[Slackbuilds-users] Audacity vs. ffmpeg

2012-10-05 Thread Niki Kovacs
Hello, The Audacity page for 14.0 states that the application can optionally be compiled against ffmpeg, but indicates BROKEN ATM. I have a 14.0 box here where I've built much of SBo's multimedia stuff, mostly from your Git repo, and making small adjustments here and there. Just to say that

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Audacity vs. ffmpeg

2012-10-05 Thread Niki Kovacs
Le 05/10/2012 10:42, Niki Kovacs a écrit : Hello, The Audacity page for 14.0 states that the application can optionally be compiled against ffmpeg, but indicates BROKEN ATM. I have a 14.0 box here where I've built much of SBo's multimedia stuff, mostly from your Git repo, and making small

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Audacity vs. ffmpeg

2012-10-05 Thread Kemal Ilgar Eroglu
A few hours ago I have tried compiling with FFMPEG=yes and the build failed (with some ffmpeg related errors). From: Niki Kovacs i...@microlinux.fr To: SlackBuilds.org Users List slackbuilds-users@slackbuilds.org Sent: Friday, October 5, 2012 11:42 AM

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Audacity vs. ffmpeg

2012-10-05 Thread Petar Petrov
Quoting Kemal Ilgar Eroglu ilgar_ero...@yahoo.com: A few hours ago I have tried compiling with FFMPEG=yes and the build failed (with some ffmpeg related errors). From: Niki Kovacs i...@microlinux.fr To: SlackBuilds.org Users List

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Audacity vs. ffmpeg

2012-10-05 Thread Niki Kovacs
Le 05/10/2012 11:52, Petar Petrov a écrit : you followed this? Make sure to run this script in a real root shell (su -) and that you have either tetex or texlive installed. This is not a question of root shell vs. tetex installed. This is a) a basic requirement and b) a build dependency for

[Slackbuilds-users] gtk-kde4.SlackBuild

2012-10-05 Thread Mario
Hey everyone, ever since I abandoned above mentioned SB, I got emails about fixing it. Well, today I had some spare time, so here is a diff: http://mirror.slackverse.org/slackbuilds/fixed/gtk-kde4.diff And a complete thing ready for submission:

[Slackbuilds-users] postgresql.SlackBuild

2012-10-05 Thread Mario
Hey, I know its not the usual way, but if someone needs a bit better postgresql script, here it is: Patch against 14.0 SB: http://mirror.slackverse.org/slackbuilds/fixed/postgresql.diff Whole package: http://mirror.slackverse.org/slackbuilds/fixed/postgresql.tar.gz If author does not mind,

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] postgresql.SlackBuild

2012-10-05 Thread Binh Nguyen
On Fri, 05 Oct 2012 18:02:04 +0200 Mario ma...@slackverse.org wrote: If author does not mind, I could aswell take this one over, seeing how last update was last year(?), and postgres is such a nice database. You should send him an e-mail directly. Based on what you said, there's a good chance

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] postgresql.SlackBuild

2012-10-05 Thread Audrius Kažukauskas
On Fri, 2012-10-05 at 18:02:04 +0200, Mario wrote: I know its not the usual way, but if someone needs a bit better postgresql script, here it is: Patch against 14.0 SB: http://mirror.slackverse.org/slackbuilds/fixed/postgresql.diff Whole package:

[Slackbuilds-users] sbopkg and the README/.info files (REQUIRES line)

2012-10-05 Thread slakmagik
Because it wasn't a change in sbopkg itself, I forgot to include a note in the NEWS file about the new REQUIRES line in the .info file. Sbopkg has long provided the ability to use queuefiles and that doesn't change, so users are free to generate queues using the new .info info. Perhaps the

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] postgresql.SlackBuild

2012-10-05 Thread Mario
On 10/05/2012 06:45 PM, Audrius Kažukauskas wrote: 9.1.4 was released 2012-06-04[*], so the script was updated quite recently. Besides, there's no need to update it for every minor release, cause usually it's a simple version bump. And 9.2 happened while submissions to SBo were closed. [*]

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] postgresql.SlackBuild

2012-10-05 Thread Audrius Kažukauskas
On Fri, 2012-10-05 at 22:40:48 +0200, Mario wrote: Yeah, but I saw modified by the SBo project in there, thought it was abandoned, and that 2011 did not help either. Ah, yes, that could have been confusing. At least one of the scripts I maintain has this notice as well, though I'm not sure how

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] sbopkg and the README/.info files (REQUIRES line)

2012-10-05 Thread Binh Nguyen
On Fri, 05 Oct 2012 17:41:12 -0700 Phillip Warner pc_war...@yahoo.com wrote: You could potentially add a new option to sbopkg to generate a queue on the fly by recursively making use of the REQUIRES in the .info file of the selected SlackBuild and its respective required slackBuilds and so

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] sbopkg and the README/.info files (REQUIRES line)

2012-10-05 Thread slakmagik
On 2012-10-06 (Sat) 08:49:27 [+0700], Binh Nguyen wrote: On Fri, 05 Oct 2012 17:41:12 -0700 Phillip Warner pc_war...@yahoo.com wrote: You could potentially add a new option to sbopkg to generate a queue on the fly by recursively making use of the REQUIRES in the .info file of the

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] [sbopkg-users] sbopkg and the README/.info files (REQUIRES line)

2012-10-05 Thread Phillip Warner
You could potentially add a new option to sbopkg to generate a queue on the fly by recursively making use of the REQUIRES in the .info file of the selected SlackBuild and its respective required SlackBuilds and so on. I wouldn't recommend building directly from this. Rather the queue would have

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] sbopkg and the README/.info files (REQUIRES line)

2012-10-05 Thread Christoph Willing
On 06/10/2012, at 12:26 PM, slakmagik slakma...@gmail.com wrote: On 2012-10-06 (Sat) 08:49:27 [+0700], Binh Nguyen wrote: On Fri, 05 Oct 2012 17:41:12 -0700 Phillip Warner pc_war...@yahoo.com wrote: You could potentially add a new option to sbopkg to generate a queue on the fly by