Re: [SLUG] ot: Mac OSX and virii in the open

2003-10-11 Thread mlh
On Wed, 8 Oct 2003 20:36:14 +1000 (EST) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://www.swiss.ai.mit.edu/6805/articles/morris-worm.html Everyone mentions the morris worm. It's a poor example from an era where most UNIX boxes didn't even have a root passwd. ?!? Of course they had root passwords. THe

RE: [SLUG] ot: Mac OSX and virii in the open

2003-10-08 Thread Jasper Streit
I would take this article with a really BIG grain of salt, considering the fact that it is written by an apple employee. Talk about biased journalism! I see no reason why the os wouldn't be subject to a unix type virus. -J.L.E Streit- The Australian yesterday had a column from David Frith on

RE: [SLUG] ot: Mac OSX and virii in the open

2003-10-08 Thread Dave Airlie
a bit UNIX experience can tell you), it's just too hard. Virus writers just don't have the in depth knowledge to break the security models imposed by UNIX based OS platforms. Of course, I think you underestimate virus writers, if Linux becomes very popular (like Windows popular) I can see

Re: [SLUG] ot: Mac OSX and virii in the open

2003-10-08 Thread Ben de Luca
But how many of those are there? As the man said (and as anyone with a bit UNIX experience can tell you), it's just too hard. Im sorry but thats just stupid, its not too hard. There are probably just far more bored kids with windows computers.

Re: [SLUG] ot: Mac OSX and virii in the open

2003-10-08 Thread r.polanskis
On Wed, 8 Oct 2003, Ben de Luca wrote: But how many of those are there? As the man said (and as anyone with a bit UNIX experience can tell you), it's just too hard. Im sorry but thats just stupid, its not too hard. There are probably just far more bored kids with windows computers.

Re: [SLUG] ot: Mac OSX and virii in the open

2003-10-08 Thread Ben de Luca
That have access to pre-rolled virus and worm scripts. Add a poor security model and you have an exploit. On UNIX, the same kids usually have to work by first principles and they have neither the will, the patience or the experience. Those that do are already sysadmins and probably making

OS 9 ? RE: [SLUG] ot: Mac OSX and virii in the open

2003-10-08 Thread Voytek Eymont
** Reply to note from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed, 8 Oct 2003 19:29:41 +1000 (EST) I don't think it's biased. It's based on fact. I admit there's a little bit of marketing spin in it, but having used OSX for nearly a year now full time it tallys with my experience. Rachel, how different is

Re: OS 9 ? RE: [SLUG] ot: Mac OSX and virii in the open

2003-10-08 Thread r.polanskis
On Wed, 8 Oct 2003, Voytek Eymont wrote: how different is OS 9, is it still *nix based ? (I just learned my Macs are Imacs using OS 9 ) OS9 and OSX are completely different to one another. OS9 is a custom Apple designed OS written by Apple engineers in house while OSX of course is based on a

Re: OS 9 ? RE: [SLUG] ot: Mac OSX and virii in the open

2003-10-08 Thread David
If you are running MacOS9, you can forget virii to all intents ... they basically don't exist. The purist will tell you that there are some, but I've not seen a Mac virus on one of my boxen for over ten years, and as I've said previously, several of them are running on the net 24/7. MacOS9

Re: [SLUG] ot: Mac OSX and virii in the open

2003-10-07 Thread Ben de Luca
Ok, I will agree that writing virus's might be more simple and for that we get many many many many more times as many virus's compared to other OS's. But when you look at the mode of entry of the most damaging virus's in the last 18 months you see that a fair proportion of them are worms,

Re: [SLUG] ot: Mac OSX and virii in the open

2003-10-07 Thread Voytek Eymont
** Reply to note from Graham Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue, 7 Oct 2003 14:11:57 +1000 To mess up a Linux box, you need to work at it; to mess up your Windows box, you just need to work on it. not bad, though I like this one best that Tom sent me : My wife, bless her cottin socks, is a Mac

