[sipx-users] sipx really likes 1.5GB ram

2012-08-15 Thread Michael Scheidell
I recently moved sipx 4.4.0 off of an old dell 750 with 1gb ram. (it was crashing, corrupted the postgres db to the point of no return) I put it on an old dell 750 with 1.5Gb ram. the gui is SO MUCH MORE RESPONSIVE as to be unbelievable. 35 users (including virtual users) 18 phones. Mem:

Re: [sipx-users] sipx really likes 1.5GB ram

2012-08-15 Thread Michael Picher
Well, 2 GB is the minimum recommended for 4.4. 4 GB is the minimum recommended for 4.6. On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 8:27 AM, Michael Scheidell michael.scheid...@secnap.com wrote: I recently moved sipx 4.4.0 off of an old dell 750 with 1gb ram. (it was crashing, corrupted the postgres db to

Re: [sipx-users] sipx really likes 1.5GB ram

2012-08-15 Thread Michael Scheidell
looks like I need a bigger box! On 8/15/12 8:54 AM, Michael Picher wrote: Well, 2 GB is the minimum recommended for 4.4. 4 GB is the minimum recommended for 4.6. -- Michael Scheidell, CTO o: 561-999-5000 d: 561-948-2259 *| *SECNAP Network Security Corporation * Best Mobile Solutions

Re: [sipx-users] sipx really likes 1.5GB ram

2012-08-15 Thread Michael Scheidell
32 bit vs 64 bit? or doesn't matter? 64bit usually take up more address space, best I can tell. any advantage to (on 4.4? 4.6)? backing up my 32bit, getting a 64bit system, restoring it? On 8/15/12 8:54 AM, Michael Picher wrote: Well, 2 GB is the minimum recommended for 4.4. 4 GB is the

Re: [sipx-users] sipx really likes 1.5GB ram

2012-08-15 Thread Douglas Hubler
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 9:00 AM, Michael Scheidell michael.scheid...@secnap.com wrote: 32 bit vs 64 bit? or doesn't matter? 64bit usually take up more address space, best I can tell. definitely 64 bit because mongo db strongly recommends it any advantage to (on 4.4? 4.6)? backing up my

Re: [sipx-users] sipx really likes 1.5GB ram

2012-08-15 Thread Robert B
It's the stupid JVM... All those java processes gobble up memory for seemingly nothing more than shits and giggles. (Or it's remnant of the days when Sun sold servers and they wanted you to buy as much of their overpriced RAM as your wallet could tolerate.) This isn't a sipx issue, of course.

Re: [sipx-users] sipx really likes 1.5GB ram

2012-08-15 Thread Tony Graziano
Old argument. I've made it myself. Not sure the motive was to make people buy more memory, just how they wanted to make everything in memory and less dependent on storage. It's a two-edged sword for sure though. On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 10:37 AM, Robert B d...@spudland.com wrote: It's the

Re: [sipx-users] sipx really likes 1.5GB ram

2012-08-15 Thread Michael Scheidell
I worked for a company that sold 'real time' tools (real time as in, missile control, fly by wire, nuclear containment) if the tank for 'hot', you need to start the process (automatically) to pull the rods in 50 us (microseconds) someone came up with a 'real time java'. the biggest problem

Re: [sipx-users] sipx really likes 1.5GB ram

2012-08-15 Thread Joegen Baclor
On 08/16/2012 12:42 AM, Michael Scheidell wrote: you hear see the engineers at DOS, DISA, NASA, United Defense, laugh when you talk about 'real time java' Really not a place to ridicule a tool where such tool shined. (coming from a C++ perspective)

Re: [sipx-users] sipx really likes 1.5GB ram

2012-08-15 Thread Michael Scheidell
On 8/15/12 12:56 PM, Joegen Baclor wrote: On 08/16/2012 12:42 AM, Michael Scheidell wrote: you hear see the engineers at DOS, DISA, NASA, United Defense, laugh when you talk about 'real time java' Really not a place to ridicule a tool where such tool shined. (coming from a C++ perspective)