Re: [sipx-users] Problem with internal calls Polycom to Polycom - PRACK missing

2011-06-22 Thread George Niculae
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 4:31 PM, Joegen Baclor wrote: > Hi Tony, > > The cause of the 488 is now known.   It is the fact that when SRTP is > enabled, Polycom offer two m-lines.  One for the enrypted stream, and > the other the normal none-encrypted stream.  Both are offered using the > same port.

Re: [sipx-users] Problem with internal calls Polycom to Polycom - PRACK missing

2011-06-22 Thread Joegen Baclor
Hi Tony, The cause of the 488 is now known. It is the fact that when SRTP is enabled, Polycom offer two m-lines. One for the enrypted stream, and the other the normal none-encrypted stream. Both are offered using the same port. The normal answer from a compliant provider is to offer a por

Re: [sipx-users] Problem with internal calls Polycom to Polycom - PRACK missing

2011-06-22 Thread George Niculae
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 3:05 PM, Tony Graziano wrote: > I saw srtp in the siptrace, but not in the pcap (generated from > firewall), so it never made it to the itsp. I also removed it from the > phone and then had 2 way audio. > > If you look at both siptraces, they are markedly different. > > In

Re: [sipx-users] Problem with internal calls Polycom to Polycom - PRACK missing

2011-06-22 Thread Tony Graziano
I saw srtp in the siptrace, but not in the pcap (generated from firewall), so it never made it to the itsp. I also removed it from the phone and then had 2 way audio. If you look at both siptraces, they are markedly different. In looking at the polcyom settings in sipxconfig it defaults to: Enab

Re: [sipx-users] Problem with internal calls Polycom to Polycom - PRACK missing

2011-06-22 Thread Joegen Baclor
Tony, there are zero changes required for SRTP. All changes made was just in the polycom template. But i am not sure if that has some effect in audio for Polycom. If you suspect its the polycom config, George can probably give you the old template and try. George? On 06/22/2011 07:47 PM, T

Re: [sipx-users] Problem with internal calls Polycom to Polycom - PRACK missing

2011-06-22 Thread George Niculae
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 2:47 PM, Tony Graziano wrote: > I removed that from the bridge, no luck. Works with G722 in some pops, > not all. I also removed that from the phone. IF you look at the > siptrace examples, there is no "moved temporarily" on the failed call. > > Also, with polycom remote us

Re: [sipx-users] Problem with internal calls Polycom to Polycom - PRACK missing

2011-06-22 Thread Tony Graziano
I removed that from the bridge, no luck. Works with G722 in some pops, not all. I also removed that from the phone. IF you look at the siptrace examples, there is no "moved temporarily" on the failed call. Also, with polycom remote users, I now have one way audio on successful calls (remote users

Re: [sipx-users] Problem with internal calls Polycom to Polycom - PRACK missing

2011-06-22 Thread Joegen Baclor
Hi Tony, Definitely coincidental. The call ended due to a codec issue. Probably G.722? Joegen On 06/22/2011 06:07 PM, Tony Graziano wrote: > I posted pcaps and siptraces of a failed/successful transaction in > outbound calls. Hopefully this will shed some light on whether this is > related

Re: [sipx-users] Problem with internal calls Polycom to Polycom - PRACK missing

2011-06-22 Thread Tony Graziano
oops. posted on wrong updated email. sorry. On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 6:25 AM, Joegen Baclor wrote: > Did you just mixed up the email threads or the comment below is related to > the pcaps? > > On 06/22/2011 06:19 PM, Tony Graziano wrote: >> >> This makes me think if we have a really funky requirem

Re: [sipx-users] Problem with internal calls Polycom to Polycom - PRACK missing

2011-06-22 Thread Joegen Baclor
Did you just mixed up the email threads or the comment below is related to the pcaps? On 06/22/2011 06:19 PM, Tony Graziano wrote: > This makes me think if we have a really funky requirement for support > moh (lots of old clunky cisco phones, for example)... > > phone group>line>registration > >

