: Phill; slug@slug.org.au
Subject: Re: [SLUG] email server
if your running your webserver and your mail server on the same machine
then you just need https, connections from squirelmail to imap wont go
through the internet and so dont need to be encrypted
Dean
Michael Fox wrote:
On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 15
I am trying my hand at setting up an email server with webmail
access. Fedora 3 comes with squirrelmail but the login uses plain text
transfer. Can anyone recommend webmail software that forces at least encrypted
login but possibly secure transfer of mail as well?
Regards,
Phill
On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 15:42:26 +1100, Phill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am trying my hand at setting up an email server with webmail access.
Fedora 3 comes with squirrelmail but the login uses plain text transfer. Can
anyone recommend webmail software that forces at least encrypted login but
if your running your webserver and your mail server on the same machine
then you just need https, connections from squirelmail to imap wont go
through the internet and so dont need to be encrypted
Dean
Michael Fox wrote:
On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 15:42:26 +1100, Phill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am
I have done a netstat -an | grep 25 . Attached is the output.
By the way this is from the machine in question.
Thanks Jeff
tcp0 0 0.0.0.0:25 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN
unix 17 [ ] DGRAM1259 /dev/log
unix 3 [ ]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Tuesday 04 Feb 2003 12:58 pm, Jeff wrote:
I have done a netstat -an | grep 25 . Attached is the output.
That shows sendmail listening quite happily to anyone who cares to speak to
it. Read my previous email about what I believe is the problem, i.e. the
Hi Slugs,
We are getting lots of unrouteable mail domain messages both from internal
messages going out and we are hearing from others emailing us that emails
have been sent but bounced back from us. (Even this message bounced back
once)
I'm looking into frozen messages errors from the exim
?
Not sure about the errors, however my pick for MTA/pop server is postfix and
courier.
dave
- Original Message -
From: Ben Donohue [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 5:03 PM
Subject: [SLUG] email server errors
Hi Slugs,
We are getting lots of unrouteable
First, lets verify with the maths: a 56K modem's uplink is 33.6Kbps, 10
bits per byte [due to Async framing]. thats a maximum transfer speed of
3.3KB/sec. your 12K message would take approximately 3 seconds (actually, a
little over) to transmit.
Next, let's re-verify the maths.
- Original Message -
From: Mikolaj J. Habryn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Crossfire [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Steve Kowalik [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, December 30, 2000 7:29 PM
Subject: Re: [SLUG] Email Server
On 30 Dec 2000 18:03:23 +1100, Crossfire wrote:
[Brought
[Brought back onto the list - if you have anything you wish to add... - XF]
- Original Message -
From: Steve Kowalik [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Crossfire [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, December 30, 2000 2:11 AM
Subject: Re: [SLUG] Email Server
On Fri, Dec 29, 2000 at 01:54:05PM +1100
- Original Message -
From: Crossfire [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Alan Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 29, 2000 12:10 PM
Subject: Re: [SLUG] Email Server
3) Virtual hosting.
[SNIP]
Virtual Domain handling for outbound messages is handled via
qmail's smtpd via inetd is inefficent, making you use the author's silly
tcpserver thing (which is just as bad IMO). More cruft to install. :/
tcpserver is a godsend, and not at all cruft. Logging via IP, and defining
exactly what can and can't connect is a Good Thing[tm]
IP filtering is
Hey;
Im looking for an email server, which is easy to
install, easy to config, and keeps working. Its required to be able to
support multipical domains, and would be nice to have a web interface to
it..
.. What do other people use?
Regards, Alan Lee
sendmail is installed on most systems by default.
It works, and its not too bad when all is said and done
im a fan of qmail and exim.
i think exim maybe a little easier to set up but possibly
qmail has more available software.
www.qmail.org
www.exim.org
smail is supposed to be good
have a
quote who="Alan Lee"
Im looking for an email server, which is easy to install, easy to config, and
keeps working. Its required to be able to support multipical domains
Gosh! You must be talking about Postfix! :)
I've tried almost everything else (if you cite an esoteric MTA on Freshmeat
er 29, 2000 10:55 AM
Subject: Re: [SLUG] Email Server
sendmail is installed on most systems by default.
It works, and its not too bad when all is said and done
im a fan of qmail and exim.
i think exim maybe a little easier to set up but possibly
qmail has more available software.
www.qma
correctly.
Its kidna buggering me up.. heh
Regards, Alan Lee
- Original Message -
From: "Dean Hamstead" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "Alan Lee" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 29, 2000 10:55 AM
Subject: Re: [SLUG] Email Server
sendmail
If you are at all concerned about security, then you really only have
two choices qmail or postfix.
I am told that the setup and operation of postfix is quite similar to
that of sendmail...
Qmail is very different, but I like it. The licence it is under, makes
binary distribution basically
to be much information about this problem, or even
a real solution?
Regards, Alan Lee
- Original Message -
From: "Dave Kempe" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "Alan Lee" [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 29, 2000 11:04 AM
Subject: Re: [SLUG] Email Server
On Fr
- Original Message -
From: Alan Lee
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 29, 2000 10:44 AM
Subject: [SLUG] Email Server
Im looking for an email server, which is easy to install, easy to
config, and keeps working. Its required to be able to support
multipical domains
- Original Message -
From: "Colin Humphreys" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: "Alan Lee" [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 29, 2000 11:11 AM
Subject: Re: [SLUG] Email Server
If you are at all concerned about security, then you r
Hi all,
Assuming this arrives,(sadly a dubious prospect seemingly)
I'm getting jack of the rubbish that passes for tech support and mail
serving through bigpond.com
I've been losing incoming mail for days, and i've had enough.
How hard is it to set a machine up as a secondary mail server ?
As I understand it, you don't. You just set it up as a mail server that
collects the mail and passes it onto the main later, or have your
clients poll it as well.
However, it still relies on bigpond, or whoever provides your MX records
listing your secondary mail server in their nameserver
On Thu, 14 Sep 2000, Terry Collins generated:
Jason Rennie wrote:
But how do i get sendmail to accept mail as a secondary mail server ?
As I understand it, you don't. You just set it up as a mail server that
collects the mail and passes it onto the main later, or have your
clients poll it as
25 matches
Mail list logo
