On Mon, 20 Jan 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm wanting to restrict web access, using squid's acl, on two machines in
the local network here - 192.168.100.20 and 192.168.100.30
My theory on netmask addresses is poor, and I've been specifying the
addresses and netmask as
On Mon, Jan 20, 2003 at 07:41:11PM +1100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 20 Jan 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
addresses and netmask as 192.168.100.20-192.168.100.30/255.255.255.0
'192.168.100.20-192.168.100.30/255.255.255.0'
You should note that you'll also block 192.168.100.18, 18 19
Title: Message
Migrated mail
account. Testing.
#
dewald.troskie # dimension.data.south.africa # teamsource projects :: gensec
desk # tel ::
+27 (011) 575 2723 # cell :: +27 (084) 305 6157 # email ::
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To be honest the best way to get XP and Linux to work together is to
make a FAT 32 partition on the same system, or do what I did for a buddy
was I grabbed a second hand 1 gig hardisk and added it to his the system
and formated it as Fat32 this way both XP and Linux can read and write
to the same
what about trying another live cd such as Demo Linux? (I have seen some copies
in mags at the Newsagent recently)
http://www.demolinux.org/
On Mon, 20 Jan 2003 13:21, Mark A. Bell wrote:
Hi,
I have a friend who just got a Knoppix CD because she needs to edit
LaTex files with Emacs. She's a
On Tue, 2003-01-21 at 08:12, Alan L Tyree wrote:
On Mon, 2003-01-20 at 20:13, Ken Foskey wrote:
On Mon, 2003-01-20 at 16:51, Alan L Tyree wrote:
On Tue, 2003-01-21 at 06:27, James Gregory wrote:
On Sun, 2003-01-19 at 21:57, Alan L Tyree wrote:
I'm having trouble with a laptop
On Tue, 2003-01-21 at 08:38, Ken Foskey wrote:
ARRR! Bloody thing didn't work on boot this morning!
I changed it back to the original, shut the machine down. Restart:
during boot it reports that the eth0 config has failed, but when I log
in it is OK. I give up. Back to a nice simple dos
I have some ethernet attached printservers from Intel (much like HP's
Jetdirect boxes). These things can be administered via telnet or webbrowser.
The problem I'm having is that they reject any connection requests
(telnet and www) from my debian box running kernel 2.4.20. Other boxes
running
Hi,
Thanks to the list for helping me sort out
samba.
Just in case anyone else has problems I found the
following document really useful (thanks to someones suggestion)
DIAGNOSIS.txt
The problems was my Windows TCP/IP settings.
In the advances options in the TCP/IP properties under the
Matthias Oertli [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On the Debian 2.4.20 box the SYN, CWR and ECN flags are set to which the
printserver replies with RST and ACK set (causing the connection to be
terminated).
CWR=Congestion window reduced, ECN=ECN-Echo - Whatever that means.
This intrigues me.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matthias Oertli [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On the Debian 2.4.20 box the SYN, CWR and ECN flags are set to which the
printserver replies with RST and ACK set (causing the connection to be
terminated).
CWR=Congestion window reduced, ECN=ECN-Echo - Whatever that means.
There is one small problem I don't have a XP home cd rom
I have HP's recovery disks. which won't allow me to select
what partition size I'd like nor will it allow me to select
the format.
To be honest the best way to get XP and Linux to work together is to
make a FAT 32 partition on the same
Hi all,
I am testing out the use of Winbind to authenticate users (I will need this
soon to authenticate to a W2K domain). All seems fine, the server has joined
the domain and I cna et info back with wbinfo. However my reading of the
docs indicates that I should be able to login to the linux box
Hi all
This is an old problem with Samba which I have fixed before and have racked my
brains to try and remember how I fixed it or got around it with no luck.
Searched through the samba mailling list archives most of the day with no
luck either. The situation is:
Trying to add a Win2K
Managed to get around the problem mysql. One of the working Win2k machines on
the domain controlled by the Samba PDC has a copy of Norton Ghost Corporate
Edition (trialware) which I sued to remotely join the machine to the domain.
I am still interested in peoples experience with this problem
On Tue, 2003-01-21 at 13:41, Simon Bryan wrote:
The user is both a member of the domain and a local user on the Linux box.
The Linux Box is RH7.2 Samba 2.2.5
Any clues or good reading sources appreciated, or am I wrong and you can't
fo this?
What is the local uid? if its not ~1, then
16 matches
Mail list logo