Re: [sipx-users] Problem with internal calls Polycom to Polycom - PRACK missing

2011-06-22 Thread Tony Graziano
This makes me think if we have a really funky requirement for support moh (lots of old clunky cisco phones, for example)... phone group>line>registration where we can have a moh uri that essentially uses or allows 0.0.0.0, which would possibly be a way to support phones that are crappy. I'm not s

Re: [sipx-users] Problem with internal calls Polycom to Polycom - PRACK missing

2011-06-22 Thread Tony Graziano
I posted pcaps and siptraces of a failed/successful transaction in outbound calls. Hopefully this will shed some light on whether this is related to the patch or not. On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 5:49 AM, Tony Graziano wrote: > strangely I noticed I cannot place outbound calls with one provider > star

Re: [sipx-users] Problem with internal calls Polycom to Polycom - PRACK missing

2011-06-22 Thread Tony Graziano
strangely I noticed I cannot place outbound calls with one provider starting yesterday. This coincided with when i applied the patch (#6) from the build repo onto the production system. At the same time I can place calls with this provider through a different POP for them. I have sent them pcaps of

Re: [sipx-users] Problem with internal calls Polycom to Polycom - PRACK missing

2011-06-22 Thread Tony Graziano
I'd like to hear back from Dragan and Josh who were experiencing the problems or had a system that was, but if we don;t hear back from them by the end of the day I'll close it. On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 12:02 AM, Joegen Baclor wrote: > Shall we mark the task as resolved so you can close it? > > On

Re: [sipx-users] Problem with internal calls Polycom to Polycom - PRACK missing

2011-06-21 Thread Joegen Baclor
Shall we mark the task as resolved so you can close it? On 06/22/2011 02:37 AM, Tony Graziano wrote: so far that seems to have fixed it. On Jun 21, 2011 10:03 AM, "Douglas Hubler" > wrote: > On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 8:49 AM, Douglas Hubler > w

Re: [sipx-users] Problem with internal calls Polycom to Polycom - PRACK missing

2011-06-21 Thread Tony Graziano
so far that seems to have fixed it. On Jun 21, 2011 10:03 AM, "Douglas Hubler" wrote: > On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 8:49 AM, Douglas Hubler wrote: >> On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 8:19 AM, George Niculae wrote: >>> There is a fix committed by Joegen and Douglas triggered RPMs build, >>> we'd really apprec

Re: [sipx-users] Problem with internal calls Polycom to Polycom - PRACK missing

2011-06-21 Thread Douglas Hubler
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 8:49 AM, Douglas Hubler wrote: > On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 8:19 AM, George Niculae wrote: >> There is a fix committed by Joegen and Douglas triggered RPMs build, >> we'd really appreciate if you could update and give it a try later >> today when available > > I will post lin

Re: [sipx-users] Problem with internal calls Polycom to Polycom-PRACK missing

2011-06-21 Thread Matthew Kitchin (usenet/public)
Got it. He said he would post a link, and I wasn't sure if that meant the build already existed or not. -Original Message- From: Michael Picher Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 09:02:49 To: ; Discussion list for users of sipXecs software Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Problem with internal

Re: [sipx-users] Problem with internal calls Polycom to Polycom -PRACK missing

2011-06-21 Thread Michael Picher
bler > Sender: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org > Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 08:49:17 > To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software< > sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org> > Reply-To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software > > Subject: Re: [sipx-users]

Re: [sipx-users] Problem with internal calls Polycom to Polycom -PRACK missing

2011-06-21 Thread Matthew Kitchin (usenet/public)
software Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Problem with internal calls Polycom to Polycom - PRACK missing On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 8:19 AM, George Niculae wrote: > There is a fix committed by Joegen and Douglas triggered RPMs build, > we'd really appreciate if you could update and gi

Re: [sipx-users] Problem with internal calls Polycom to Polycom - PRACK missing

2011-06-21 Thread Douglas Hubler
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 8:19 AM, George Niculae wrote: > There is a fix committed by Joegen and Douglas triggered RPMs build, > we'd really appreciate if you could update and give it a try later > today when available I will post link to build when available Summary of issue http://track.sipfo

