Ershad Shafi Chowdhury wrote:
The virtual hard disks are created as files. You should be able to
delete the files from windows explorer. search for *.vmdk and delete
all the junk in that directory.
Thanks for replying, Ershad.
Windows Explorer isn't available for the purpose. I was using a
When I deleted the VMware-server virtual hard disks, they were
actually moved to either root's or my .Trash directory, as appropriate.
Until they were deleted from whichever of those two directories they
were in, they continued to take up the same space as before their
deletion. Now that I've
Hi all,
I have been looking for a text to speech software, I have tried festival but
that didn't quite do what I wanted. It works well but the sound is not clear
enough and sometimes very hard to understand if the volume is not high.
Would anyone know any other software that I could use for
Thought I might throw this one out there, as I have no idea yet where to
even begin looking for information on it.
I have two ALSA devices; a sound card and a USB headset. Is there any
way to have sound input one one device routed and played via the other?
Specifically, I've got input coming in
On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 07:46:28PM EST, Vini Engel wrote:
Hi all,
I have been looking for a text to speech software, I have tried festival but
that didn't quite do what I wanted. It works well but the sound is not clear
enough and sometimes very hard to understand if the volume is not
vmware for Linux seems to work well for me anyhow...
don't know what probs you were having though...
ben
Leslie Katz wrote:
When I deleted the VMware-server virtual hard disks, they were
actually moved to either root's or my .Trash directory, as
appropriate. Until they were deleted from
savepart is free software for cloning...
Ben
Voytek Eymont wrote:
On Wed, December 6, 2006 10:27 am, Alan L Tyree wrote:
On Wed, 6 Dec 2006 10:02:02 +1100 (EST)
Voytek Eymont [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you really need to clone the whole system? I had a similar problem
recently -
Voytek Eymont wrote:
I have a RH system that is running out of disk space faster than I can
figure out what can I delete to gain space,
in the short term, I just need to give it more hardrive space, what are my
best options to clone the old 20GB IDE drive to a new 80GB IDE drive ?
can I
On Wed, December 6, 2006 1:24 pm, DaZZa wrote:
On 12/6/06, Voytek Eymont [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I want /tmp mounted as non-executable to prevent malware executed
through cms vulnerability (as it happened now twice in the last few
month...)
shouldn't that 'add a layer' of defense in case
On Wed, December 6, 2006 10:00 pm, Ben Buxton wrote:
Voytek Eymont wrote:
can I clone a running system ?
Yes, you can.
Ben, thanks for detailed info
what I really meant to ask, was 'can I copy/clone a running systems whilst
it's in normal operation'; I gather the answer is 'no'
Boot the
On Wed, December 6, 2006 1:23 pm, DaZZa wrote:
On 12/6/06, Voytek Eymont [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You realise it'd probably be easier to just stick the new drive in,
make partitions on it and move selected branches from your directory tree
to new mountpoints? Like /home and /var, for
Voytek Eymont wrote:
On Wed, December 6, 2006 10:00 pm, Ben Buxton wrote:
Voytek Eymont wrote:
can I clone a running system ?
Yes, you can.
Ben, thanks for detailed info
what I really meant to ask, was 'can I copy/clone a running systems whilst
it's in normal operation'; I gather the
I reckon this must be fairly common, but in my street I can see a LOT
of wireless n/w;s and most of them are default name NETGEAR and default
password passwordor 0 security. So I think that although the range
is good, its perhaps its too omni-directional? I have a Netgear router
and cannot
On 07/12/2006, at 4:57 AM, hav wrote:
I reckon this must be fairly common, but in my street I can see a LOT
of wireless n/w;s and most of them are default name NETGEAR and
default
password passwordor 0 security. So I think that although the
range
is good, its perhaps its too
On 12/7/06, hav [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am annoyed at Netgear, tomorrow I have to return the SC101 storage
central (which is running of my 646) because a) it only works with XP
SP2 and 2K SP4I need to run Mandriva, Win98 OSX too. My cousin
bought it - can anyone tell me a better way to
On Wednesday 06 December 2006 19:05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
never had this happen before.
