871270, ...}) = 0
write(3, "[2017-10-17T17:09:04.168] Warnin"..., 132) = 132
+++ killed by SIGSEGV (core dumped) +++
We're running 17.02.7. Any ideas?
Cheers,
Loris
--
Dr. Loris Bennett (Mr.)
ZEDAT, Freie Universität Berlin Email loris.benn...@fu-berlin.de
nd the statesave location.
> If anyone has an advice or would like to tell me how it was solved on your
> site,
> I would be very happy.
>
>
> best
> Marcus
Cheers,
Loris
--
Dr. Loris Bennett (Mr.)
ZEDAT, Freie Universität Berlin Email loris.benn...@fu-berlin.de
g. In your case,
only the database is worth backing up, and even then, that's only really
interesting if you need the old data for statistical purposes, or you
need to maintain, say, fairshare information across the upgrade.
In bocca al lupo!
Loris
--
Dr. Loris Bennett (Mr.)
ZEDAT, Freie Universität Berlin Email loris.benn...@fu-berlin.de
x27;t be any such jobs. In this case, there shouldn't in theory
be a problem - although I must admit that I wouldn't be that surprised
if converting the database from 2.3.4 to, say, 17.02.7 didn't go 100%
smoothly. However, Debian users who just rely on Debian packages are
al
"Have you tried turning it off and then on again?"
is still often a valid suggestion.
Cheers,
Loris
--
Dr. Loris Bennett (Mr.)
ZEDAT, Freie Universität Berlin Email loris.benn...@fu-berlin.de
Hi Chris,
Christopher Samuel writes:
> On 20/09/17 15:53, Loris Bennett wrote:
>
>> Having said that, the only scenario I can see being easily automated is
>> one where each user only has one association, namely with their Unix
>> group, and everyone has equal shares.
g easily automated is
one where each user only has one association, namely with their Unix
group, and everyone has equal shares. This is our set up, but as soon
as you have, say, users with multiple associations and/or membership in some
associations confers more shares automation becomes very
600) && (susp_total > 0)) {
info("Power save mode: %d nodes", susp_total);
I assume that shown line can no longer appear.
--
Dr. Loris Bennett (Mr.)
ZEDAT, Freie Universität Berlin Email loris.benn...@fu-berlin.de
power used by
nodes? If so, what debug flags should I be using?
Cheers,
Loris
--
Dr. Loris Bennett (Mr.)
ZEDAT, Freie Universität Berlin Email loris.benn...@fu-berlin.de
Loris Bennett writes:
> Hi,
>
> I have a node which is powered on and to which I have sent a job. The
> output of sinfo is
>
> PARTITION AVAIL TIMELIMIT NODES STATE NODELIST
> test up 7-00:00:00 1 mix~ node001
>
> The output of squeue
its run-time beyond the
'MaxTime' of the partition.
Cheers,
Loris
--
Dr. Loris Bennett (Mr.)
ZEDAT, Freie Universität Berlin Email loris.benn...@fu-berlin.de
to act directly upon the
> job. However, if it's possible to down the node, that should requeue (or
> cancel) the job.
>
> Best,
> Lyn
>
> On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 3:40 AM, Loris Bennett
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have a node which is powered on and to wh
in a power-saving state, which
in our case is powered-off.
This problem may have existed in 16.05.10-2, but currently we are using
17.02.7. All other nodes in the cluster apart from one are functioning
normally.
Does anyone have any idea what we might be doing wrong?
Cheers,
Loris
--
Dr.
reintroduce the old
functionality, say, with a option '--include'?
Cheers,
Loris
--
Dr. Loris Bennett (Mr.)
ZEDAT, Freie Universität Berlin Email loris.benn...@fu-berlin.de
lues for
other time periods).
I'm going to read the data into R, so I can do the roll-up there, but I
wondered whether I can get the information directly from Slurm.
Cheers,
Loris
--
Dr. Loris Bennett (Mr.)
ZEDAT, Freie Universität Berlin Email loris.benn...@fu-berlin.de
orage is disabled
>
> How to solve this problem?
>
> Regards, Sema.
>
> On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 4:25 PM, Loris Bennett
> wrote:
>
> Sema Atasever writes:
>
> > Elapsed time for slurm job
> >
> > Dear Friends,
> >
> > How can i ret
Sema Atasever writes:
> Elapsed time for slurm job
>
> Dear Friends,
>
> How can i retrieve elapsed time if the slurm job has completed?