RE: [SLUG] ot: Mac OSX and virii in the open

2003-10-07 Thread Jasper Streit
fashionable GUIs! mutter mutter... Cheers, Jasper -J.L.E Streit- -Original Message- From: Voytek Eymont [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, 7 October 2003 12:19 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [SLUG] ot: Mac OSX and virii in the open Every so often, I have seen a number

RE: [SLUG] ot: Mac OSX and virii in the open

2003-10-07 Thread Visser, Martin (Sydney)
: Wednesday, 8 October 2003 7:31 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [SLUG] ot: Mac OSX and virii in the open ** Reply to note from Graham Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue, 7 Oct 2003 14:11:57 +1000 To mess up a Linux box, you need to work at it; to mess up your Windows box, you just need to work

Re: [SLUG] ot: Mac OSX and virii in the open

2003-10-07 Thread Benno
On Wed Oct 08, 2003 at 09:00:42 +1000, Visser, Martin (Sydney) wrote: The Australian yesterday had a column from David Frith on just this subject http://australianit.news.com.au/articles/0,7204,7457276%5E15423%5E%5Enbv %5E15309,00.html A quote: No-one, not even an administrator, is permitted to

[SLUG] ot: Mac OSX and virii in the open

2003-10-06 Thread Voytek Eymont
Every so often, I have seen a number of Q here regarding Apple Mac hardware, hence, I'm assuming there are some Mac hardware users here, are there any Mac OS users though ? Reading through a Mac book I picked up today (of all places, at everythinglinux) I now know that Mac OS is *nix based. But,

Re: [SLUG] ot: Mac OSX and virii in the open

2003-10-06 Thread Benno
On Tue Oct 07, 2003 at 12:18:41 +, Voytek Eymont wrote: Every so often, I have seen a number of Q here regarding Apple Mac hardware, hence, I'm assuming there are some Mac hardware users here, are there any Mac OS users though ? Reading through a Mac book I picked up today (of all places, at

Re: [SLUG] ot: Mac OSX and virii in the open

2003-10-06 Thread David
I've been running MacOS 9* for may years and have yet to see a virus. Several of my macs are exposed to the 'net (ie.. 24/7 connections). I think it's a case of: * Nobody can be bothered to write a virus for a mac * Mac's mostly aren't listening anyway * Mac's don't have the usual

Re: [SLUG] ot: Mac OSX and virii in the open

2003-10-06 Thread Ben de Luca
I think the major reason for a lack of virii on mac's so far is the over all small number of them. I have seen Viri on os9 nothing on osx as yet. On Tuesday, October 7, 2003, at 01:04 PM, David wrote: I've been running MacOS 9* for may years and have yet to see a virus. Several of my macs

Re: [SLUG] ot: Mac OSX and virii in the open

2003-10-06 Thread r.polanskis
On Tue, 7 Oct 2003, David wrote: I've been running MacOS 9* for may years and have yet to see a virus. Several of my macs are exposed to the 'net (ie.. 24/7 connections). I think it's a case of: * Nobody can be bothered to write a virus for a mac * Mac's mostly aren't listening anyway *

Re: [SLUG] ot: Mac OSX and virii in the open

2003-10-06 Thread r.polanskis
On Tue, 7 Oct 2003, Ben de Luca wrote: I think the major reason for a lack of virii on mac's so far is the over all small number of them. I disagree. I've had this argument on another list and the pervasive Windows argument doesn't wash. Writing exploits for Windows is like shooting fish in

Re: [SLUG] ot: Mac OSX and virii in the open

2003-10-06 Thread Graham Smith
On Tue, 7 Oct 2003 13:29, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 7 Oct 2003, Ben de Luca wrote: I think the major reason for a lack of virii on mac's so far is the over all small number of them. I disagree. I've had this argument on another list and the pervasive Windows argument doesn't wash.