usually you have to remove the VM from the list of servers in the
inventory first.
then blow away the files.
possibly something is still holding them open.
you could always reboot the host
This one time, at band camp, hav wrote:
I am annoyed at Netgear, tomorrow I have to return the SC101 storage
central (which is running of my 646) because a) it only works with XP
SP2 and 2K SP4
These have performed very poorly in reviews. Apparently the on-disk
filesystem is
On Wednesday 06 December 2006 19:05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The virtual hard disks are created as files. You should be able to
delete the files from windows explorer. search for *.vmdk and delete
all the junk in that directory.
Thanks for replying, Ershad.
Windows Explorer isn't
This one time, at band camp, Howard Lowndes wrote:
The NSW Department of Education and Training (DET) may increase the
penetration of Linux on its 165,000 desktop fleet because open source is
clearly an industry trend.
Because it's trendy? Yeesh! I couldn't think of a WORSE reason to make
Rev Simon Rumble wrote:
This one time, at band camp, Howard Lowndes wrote:
The NSW Department of Education and Training (DET) may increase the
penetration of Linux on its 165,000 desktop fleet because open source is
clearly an industry trend.
Because it's trendy? Yeesh! I couldn't think
This one time, at band camp, Ken Wilson wrote:
But this is how many people make decisions in areas that they are not
knowledgeable in. Once x is trendy then a generic manager will listen to
advice suggesting x, before that many will not move outside known/safe.
You only have to see how much
Rev Simon Rumble wrote:
This one time, at band camp, Howard Lowndes wrote:
The NSW Department of Education and Training (DET) may increase the
penetration of Linux on its 165,000 desktop fleet because open source is
clearly an industry trend.
Because it's trendy? Yeesh! I couldn't think
Hello everyone,
I'm having some errors while compiling the source code for an Eicon
Diva BRI card.
I am using Fedora Core 6 with a compiled from source Linux kernel
2.6.19. I have downloaded the Eicon Diva source RPM
(divas4linux_EICON-106.12-1.i386.rpm) and installed it already.
When I go to
On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 10:52:01PM +, Rev Simon Rumble wrote:
This one time, at band camp, Howard Lowndes wrote:
The NSW Department of Education and Training (DET) may increase the
penetration of Linux on its 165,000 desktop fleet because open source is
clearly an industry trend.
O Plameras wrote:
Just a footnote: one CANNOT register to be authoritative for a set of
public ip addresses that
one does not own. One has to pay (or be authorized by) the owner of the
public ip addresses to use
it for the services previously mentioned.
Um, I can point
Glen Turner wrote:
O Plameras wrote:
Just a footnote: one CANNOT register to be authoritative for a set of
public ip addresses that
one does not own. One has to pay (or be authorized by) the owner of
the public ip addresses to use
it for the services previously mentioned.
Um, I can point
On Thu Dec 07, 2006 at 15:17:47 +1100, O Plameras wrote:
Glen Turner wrote:
O Plameras wrote:
Just a footnote: one CANNOT register to be authoritative for a set of
public ip addresses that
one does not own. One has to pay (or be authorized by) the owner of
the public ip addresses to use
it for
Ben Leslie wrote:
On Thu Dec 07, 2006 at 15:17:47 +1100, O Plameras wrote:
Glen Turner wrote:
O Plameras wrote:
Just a footnote: one CANNOT register to be authoritative for a set of
public ip addresses that
one does not own. One has to pay (or be authorized by) the owner of
On Thu Dec 07, 2006 at 15:59:45 +1100, O Plameras wrote:
Ben Leslie wrote:
On Thu Dec 07, 2006 at 15:17:47 +1100, O Plameras wrote:
It's the reverse DNS that the owner of the IP address space controls.
So, what happens when you do,
www.example.aarnet.edu.au A IN
Ben Leslie wrote:
On Thu Dec 07, 2006 at 15:59:45 +1100, O Plameras wrote:
Ben Leslie wrote:
On Thu Dec 07, 2006 at 15:17:47 +1100, O Plameras wrote:
It's the reverse DNS that the owner of the IP address space controls.