Re: [sipx-users] Problem with internal calls Polycom to Polycom - PRACK missing

2011-06-21 Thread George Niculae
On Tuesday, June 21, 2011, Dragan Jurkovic wrote: > Hi George, > >  The earliest package I noticed problem with was 4.4.0-192.ga8beb. > > There is a fix committed by Joegen and Douglas triggered RPMs build, we'd really appreciate if you could update and give it a try later today when available

Re: [sipx-users] Problem with internal calls Polycom to Polycom - PRACK missing

2011-06-21 Thread Dragan Jurkovic
Hi George, The earliest package I noticed problem with was 4.4.0-192.ga8beb. On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 6:18 PM, George Niculae wrote: > On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 12:40 AM, Tony Graziano > wrote: >> what was the patch level they were at when you left? > > Not 100% sure, but it could be due to the

Re: [sipx-users] Problem with internal calls Polycom to Polycom - PRACK missing

2011-06-20 Thread George Niculae
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 12:40 AM, Tony Graziano wrote: > what was the patch level they were at when you left? Not 100% sure, but it could be due to the RLS fix introduced with 0a9ffa2c226d72a5b7e82341bb579e2d83933a44 in sipXecs 4.4.0 update #3 - still investigating George > > On Jun 20, 2011 5:

Re: [sipx-users] Problem with internal calls Polycom to Polycom - PRACK missing

2011-06-20 Thread Tony Graziano
what was the patch level they were at when you left? On Jun 20, 2011 5:26 PM, "Josh Patten" wrote: > I hate to be a "me too" but my former employer has informed me that this is > happening to them as well, and it seemed to start happening right after I > left on june 10th (go figure, ehh?) > > On

Re: [sipx-users] Problem with internal calls Polycom to Polycom - PRACK missing

2011-06-20 Thread Josh Patten
I hate to be a "me too" but my former employer has informed me that this is happening to them as well, and it seemed to start happening right after I left on june 10th (go figure, ehh?) On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 10:37 AM, George Niculae wrote: > On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 5:40 PM, Tony Graziano > wr

Re: [sipx-users] Problem with internal calls Polycom to Polycom - PRACK missing

2011-06-20 Thread George Niculae
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 5:40 PM, Tony Graziano wrote: > proxy, bridge and relay were at debug. > Thanks Tony, we're looking at George ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users

Re: [sipx-users] Problem with internal calls Polycom to Polycom - PRACK missing

2011-06-20 Thread Tony Graziano
proxy, bridge and relay were at debug. On Jun 20, 2011 10:11 AM, "Joegen Baclor" wrote: > Its critical that we see sip message exchange. a snapshot in debug > priority would be really helpful. > > On 06/20/2011 10:00 PM, Tony Graziano wrote: >> I think the issue needs to be marked "critical" and a

Re: [sipx-users] Problem with internal calls Polycom to Polycom - PRACK missing

2011-06-20 Thread Joegen Baclor
Its critical that we see sip message exchange. a snapshot in debug priority would be really helpful. On 06/20/2011 10:00 PM, Tony Graziano wrote: > I think the issue needs to be marked "critical" and assigned to > someone. I will wipe the system in 2 hours, so if there is any > additional inform

Re: [sipx-users] Problem with internal calls Polycom to Polycom - PRACK missing

2011-06-20 Thread Tony Graziano
I think the issue needs to be marked "critical" and assigned to someone. I will wipe the system in 2 hours, so if there is any additional information needed, please let me know before then. On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 9:17 AM, George Niculae wrote: > On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 4:16 PM, Dragan Jurkovic

Re: [sipx-users] Problem with internal calls Polycom to Polycom - PRACK missing

2011-06-20 Thread Tony Graziano
I created http://track.sipfoundry.org/browse/XX-9699 Adding your own findings to this issue will help i think. On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 9:16 AM, Dragan Jurkovic wrote: > Save yourself an effort Tony. I tried ALL available (downloadable) > versions. It always happens with 4.4. I tested 331s and 6