>
> Thanks in advance.
sacct -o jobid,elapsed
See 'man sacct' or 'sacct -e' for the full list of fields.
Cheers,
e a common config file, where things such
as
paths to binaries, USERLIST and username lengths are defined.
Cheers,
Loris
--
Dr. Loris Bennett (Mr.)
ZEDAT, Freie Universität Berlin Email loris.benn...@fu-berlin.de
Hi Dennis,
Dennis Tants writes:
> Hello Loris,
>
> Am 10.07.2017 um 07:39 schrieb Loris Bennett:
>> Hi Dennis,
>>
>> Dennis Tants writes:
>>
>>> Hi list,
>>>
>>> I am a little bit lost right now and would appreciate your help.
>&
anks,
> Roy
What value of SelectType are you using? Note also that CR_LLN schedules
jobs to the least loaded nodes and so until all nodes have one job, you
will not more than one job per node. See 'man slurm.conf'.
Regards
Loris
--
Dr. Loris Bennett (Mr.)
ZEDAT, Freie Universität Berlin Email loris.benn...@fu-berlin.de
recommend better configurations I would
> glady hear them.
> Should you need any more information I will provide them.
> Thank you for your time!
Shouldn't the variable be $SBATCH_JOB_NAME?
Cheers,
Loris
--
Dr. Loris Bennett (Mr.)
ZEDAT, Freie Universität Berlin Email loris.benn...@fu-berlin.de
server running slurmctld,
the number of jobs, and the amount of memory required per job.
So roughly how much memory will be required per job?
Cheers,
Loris
--
Dr. Loris Bennett (Mr.)
ZEDAT, Freie Universität Berlin Email loris.benn...@fu-berlin.de
MIT NODES STATE NODELIST
>
> debug* up infinite 1 idle punehpcdl01
It means that 'debug' is the default partition. See 'man sinfo'.
Cheers,
Loris
--
Dr. Loris Bennett (Mr.)
ZEDAT, Freie Universität Berlin Email loris.benn...@fu-berlin.de
oris
> Thanks and Regards
> Sourabh
>
> Regards,
> Sourabh Shinde
> +49 176 4569 5546
> sourabhshinde.cf
>
> On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 8:02 AM, Loris Bennett
> wrote:
>
> Hi Sourabh,
>
> sourabh shinde writes:
>
> > Multifactor Priority Plugin
16:52:49
1699682.0 0.00G 34Gc 16:52:48
Has this been fixed in more recent versions?
Cheers,
Loris
--
Dr. Loris Bennett (Mr.)
ZEDAT, Freie Universität Berlin Email loris.benn...@fu-berlin.de
component to the multifactor priority plugin which would do the
same thing. Is there any way to do this, short of writing one's own
version?
Cheers,
Loris
--
Dr. Loris Bennett (Mr.)
ZEDAT, Freie Universität Berlin Email loris.benn...@fu-berlin.de
out
to correspond to how you have configured the shares.
If you only have a small amount of resources and a small number of
users, this may not work very well. Have you looked at Gang scheduling
without premption?
Cheers,
Loris
--
Dr. Loris Bennett (Mr.)
ZEDAT, Freie Universität Berlin Email loris.benn...@fu-berlin.de
nversion has been 100% completed?
>
> Question 2: Can anyone confirm that the output "slurmdbd: debug2: Everything
> rolled up" indeed signifies that conversion is complete?
>
> Thanks,
> Ole
>
>
--
Dr. Loris Bennett (Mr.)
ZEDAT, Freie Universität Berlin Email loris.benn...@fu-berlin.de
Michael Jennings writes:
> On Thursday, 22 June 2017, at 04:19:04 (-0600),
> Loris Bennett wrote:
>
>> rpmbuild --rebuild --with=slurm --without=torque pdsh-2.26-4.el6.src.rpm
>
> Remove the equals signs. I have no problems building pdsh 2.29 via:
>
> rpmb
build' line
rpmbuild --rebuild --with=slurm --without=torque pdsh-2.26-4.el6.src.rpm
fails with
--with=slurm: unknown option
The page https://github.com/grondo/pdsh implies it should be
rpmbuild --rebuild --with-slurm --without-torque pdsh-2.26-4.el6.src.rpm
but this also fails:
Hi,
Kent Engström writes:
> "Loris Bennett" writes:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I can generate a list of node lists on which the jobs of a given user
>> are running with the following:
>>
>> $ squeue -u user123 -h -o "%N"
>> n
ted
>
> should also do it... Slightly better to remember ;)
>
> On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 02:59:11AM -0600, Loris Bennett wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I can generate a list of node lists on which the jobs of a given user
>> are running with the following:
>
tion to allow the delimiter in the output
of 'scontrol show hostname' to be changed from an newline to, say, a
comma? That would permit easier manipulation of node lists without
one having to google the appropiate sed magic.