So, what happens when you do,
quote who=O Plameras
The authority to associate NAME to ip address has to be propagated up to
the ROOT servers. You mean to say that AARNET can do this without the
express approval from the owners of 203.7.132.1 ? NO, aarnet.edu.au
cannot, otherwise it is against the rules and perhaps against
On Thu Dec 07, 2006 at 16:19:47 +1100, O Plameras wrote:
Ben Leslie wrote:
On Thu Dec 07, 2006 at 15:59:45 +1100, O Plameras wrote:
Ben Leslie wrote:
On Thu Dec 07, 2006 at 15:17:47 +1100, O Plameras wrote:
It's the reverse DNS that the owner of the IP address space controls.
O Plameras wrote:
The authority to associate NAME to ip address has to be propagated up to
the ROOT servers. You mean
to say that AARNET can do this without the express approval from the
owners of 203.7.132.1 ? NO, aarnet.edu.au cannot, otherwise it is against
the rules and perhaps against the
On Thu, 2006-12-07 at 15:59 +1100, O Plameras wrote:
So, what happens when you do,
www.example.aarnet.edu.au A IN 203.7.132.1
in your live DNS,
The name www.example.aarnet.edu.au will resolve to 203.7.132.1
It will resolve ONLY within aarnet.edu.au
Jeff Waugh wrote:
quote who=O Plameras
The authority to associate NAME to ip address has to be propagated up to
the ROOT servers. You mean to say that AARNET can do this without the
express approval from the owners of 203.7.132.1 ? NO, aarnet.edu.au
cannot, otherwise it is against the rules
On 12/7/06, O Plameras [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jeff Waugh wrote:
quote who=O Plameras
The authority to associate NAME to ip address has to be propagated up to
the ROOT servers. You mean to say that AARNET can do this without the
express approval from the owners of 203.7.132.1 ? NO,
Peter Hardy wrote:
O Plameras wrote:
The authority to associate NAME to ip address has to be propagated up
to the ROOT servers. You mean
to say that AARNET can do this without the express approval from the
owners of 203.7.132.1 ? NO, aarnet.edu.au cannot, otherwise it is
against
the rules
quote who=O Plameras
So, I know what I'm talking about if that's what you're asking.
Sorry Oscar, we're not asking you, we're telling you: You don't know what
you're talking about. Either you manage to so terribly miscommunicate, or
there are deep scars of voodoo throughout your knowledge.
On Thu Dec 07, 2006 at 16:52:21 +1100, O Plameras wrote:
Peter Hardy wrote:
O Plameras wrote:
The authority to associate NAME to ip address has to be propagated up
to the ROOT servers. You mean
to say that AARNET can do this without the express approval from the
owners of 203.7.132.1 ? NO,
On 12/7/06, Jeff Waugh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
quote who=O Plameras
So, I know what I'm talking about if that's what you're asking.
Sorry Oscar, we're not asking you, we're telling you: You don't know what
you're talking about. Either you manage to so terribly miscommunicate, or
there are
Ben Leslie wrote:
On Thu Dec 07, 2006 at 16:52:21 +1100, O Plameras wrote:
Peter Hardy wrote:
O Plameras wrote:
The authority to associate NAME to ip address has to be propagated up
to the ROOT servers. You mean
to say that AARNET can do this without the express approval from
On Thu Dec 07, 2006 at 17:08:37 +1100, O Plameras wrote:
So really, aarnet.edu.au doesn't need to propagate anything at all.
Do you mean once aarnet.edu.au enters www.example.aarnet.edu.au IN A
203.7.132.1
it will be propagated ? This is wrong. aarnet.edu.au is only a branch in
the DNS
On 07/12/06, O Plameras [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Peter Hardy wrote:
O Plameras wrote:
The authority to associate NAME to ip address has to be propagated up
to the ROOT servers. You mean
to say that AARNET can do this without the express approval from the
owners of 203.7.132.1 ? NO,
DaZZa wrote:
On 12/7/06, Jeff Waugh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
quote who=O Plameras
So, I know what I'm talking about if that's what you're asking.
