Chris Barnes wrote:
My suggestion, the Dlink DSL-500. They only cost about $200 from Harris
Technology.
I second that recommendation. The generation II ones have stacks of cool
features and are rock solid
dave
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription
hai
lookup traffic shaping on http://www.freshmeat.net
On Thu, 2004-04-29 at 07:15, Luke (Terry) Vanderfluit wrote:
Hi,
I have a linux gateway connected to the net (RedHat 9), with a small
network hanging off it.
I'd like to be able to regulate the flow of traffic to the separate
(fixed)
Hi people,
If you had a bunch of Knoppix boxes, one the server and the rest
workstations, anyone know of a nice way to have a HDD install, but have
mandatory profiles. IE, if users stuff up stuff on the desktop, their
profile is loaded fresh each time, on a per user basis. Any suggestions?
I
On 29/04/2004, at 10:25 PM, David Kempe wrote:
Hi people,
If you had a bunch of Knoppix boxes, one the server and the rest
workstations, anyone know of a nice way to have a HDD install, but
have mandatory profiles. IE, if users stuff up stuff on the desktop,
their profile is loaded fresh each
Tony Green wrote:
Perhaps a combo of pam_mkhomedir, /etc/skel and an 'rm -fr ~' in the
.profile (or equiv)?
yeah I was thinking that.
this tool might help:
http://extragear.kde.org/apps/kiosktool.php
locks down a kde desktop.. hrmm, i think the script way is a bit more
useful tho.
dave
--
on Fri, Apr 30, 2004 at 11:32:01AM +1000, Jared Pritchard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi -
Got a little problem. =)
We are getting reports back from other servers on the net saying our message
from something like [EMAIL PROTECTED] was rejected because of an
attached virus.
We get tonnes of
On Fri, 2004-04-30 at 11:32, Jared Pritchard wrote:
Hi -
Got a little problem. =)
We are getting reports back from other servers on the net saying our message
from something like [EMAIL PROTECTED] was rejected because of an
attached virus.
[..snip..]
Has anyone got ANY idea on what could
Jared Pritchard wrote:
Hi -
Got a little problem. =)
We are getting reports back from other servers on the net saying our message
from something like [EMAIL PROTECTED] was rejected because of an
attached virus.
Umm, you have a user 130Qe49y1 do you?
...snip.
Has anyone got ANY idea
On Fri, 30 Apr 2004, Jared Pritchard wrote:
Hi -
Got a little problem. =)
We are getting reports back from other servers on the net saying our message
from something like [EMAIL PROTECTED] was rejected because of an
attached virus.
we get these all the time. It's a result of spammers
All right. What an explosive cocktail of themes! Did you make sure that
representatives of the whole political spectrum will be there?
To: Jared Pritchard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Slug List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bcc:
Subject: Re: [SLUG] Server being used to relay emails
Reply-To:
In-Reply-To:
Ooops, sorry about the bogus mail content. This bit here is random
insertions from the rest of my outbox (fortunately not too
incrimination) :)
The rest of the message is all good.
On Fri, Apr 30, 2004, Mary Gardiner wrote:
All right. What an explosive cocktail of themes! Did you make sure
John Clarke wrote:
My usual response is something like this sent to the postmaster at the
site which sent the virus notification:
WARNING! Your message was infected by VIRUS:
Worm.SomeFool.Z
Well done. You bloody idiot.
Bloody idiot indeed!
You've notified the one person you
Sluggers,
just wondering if anyone can help out with a clamdscan problem. I'm using clamscan to scan
incomming e-mails under qmail-queue-scanner.pl and it's all working fine detecting virii
etc except for the fact that it takes around 2 secs to do the scan. So I wanted to use
clamdscan (the
On Fri, Apr 30, 2004 at 01:49:58PM +1000, Peter Rundle wrote:
Can't access the file ERROR
This message only appears in the source (I'm looking at clamav-0.70-rc
but it's probably the same in other versions) in one place in
clamd/scanner.c:
/* check permissions */
John Clarke wrote:
Are you running clamd as root or as a non-privileged user? Is the
directory containing the file readable by that user? /root is normally
only readable by root.
The solution, if you're running clamd as a non-privileged user, is to
put the files into a directory that the clamd
Thank you ppl -
That puts my mind to rest -
and thanks to the flood of fast responses!! Appreciated! =)
In case anyone else has missed it - here's a summary
A spammer or virus will forge (and most likely has in our case) a domain to
mask their own presence, so when the recipient replies
On Fri, Apr 30, 2004, Jared Pritchard wrote:
Any idea how we might try and find the real source AND/OR should we
report the abuse to some authority of some sort?
You'd need the headers of the original mail to find the machine that
passed the virus to the machine with the detector. You
clamdscan failing? maybe it clammed up!
Stuart.
Find local movie times and trailers on Yahoo! Movies.
http://au.movies.yahoo.com
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html
18 matches
Mail list logo
