Re: [sipx-users] single extension for multiple park orbits

2012-11-26 Thread Michael Picher
Guess I have to go back to 'park how sipXecs parks' for now... >From an eZuce perspective we probably won't have this on our plate for a bit. But, as I said, if somebody would like to contribute a solution that implements parking in freeswitch, that can have the orbits monitored and have at a min

Re: [sipx-users] single extension for multiple park orbits

2012-11-26 Thread Ali Ardestani
one another thing I found is that this schema completely works if we treat call park extensions as Polycom "normal" BLA not "automata" however this will result in calls not being pickup with the line key after 60 seconds as polycom tries to dial the orbit directly instead of sending the *78+orbit a

Re: [sipx-users] single extension for multiple park orbits

2012-11-26 Thread Ali Ardestani
The orbit number is know to users because of the blinking BLF on the phone side car, all they do is press the key next to BLF Parking completely works as expected Retrieval also works without a problem if done using *78 The problem is that once you park using Tranfer (Polycom EFK) in Legacy mode

Re: [sipx-users] single extension for multiple park orbits

2012-11-26 Thread Michael Picher
So, park with your hunt group, pickup with *78 + orbit # The problem is you don't know what orbit the call went into. Mike On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 12:27 PM, Ali Ardestani wrote: > The problem with call orbits with multiple calls is that I can not have > the BLF status indicating which call is

Re: [sipx-users] single extension for multiple park orbits

2012-11-26 Thread Michael Picher
Sorry, this isn't Asterisk. I think you are looking for what we call this valet parking and it is not implemented at this time. The reason why it hasn't been implemented in freeswitch and our software yet is that there was an issue with monitoring park orbits with line keys. Check the wiki there

Re: [sipx-users] single extension for multiple park orbits

2012-11-26 Thread Ali Ardestani
The problem with call orbits with multiple calls is that I can not have the BLF status indicating which call is parked at which park orbit meaning if we have multiple calls come in it is easier to park them at one of the orbits and later pick them up from the side car with the BLF indicating a park

Re: [sipx-users] single extension for multiple park orbits

2012-11-26 Thread Ali Ardestani
The main reason for this is that users are used to way aterisk does parking and retrieval and they are used to parking into one extension and then retrieve from the side car, the problem with parking and retrieval without the single extension is that users need to know to which call park orbit to p

Re: [sipx-users] single extension for multiple park orbits

2012-11-26 Thread Michael Picher
Sorry, to continue... You can transfer and park to individual orbits... not a hunt group. How do you know what orbit the calls go into? How would pickup know which one you are trying to retrieve? Why don't you just allow multiple calls in a park orbit and be done with it? Mike On Mon, Nov 2

Re: [sipx-users] single extension for multiple park orbits

2012-11-26 Thread Michael Picher
I don't this has a prayer of working. You can transfer and park to individual orbits... not a hunt group. On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 12:04 PM, Ali Ardestani wrote: > Hi all, > I have created extension which forwards to 701,702,703,704 - these > are four single call park orbits > > Parking us

Re: [sipx-users] single extension for multiple park orbits

2012-11-26 Thread Bryan Anderson
I have seen this as well but have not found a solution, but I have had very little time to look into it. We transfer directly to the Park orbits though, we don't use a forwarding extension. -Bryan Anderson On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 9:04 AM, Ali Ardestani wrote: > Hi all, > I have created extens

[sipx-users] single extension for multiple park orbits

2012-11-26 Thread Ali Ardestani
Hi all, I have created extension which forwards to 701,702,703,704 - these are four single call park orbits Parking using Transfer works without a problem However automatic retrieval using polycom side car keys has problems in both NATIVE and LEGACY modes. In Native mode it fails to alert t