Re: [sipx-users] Problem with internal calls Polycom to Polycom - PRACK missing

2011-06-20 Thread Tony Graziano
http://track.sipfoundry.org/browse/XX-9699 On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 9:17 AM, George Niculae wrote: > On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 4:16 PM, Dragan Jurkovic wrote: >> Save yourself an effort Tony. I tried ALL available (downloadable) >> versions. It always happens with 4.4. I tested 331s and 650s. >>

Re: [sipx-users] Problem with internal calls Polycom to Polycom - PRACK missing

2011-06-20 Thread George Niculae
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 4:16 PM, Dragan Jurkovic wrote: > Save yourself an effort Tony. I tried ALL available (downloadable) > versions. It always happens with 4.4. I tested 331s and 650s. > Can you share a snapshot? It won't solve by itself ... :) George

Re: [sipx-users] Problem with internal calls Polycom to Polycom - PRACK missing

2011-06-20 Thread Dragan Jurkovic
Save yourself an effort Tony. I tried ALL available (downloadable) versions. It always happens with 4.4. I tested 331s and 650s. Dragan On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 9:12 AM, Tony Graziano wrote: > I plan to. I have to wait for the site to be staffed. I have also downgraded > forward to 3.1.3 so I can

Re: [sipx-users] Problem with internal calls Polycom to Polycom - PRACK missing

2011-06-20 Thread Tony Graziano
I plan to. I have to wait for the site to be staffed. I have also downgraded forward to 3.1.3 so I can test further. if it happens only on 3.2.x then I had an upgrade a phone and selectively test without disrupting a working sytem. otherwise I have to snapshot/calltrace then wipe and load ip 4.2.1.

Re: [sipx-users] Problem with internal calls Polycom to Polycom -PRACK missing

2011-06-20 Thread Paul Curtis
; To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software > Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Problem with internal calls Polycom to Polycom > -PRACK missing > > This is a known issue with Polycom, I worked with them to resolve the > missing PRACK. This also had to do with the on-hold issue I

Re: [sipx-users] Problem with internal calls Polycom to Polycom - PRACK missing

2011-06-20 Thread Douglas Hubler
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 8:07 AM, George Niculae wrote: > Tony, could you take snapshot and raise a critical in JIRA? Yes, please. Even if it's related to a polycom bug Paul Curtis points out, if it doesn't happen in sipxecs 4.2.1, then we should at a minimum learn what the issue is and possibly

Re: [sipx-users] Problem with internal calls Polycom to Polycom - PRACK missing

2011-06-20 Thread George Niculae
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 2:20 PM, Tony Graziano wrote: > On Monday, June 20, 2011, Douglas Hubler wrote: >> On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 11:44 PM, Paul Curtis wrote: >>> This is a known issue with Polycom, I worked with them to resolve the >>> missing PRACK.  This also had to do with the on-hold issue

Re: [sipx-users] Problem with internal calls Polycom to Polycom - PRACK missing

2011-06-20 Thread Tony Graziano
On Monday, June 20, 2011, Douglas Hubler wrote: > On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 11:44 PM, Paul Curtis wrote: >> This is a known issue with Polycom, I worked with them to resolve the >> missing PRACK.  This also had to do with the on-hold issue I had posted a >> while back.  That was when Polycom notice

Re: [sipx-users] Problem with internal calls Polycom to Polycom -PRACK missing

2011-06-20 Thread Douglas Hubler
On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 11:44 PM, Paul Curtis wrote: > This is a known issue with Polycom, I worked with them to resolve the > missing PRACK.  This also had to do with the on-hold issue I had posted a > while back.  That was when Polycom noticed the missing PRACK.  They do > have a software releas

Re: [sipx-users] Problem with internal calls Polycom to Polycom -PRACK missing

2011-06-19 Thread Todd Hodgen
sipXecs software Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Problem with internal calls Polycom to Polycom -PRACK missing This is a known issue with Polycom, I worked with them to resolve the missing PRACK. This also had to do with the on-hold issue I had posted a while back. That was when Polycom noticed the

Re: [sipx-users] Problem with internal calls Polycom to Polycom -PRACK missing

2011-06-19 Thread Paul Curtis
4.2.1. > >> You may have provided this in the past, but it¹s a long thread - I >>haven't >> gone through and digested all of it. >> > >Thank you for fast answer > >Dragan >> >> -Original Message- >> From: sipx-users-boun...@list.si

