called
users of sipXecs software
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] CoLab
+1
I’m looking forward to doing some testing against 4.6, the development team
definitely had their work cut out for them. Kudos to the everyone for their
vision of where they want to take the product – it’s good to know that the
nesday, March 07, 2012 10:24 PM
To: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] CoLab
I thought it was good, found it good to talk to others about their
installations and setups. Presentations detailed a lot of new features, can't
wait to see 4.6. Nice to put some faces to names
I thought it was good, found it good to talk to others about their
installations and setups. Presentations detailed a lot of new features, can't
wait to see 4.6. Nice to put some faces to names I read all the time. Look
forward to continuing to use the product and seeing what else evolves.
Aar
pXecs software'
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] CoLab
Darn, I really regret missing CoLab, sounds like it would have been a great
event.
Okay, Kidding. It was a great event, well organized, and a great
opportunity to meet like-minded Open Source advocates. If you missed it, I
do recommend it for
icher
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2012 4:02 PM
To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software
Subject: [sipx-users] CoLab
Thanks to those who attended sipX CoLab!
Things all seemed to go very well from our perspective! Hopefully others
will pipe up and say what they thought herre.
Thank
Thanks to those who attended sipX CoLab!
Things all seemed to go very well from our perspective! Hopefully others
will pipe up and say what they thought herre.
Thanks,
Mike
--
Michael Picher, Director of Technical Services
eZuce, Inc.
300 Brickstone Square
Suite 201
Andover, MA. 0
Michael Picher
Sent: Monday, February 13, 2012 8:36 AM
To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software
Subject: [sipx-users] CoLab flights
If you haven't booked flights already for CoLab, Southwest seems to have
some really great Web only rates into Denver!
Also, there's a discount
If you haven't booked flights already for CoLab, Southwest seems to have
some really great Web only rates into Denver!
Also, there's a discounted rate at the Hilton in Fort Collins.
Fort Collins is about an hour and 20 minutes away from the Denver airport.
Car rentals are pretty reasonable... I
31 matches
Mail list logo
