On 2/9/2012 8:02 AM, Philippe Laurent wrote:
> Thanks Gerald! Working on the set up today after end-of-business
> day. I'm assuming that for IP Auth that I will have to port forward
> 5080 to 5060?
>
>
No. 5080 to 5080
--
Regards
--
Gerald Drouillard
Technol
On 2/9/2012 7:43 AM, Tony Graziano wrote:
> If your firewall is configured correctly, why would NAT be set to YES.
> Normally it would be set to NO if sipXbridge is in use and advertising
> a public IP address (behind NAT). It has always been suggested to have
> the provider DISABLE or TURN OFF NAT
Thanks Gerald! Working on the set up today after end-of-business day. I'm
assuming that for IP Auth that I will have to port forward 5080 to 5060?
Tony, your input is appreciated as well. I will review the firewall
settings to ensure that something isn't configured a bit wonky.
Philippe
On Thu,
On 2/9/2012 7:50 AM, Tony Graziano wrote:
> for those of you who experience this problem, what is your
> registration interval setting? With some ITSP's who have given me this
> headache, I found lowering my setting (sometimes 180) really reduced
> the problem (voxitas, etc.).
It didn't change the
for those of you who experience this problem, what is your
registration interval setting? With some ITSP's who have given me this
headache, I found lowering my setting (sometimes 180) really reduced
the problem (voxitas, etc.).
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 7:43 AM, Tony Graziano
wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 9,
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 7:13 AM, Gerald Drouillard
wrote:
> On 2/8/2012 10:48 PM, Philippe Laurent wrote:
>
> Gerald -
>
> After repeated hours and iterations, and I'm at the point where I know I'm
> missing something.
>
> I'll swallow my pride and say that I don't quite get how to do what you've
>
On 2/8/2012 10:48 PM, Philippe Laurent wrote:
Gerald -
After repeated hours and iterations, and I'm at the point where I know
I'm missing something.
I'll swallow my pride and say that I don't quite get how to do what
you've proposed (IP Auth with Voip.ms + SIP URI + what you've done on
the
Gerald -
After repeated hours and iterations, and I'm at the point where I know I'm
missing something.
I'll swallow my pride and say that I don't quite get how to do what you've
proposed (IP Auth with Voip.ms + SIP URI + what you've done on the firewall
to make it happen). I looked back at the li
On 2/7/2012 2:12 AM, Tony Graziano wrote:
> realize you cannot do call transfers with the above mentioned method,
> so your mileage may vary.
Yes you can! You have the have the DID configured to come in on 5080.
Example voip.ms SIP URI:
{DID}@pbx1.example.com:5080
or
{DID}@youripaddress:5080
>
realize you cannot do call transfers with the above mentioned method,
so your mileage may vary.
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 9:31 PM, Gerald Drouillard
wrote:
> On 2/6/2012 3:10 PM, Nathaniel Watkins wrote:
>> Has anyone else seen the below behavor? I seem to get this about once a day
>> - one minu
On 2/6/2012 3:10 PM, Nathaniel Watkins wrote:
> Has anyone else seen the below behavor? I seem to get this about once a day
> - one minute later I get a message that the ITSP account has recovered.
>
> I was quick on the draw today - so as soon as the first email came in - I
> dialed my cell pho
gt; > From: "Michael Picher"
> > To: "Discussion list for users of sipXecs software"
> >
> > Sent: Monday, February 6, 2012 10:16:26 PM
> > Subject: Re: [sipx-users] FW: Alarm SPX00016: The ITSP Account
> > could not
> > be reached
> &g
; primary service.
>>
>> -Original Message-----
>> From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
>> [mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Nathaniel
>> Watkins
>> Sent: Monday, February 06, 2012 12:11 PM
>> To: Discussion list for us
l Picher"
> To: "Discussion list for users of sipXecs software"
>
> Sent: Monday, February 6, 2012 10:16:26 PM
> Subject: Re: [sipx-users] FW: Alarm SPX00016: The ITSP Account could
> not be reached
> Ditto here guys... I tried tracking this down with them and
consider a reliable career for
> primary service.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
> [mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Nathaniel
> Watkins
> Sent: Monday, February 06, 2012 12:11 PM
> To: Discussion list for
ssage-
From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
[mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Nathaniel
Watkins
Sent: Monday, February 06, 2012 12:11 PM
To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software
Subject: [sipx-users] FW: Alarm SPX00016: The ITSP Account could not be
reac
I get the same error once or twice a day at one location, but strangely not
at any other locations. All connect to the newyork.voip.ms instance, all
have the same firewall and rules in place.
I have yet to determine a cause (and clearly a solution).
Philippe
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 3:10 PM, Natha
Has anyone else seen the below behavor? I seem to get this about once a day -
one minute later I get a message that the ITSP account has recovered.
I was quick on the draw today - so as soon as the first email came in - I
dialed my cell phone as a long distance call - sure enough, it was routed
18 matches
Mail list logo