Re: [sipx-users] Problem with internal calls Polycom to Polycom -PRACK missing

2011-06-19 Thread Dragan Jurkovic
nt: Sunday, June 19, 2011 1:00 PM > To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software > Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Problem with internal calls Polycom to Polycom > -PRACK missing > > Did some more experimenting: > > - Since we have working installation on remote site which is only

Re: [sipx-users] Problem with internal calls Polycom to Polycom -PRACK missing

2011-06-19 Thread Tony Graziano
ssage- >>> From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org >>> [mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Todd Hodgen >>> Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2011 4:05 PM >>> To: 'Discussion list for users of sipXecs software'; >>> mkit

Re: [sipx-users] Problem with internal calls Polycom to Polycom -PRACK missing

2011-06-19 Thread Todd Hodgen
: Re: [sipx-users] Problem with internal calls Polycom to Polycom -PRACK missing Did some more experimenting: - Since we have working installation on remote site which is only couple of patches behind I re installed 4.4, did not apply any "yum update", and finally I restored config

Re: [sipx-users] Problem with internal calls Polycom to Polycom -PRACK missing

2011-06-19 Thread Todd Hodgen
users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Dragan Jurkovic Sent: Sunday, June 19, 2011 1:00 PM To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Problem with internal calls Polycom to Polycom -PRACK missing Did some more experimenting: - Since we have working installation on r

Re: [sipx-users] Problem with internal calls Polycom to Polycom -PRACK missing

2011-06-19 Thread Dragan Jurkovic
...@list.sipfoundry.org >> [mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Dragan Jurkovic >> Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2011 1:00 PM >> To: mkitchin.pub...@gmail.com; Discussion list for users of sipXecs software >> Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Problem with internal

Re: [sipx-users] Problem with internal calls Polycom to Polycom -PRACK missing

2011-06-17 Thread Dragan Jurkovic
...@list.sipfoundry.org > [mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Todd Hodgen > Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2011 4:05 PM > To: 'Discussion list for users of sipXecs software'; mkitchin.pub...@gmail.com > Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Problem with internal calls Polyc

Re: [sipx-users] Problem with internal calls Polycom to Polycom -PRACK missing

2011-06-16 Thread Nathaniel Watkins
Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2011 4:05 PM To: 'Discussion list for users of sipXecs software'; mkitchin.pub...@gmail.com Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Problem with internal calls Polycom to Polycom -PRACK missing There are several on this list, including myself, that have been burned by Netgear

Re: [sipx-users] Problem with internal calls Polycom to Polycom -PRACK missing

2011-06-16 Thread Todd Hodgen
t; From: Tony Graziano > Sender: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org > Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 12:29:05 > To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software > Reply-To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software >         > Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Problem with internal cal

Re: [sipx-users] Problem with internal calls Polycom to Polycom-PRACK missing

2011-06-16 Thread Matthew Kitchin (usenet/public)
ge- > From: Tony Graziano > Sender: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org > Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 12:29:05 > To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs > software > Reply-To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software >         > Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Problem with

Re: [sipx-users] Problem with internal calls Polycom to Polycom -PRACK missing

2011-06-16 Thread Dragan Jurkovic
nder: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org > Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 12:29:05 > To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs > software > Reply-To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software >         > Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Problem with internal calls Polycom to Polycom - >  PRACK mi

Re: [sipx-users] Problem with internal calls Polycom to Polycom -PRACK missing

2011-06-16 Thread Matthew Kitchin (usenet/public)
-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 12:29:05 To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software Reply-To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Problem with internal calls Polycom to Polycom - PRACK missing On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 12:20 PM

Re: [sipx-users] Problem with internal calls Polycom to Polycom - PRACK missing

2011-06-16 Thread Tony Graziano
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 12:20 PM, Dragan Jurkovic wrote: > Hi all, > >  I have a strange problem with internal calls between Polycom phones > (IP 331 boot rom 4.1.3, SIP 3.2.4.B). sipXecs is 4.4 with all latest > patches applied. > When calling from one station to another an attempt to answer inco