> On Jan 10, 2017, at 23:45, Riccardo Murri wrote:
>
>
> (Ryan Novosielski, Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 02:16:07PM -0800:)
>> I actually just answered this question the other day. Take a look in
>> the archives. The gist of it appears to be that slurmdbd will fix that
>> address to be whatever address
(Ryan Novosielski, Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 02:16:07PM -0800:)
> I actually just answered this question the other day. Take a look in
> the archives. The gist of it appears to be that slurmdbd will fix that
> address to be whatever address slurmctld uses to connect to it.
Many thanks Ryan, this was e
I actually just answered this question the other day. Take a look in the
archives. The gist of it appears to be that slurmdbd will fix that address to
be whatever address slurmctld uses to connect to it.
There’s also a bug/enhancement related to this a few point releases back on
15.08 that addr
Hello,
we have an issue with (apparently) slurmdbd->slurmctld communication.
Both daemons are running on the same machine, which got reinstalled last
week and got a new IP address. The new IP address has been written in
`slurm.conf`, and every thing seems to work fine -- except new
associations
Dear Andy,
dear Manuel,
I cannot comment on the comparison between 16.05.0 and 16.05.7 but we noticed a
similar change in behavior between 14.03 and 16.05.X (X > 0) which we
attributed to the following patch:
commit 064cdb5eb6ea95ca23b1d5118b96dd04aa4c7e06
Author: David Bigagli
Date: Thu Au
Hi Manuel,
Yours is the first response I've had to my query.
Andy
On 01/10/2017 12:58 PM, Manuel Rodríguez Pascual wrote:
Hi Andy,
I was facing the same issue, but I was worried that it was because
something missconfigured or whatever. Did you receive an
answer/explanation from anybody?
Ch
Yeah. I think that is the default for Torque. We are seeking a
solution similar to Torque on Slurm.
We were wondering if there is such feature on Slurm which is configurable.
Thanks
Steven.
On 01/09/2017 11:56 PM, Ole Holm Nielsen wrote:
On 01/10/2017 12:46 AM, Christopher Samuel wrote
Hi Andy,
I was facing the same issue, but I was worried that it was because
something missconfigured or whatever. Did you receive an
answer/explanation from anybody?
Cheers,
Manuel
2017-01-05 12:00 GMT-05:00 Andy Riebs :
>
> Hi Y'all,
>
> Historically, our users often use srun from their con
Yeah. That's the question that we have "Is there a default always mail
anyone who ever runs a job to their
email address that can be set in slurm.conf?"
Thanks
Steven.
On 01/09/2017 03:32 PM, Lachlan Musicman wrote:
Re: [slurm-dev] mail job status to user
Not 100% sure what you are asking
Hello,
Really hoping for insight here.
I have a cluster, lets say T-CLUSTER.
with servers and features like this:
srv1 features=fit1
srv2 features=fit1
srv3 features=fit1
mok1 features=fit2
mok2 features=fit2
mok3 features=fit2
I sent 3000 jobs to this cluster with --constraint=fit1 and then sent
10 matches
Mail list logo
