On Thursday 01 June 2006 17:46, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Any alternative in OpenSource for GoogleEarth ?
>
> Tried running in Fedora wine, but keeps on locking up.
>
Much trying, no sucess (even with win4lin etc, fancy graphics requirements)
Why wont they do as googlemars?
http://www.go
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 01 June 2006 17:46, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Any alternative in OpenSource for GoogleEarth ?
Tried running in Fedora wine, but keeps on locking up.
Much trying, no sucess (even with win4lin etc, fancy graphics requirements)
Why wont they do as
O Plameras wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> On Thursday 01 June 2006 17:46, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Any alternative in OpenSource for GoogleEarth ?
>>>
>>> Tried running in Fedora wine, but keeps on locking up.
>>>
>>>
>> Much trying, no sucess (even with win4lin etc,
Hal wrote:
O Plameras wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 01 June 2006 17:46, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Any alternative in OpenSource for GoogleEarth ?
Tried running in Fedora wine, but keeps on locking up.
Much trying, no sucess (even with win4lin
does cedega give you better results than wine?
Dean
On Thu, June 1, 2006 9:44 pm, O Plameras wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> On Thursday 01 June 2006 17:46, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Any alternative in OpenSource for GoogleEarth ?
>>>
>>> Tried running in Fedora wine, but k
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 01 June 2006 17:46, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Any alternative in OpenSource for GoogleEarth ?
Tried running in Fedora wine, but keeps on locking up.
Much trying, no sucess (even with win4lin etc, fancy graphics requirements)
Why
On Thu, 2006-06-01 at 21:44 +1000, O Plameras wrote:
> A number of Linux users I know are switching to Windows because they
> want to run GoogleEarth. I can understand why they do. My son works
> for a Company that use GoogleEarth for work and had to switch to
> Windows.
>
> O Plameras
Just out
James Purser wrote:
On Thu, 2006-06-01 at 21:44 +1000, O Plameras wrote:
A number of Linux users I know are switching to Windows because they
want to run GoogleEarth. I can understand why they do. My son works
for a Company that use GoogleEarth for work and had to switch to
Windows.
O Plame
James Purser was once rumoured to have said:
> Just out of curiosity, have they considered running Windows under either
> VMWare's free server offering or QEMU? That way they can keep all their
> linuxy goodness and run the Windows based stuffs they need.
The main reason why VMWare, etc, are unsui
On Fri, 2006-06-02 at 10:28 +1000, Crossfire wrote:
> The main reason why VMWare, etc, are unsuitable, especially when
> GoogleEarth and things like it are involved, is performance. Google
> earth eats graphics cards for lunch. VMWare and most other vm hosting
> and emulated/dynamic recompilation
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Much trying, no sucess (even with win4lin etc, fancy graphics requirements)
Why wont they do as googlemars?
http://www.google.com/mars/
James
If you go to http://www.google.com/mars/about.html you will find out about where this
data comes from:
- Mars Orbiter Camer
'expect' might help you script it
if you cant get at source and need to bolt some cgi ontop of the curses
Dean
On Fri, June 2, 2006 12:58 pm, Michael Lake wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Much trying, no sucess (even with win4lin etc, fancy graphics
>> requirements)
>> Why wont they do as go
Dean Hamstead wrote:
'expect' might help you script it
if you cant get at source and need to bolt some cgi ontop of the curses
Actually it looks like a curses app but it's actually a "Transportable Applications
Environment" app which is a thing developed by NASA in the 1980's. But it looks th
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 01 June 2006 17:46, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Any alternative in OpenSource for GoogleEarth ?
Tried running in Fedora wine, but keeps on locking up.
Much trying, no sucess (even with win4lin etc, fancy graphics requirements)
Why wont they do as
TECTED]
> Sent: Friday, 2 June 2006 10:42 AM
> To: Crossfire
> Cc: slug@slug.org.au
> Subject: Re: [SLUG] GoogleEarth alternative in OpenSource
>
> On Fri, 2006-06-02 at 10:28 +1000, Crossfire wrote:
> > The main reason why VMWare, etc, are unsuitable, especially when
> >
O Plameras wrote:
> A number of Linux users I know are switching to Windows because they
> want to run GoogleEarth. I can understand why they do. My son works
> for a Company that use GoogleEarth for work and had to switch to
> Windows.
Can you tell us what they were actually doing?
I assume thi
On Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 02:18:03PM +1000, Roger Barnes wrote:
> I understand Google are working on a winelib based GoogleEarth
> for Linux, following on from their recent release of Picasa
> in the same vein.
>
> http://www.gearthblog.com/blog/archives/2006/05/google_earth_fo_4.html
That blog h
> http://www.gearthblog.com/blog/archives/2006/05/google_earth_fo_4.html
>
> That blog has a comment that suggests they're not using winelib:
>
> "...DiBona answered in the negative, explaining that Google
> Earth relied on Qt and GL libraries and code, so additional
> WINE supp
> > "...DiBona answered in the negative, explaining that Google Earth relied
> > on Qt and GL libraries and code, so additional WINE support would not
> > help."
>
> I took that to mean that they might "port" it using wine, but without
> doing additional work on wine itself?
No, it means that W
SLUG feeding spam to the world wrote:
O Plameras wrote:
A number of Linux users I know are switching to Windows because they
want to run GoogleEarth. I can understand why they do. My son works
for a Company that use GoogleEarth for work and had to switch to
Windows.
Can you tell us w
O Plameras wrote:
Okay.
> But if you want to know additional info about GoogleEarth, check this page:
I've been playing with it on the other boxen with the idea of doing away
with some guide books that need republishing. Unfortunately it is rather
lacking in what you can do.
OTOH, neither is th
SLUG feeding spam to the world wrote:
O Plameras wrote:
Okay.
But if you want to know additional info about GoogleEarth, check this page:
I've been playing with it on the other boxen with the idea of doing away
with some guide books that need republishing.
Do you mean travel guide b
Dean Hamstead wrote:
does cedega give you better results than wine?
Have not tried cedega yet.
Would love too, when time permits.
For the moment, GoogleEarth is just running
happily on my Win XP.
Thanks.
O Plameras
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Su
O Plameras wrote:
Warning, this gets long, but I think it is a good idea to throw it out
there as someone may have some ideas. Borderling OT, but it is comparing
FOSS with so okay..
>> I've been playing with it on the other boxen with the idea of doing away
>> with some guide books that nee
Hi all
SLUG feeding spam to the world wrote:
My main recreational interest is bicycles and my motivation is the more
2) The quality of the GE background is crap and makes digitising
exceedingly difficult. It isn't feasible to re-ride all the routes (hey,
I'm open to funding offers though
Michael Lake wrote:
>> So, the current problem is finding FOSS or affordable software to do
>> this good gis work. I have recently been through FOSS offerings, many
>> and scattered functionality and it looks like a write your own situation.
>
>
> Look at GRASS. It's a FOSS GIS.
> http://www.geo
26 matches
Mail list logo
