On Tue, 2003-11-04 at 10:22, Jan Schmidt wrote:
> The key points that people are missing here:
* And nobody seems to be generating Mailman reports yet. :-(
--
Pete
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug
> If the s3kr1t keyword is '[SLUG]' and it has to appear in the subject,
> then I think we'd block at least 95% of spam. (to start with)
>
> plus you don't need to worry about replying, because your mailer
> will include '[SLUG]' in the header automatically.
>
The key points that people are mis
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 08:45:05AM +1100, Benno wrote:
> On Tue Nov 04, 2003 at 08:36:09 +1100, Peter Vogel wrote:
> >With my limited knowledge of such things, it seems like a lot of spam
> >could be prevented by blocking all mail that does not contain a simple keyword.
> >This keyword could be inc
On Tue Nov 04, 2003 at 08:36:09 +1100, Peter Vogel wrote:
>With my limited knowledge of such things, it seems like a lot of spam
>could be prevented by blocking all mail that does not contain a simple keyword.
>This keyword could be included in the footer of all mail going to the
>list as a reminde
With my limited knowledge of such things, it seems like a lot of spam
could be prevented by blocking all mail that does not contain a simple keyword.
This keyword could be included in the footer of all mail going to the
list as a reminder. It could even change from time to time.
Have I overlooked
This one time, at band camp, David Kempe wrote:
>- Original Message -
>From: "Peter Hardy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> I'll also be looking in to generating useful statistics from the mailman
>> logs, so we can have a much firmer idea of how effective the current
>> strategies are. Is there an
On Sat, 1 Nov 2003, David Kempe wrote:
> I had an idea once that to train these type of packages easily you could put
> a hyperlink at the bottom so you could train with a click. Much easier on
> admins etc.
> Of course it wouldn't make sense for the whole slug list to train.
> If you could have a
- Original Message -
From: "Peter Hardy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I'll also be looking in to generating useful statistics from the mailman
> logs, so we can have a much firmer idea of how effective the current
> strategies are. Is there any packages around that already do this? Any
> advice
On Fri, 2003-10-31 at 22:45, Mary Gardiner wrote:
> If you feel absolutely compelled to discuss this any further, do so on
> slug-chat. (Unless you are asking about configuration for lists YOU
> run.)
Well, now that you mention it... ;-)
I'd just like to clear up a few things that seemed to be lef
