On Tue, 2004-08-24 at 14:52, Jared Pritchard wrote:
> st1\:*{behavior:url(#default#ieooui) } --> --> /* Style
> Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Table Normal";
> mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
> mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-al
This one time, at band camp, Jared Pritchard wrote:
>Thanks for any help.
Maybe see what named-checkconf tells you, if you're running a recent BIND.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://spacepants.org/jaq.gpg
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au
This one time, at band camp, Tony Green wrote:
>I'm scratching my head over this one, hoping that someone'll be able to
>hit me with a clue stick.
>
>I've got a working nagios install but am having problems getting
>escalation working. The following escalation definitions are in place
>:
>
>===
> I'm scratching my head over this one, hoping that
> someone'll be able to
> hit me with a clue stick.
> I've got a working nagios install but am having
> problems getting
> escalation working. The following escalation
> definitions are in place
> :
>
> define serviceescal
On 24/08/2004, at 2:52 PM, Jared Pritchard wrote:
Just experiencing some crazy problems with ‘named’ (dns).
Our web server (which is also our gateway to the Internet for our
office machines) serves as a DNS and sporadically over the last couple
of days, for no known reason, named keeps failing an
Hi,
Just experiencing some crazy
problems with ‘named’ (dns).
Our web server (which is also our gateway to the Internet
for our office machines) serves as a DNS and sporadically over the last couple
of days, for no known reason, named keeps failing and every now and then
(between 15 mi
I'm scratching my head over this one, hoping that someone'll be able to
hit me with a clue stick.
I've got a working nagios install but am having problems getting
escalation working. The following escalation definitions are in place
:
define serviceescalation{
host_name
>
> You're using bash? zsh's completion is already smart like that and knows
> about what files a command takes, so tab completion of cds arguments only
> offers directory names.
grab a proper bash_completion http://www.caliban.org/bash/index.shtml
it mostly rocks.. I do need to tweak it a bit f
On Tue, 24 Aug 2004 11:32, Robert Collins wrote:
> On Tue, 2004-08-24 at 10:55 +1000, Peter Rundle wrote:
> > Sluggers,
> >
> > Quick Squid Question,
> >
> > is it possible to detect the users browser (assume yes) and then block /
> > ignore the request based on the browser being used (dunno).
> >
On Tue, 2004-08-24 at 10:55 +1000, Peter Rundle wrote:
> Sluggers,
>
> Quick Squid Question,
>
> is it possible to detect the users browser (assume yes) and then block /
> ignore the request based on the browser being used (dunno).
>
> I've been asked if it's possible to prevent users for acces
This one time, at band camp, Taryn East wrote:
>If I have a file called foobar and a directory called foobaz and I type
>"cd foo" and hit ...
>
>why does tab-completion offer both choices?
>
>AFAIK it makes no sense to cd to a file - so I was wondering why
>tab-completion isn't intelligent enough t
On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 10:55:49AM +1000, Peter Rundle wrote:
> is it possible to detect the users browser (assume yes) and then block /
> ignore the request based on the browser being used (dunno).
Something like this should work (warning: completely untested, if it
breaks you get to keep both
ok, I'm just curious...
If I have a file called foobar and a directory called foobaz and I type
"cd foo" and hit ...
why does tab-completion offer both choices?
AFAIK it makes no sense to cd to a file - so I was wondering why
tab-completion isn't intelligent enough to just not bother with files.
Sluggers,
Quick Squid Question,
is it possible to detect the users browser (assume yes) and then block /
ignore the request based on the browser being used (dunno).
I've been asked if it's possible to prevent users for accessing the
internet via I.E and force them to use Mozilla because of the s
Sounds weird. In case it helps, my experience was XP on a laptop,
installed Mandrake, mandrake re-sized the XP partion to 1/2 the disk,
wouldn't go lower. Mandrake installed AOK. Perhaps MS have altered
things with later versions to stop dual boot but I doubt it. Perhaps
the disk files are at all
Hi everyone,
I just bought a new LG LS50-6 laptop and want to
set it up as dual boot winxp/redhat. I installed Partition Magic 8 on the
hd and thought that resizing the partition would be easy, so that i can install
RH. However, PM wouldn't allow the resizing or creating of any partitions
16 matches
Mail list logo