Sorry Oscar, we're not asking you, we're telling you: You don't know
what
you're talking about. Either you manage to so terribly
miscommunicate,
On 07/12/06, O Plameras [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
DaZZa wrote:
On 12/7/06, Jeff Waugh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
quote who=O Plameras
So, I know what I'm talking about if that's what you're asking.
Sorry Oscar, we're not asking you, we're telling you: You don't know
what
you're talking
quote who=DaZZa
You've yet to explain to me what's behind plammered.perkypants.org.
I hope it's nothing bad - I'd hate to piss the boss off by doing it from
work. :-)
It resolves to the IP address Oscar is posting from (which just happens to
have an ssh server running on it). So, were his
On 12/7/06, O Plameras [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
DaZZa wrote:
On 12/7/06, Jeff Waugh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
quote who=O Plameras
So, I know what I'm talking about if that's what you're asking.
Sorry Oscar, we're not asking you, we're telling you: You don't know
what
you're talking about.
On 12/7/06, Jeff Waugh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
quote who=DaZZa
You've yet to explain to me what's behind plammered.perkypants.org.
I hope it's nothing bad - I'd hate to piss the boss off by doing it from
work. :-)
It resolves to the IP address Oscar is posting from (which just happens to
Jeff Waugh wrote:
quote who=O Plameras
The authority to associate NAME to ip address has to be propagated up to
the ROOT servers. You mean to say that AARNET can do this without the
express approval from the owners of 203.7.132.1 ? NO, aarnet.edu.au
cannot, otherwise it is against the rules
O Plameras wrote:
Ben Leslie wrote:
On Thu Dec 07, 2006 at 16:52:21 +1100, O Plameras wrote:
*snip*
I have first, second, and third editions. I have the third edition in
front of me.
The book covers the technical process. Unfortunately, it does not
cover the bureaucratic
processes. The
On Mon, 4 Dec 2006, Dimitri Koussa wrote:
On 22:09 Mon 04 Dec 06, Jeff Waugh spake thusly:
quote who=Dimitri Koussa
Does anyone know where I can obtain an Ubuntu install DVD?
Your best bet is to download and burn one (or find someone to download and
burn one for you).
I was hoping it
Penedo wrote:
On 07/12/06, O Plameras [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Peter Hardy wrote:
O Plameras wrote:
The authority to associate NAME to ip address has to be propagated up
to the ROOT servers. You mean
to say that AARNET can do this without the express approval from the
owners of
On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 06:04:03PM +1100, O Plameras wrote:
Plameras
Hi all,
This thread is done!
Any further posts to the list on this thread by 18.20 today will put the
list into full moderation mode for the next 3 days.
Your friendly list admins,
SLUG committee
--
http://slug.org.au/
Peter Hardy wrote:
O Plameras wrote:
Ben Leslie wrote:
On Thu Dec 07, 2006 at 16:52:21 +1100, O Plameras wrote:
*snip*
I have first, second, and third editions. I have the third edition
in front of me.
The book covers the technical process. Unfortunately, it does not
cover the
At 09:04 AM 7/12/2006, Howard Lowndes wrote:
http://www.zdnet.com.au/news/software/soa/Video_DET_considers_Linux_on_the_desktop/0,130061733,339272567,00.htm?feed=rss
The NSW Department of Education and Training (DET) may increase the
penetration of Linux on its 165,000 desktop fleet because
On Thu Dec 07, 2006 at 18:04:03 +1100, O Plameras wrote:
Penedo wrote:
On 07/12/06, O Plameras [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Because you don't understand that to be authoritative it involves
technical as
well as bureaucratice processes. You only know the technical aspect of it.
The technical aspect
Hi, I'm doing my best to get all the people involved in ComputerBank in
this state at least talking to each other. I know a lot of SLUG people
have been interested in the past and it's the only reason I'm CCing that
mailing list. Followups may be discussed off or on the SLUG list but I
request
57 matches
Mail list logo