Cheers,
Loris
--
Dr. Loris Bennett (Mr.)
ZEDAT, Freie Uni
program doing something wrong, such as trying
to write beyond the bounds of an array.
This is probably unrelated, but the value of --cpus-per-task is quite
high. Do the nodes have 20 CPUs each?
Cheers,
Loris
> On 21 June 2017 at 05:45, Loris Bennett wrote:
>
> Hi Djibril,
>
>
that it indicates that your program experienced a
segmentation fault.
Cheers,
Loris
--
Dr. Loris Bennett (Mr.)
ZEDAT, Freie Universität Berlin Email loris.benn...@fu-berlin.de
Hi Ole,
Ole Holm Nielsen writes:
> On 06/20/2017 04:32 PM, Loris Bennett wrote:
>> We do our upgrades while full production is up and running. We just stop
>> the Slurm daemons, dump the database and copy the statesave directory
>> just in case. We then do the update, an
more specific DB optimization tricks could be
> done, but I'm not a DB admin so I won't venture to say.
>
> -Paul Edmon-
>
> On 06/20/2017 08:42 AM, Tim Fora wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Upgraded from 15.08 to 17.02. It took about one hour for slurmdbd t
g enough to allow me to get
slightly uneasy, but not long enough for me to really worry, so I guess
it was probably around 10-15 minutes. Our CPUs are around 6 years old,
but the DB is on an SSD.
HTH
Loris
--
Dr. Loris Bennett (Mr.)
ZEDAT, Freie Universität Berlin Email loris.benn...@fu-berlin.de
sinfo --version
slurm 16.05.10-2
[root@node003 ~]# sinfo -o '%t %E' -hn `hostname`
mix none
[root@node003 ~]# sinfo -hn `hostname`
test up3:00:00 0n/a
main* up 14-00:00:0 1mix node003
gpuup 14-00:00:0 0n/a
HTH,
Loris
--
Dr. Loris Bennett (Mr.)
ZEDAT, Freie Universität Berlin Email loris.benn...@fu-berlin.de
> Am 09.06.2017 um 12:02 schrieb Loris Bennett:
>>
>> Hi Marcel,
>>
>> Marcel Sommer writes:
>>
>>> Slurm accounting problem with GPFS
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> we are running slurm 2.6.5 and we have a master and a bac
Due to a security vulnerability (CVE-2016-10030), all versions of
Slurm prior to 15.08.13 or 16.05.8 are no longer available.
So you need to do an update anyway. And as the intermediate versions
are now no longer available, you basically just need to set up Slurm
again from scratch.
Sor
nth.
Disclaimer: I haven't used these settings - I am repeating what it
says in the documentation.
Cheers,
Loris
--
Dr. Loris Bennett (Mr.)
ZEDAT, Freie Universität Berlin Email loris.benn...@fu-berlin.de
o be more specific about what you don't understand.
The documentation you refer to seems to me to be fairly clear. As
described, the parameters just allow you to set various time periods
after which various types of entries in the database will be purged.
I'm not sure how a diagram wou
Edward Walter writes:
> On 06/06/2017 05:29 AM, Loris Bennett wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> We used to tell users that they could specify the '--x11' option
>> to run a graphical application interactively within a Slurm job.
>> With version 16.05.10-2
m/faq.html#terminal
(or one of the various modifications/forks)?
Cheers,
Loris
--
Dr. Loris Bennett (Mr.)
ZEDAT, Freie Universität Berlin Email loris.benn...@fu-berlin.de
e had a similar issue and come up with a solution?
Cheers,
Loris
--
Dr. Loris Bennett (Mr.)
ZEDAT, Freie Universität Berlin Email loris.benn...@fu-berlin.de
Hi Benjamin,
Benjamin Redling writes:
> Hi,
>
> Am 31.05.2017 um 10:39 schrieb Loris Bennett:
>> Does any one know whether one can run multinode MATLAB jobs with Slurm
>> using only the Distributed Computing Toolbox? Or do I need to be
>> running a Distributed Compu
gt; [0] Nodes in our cluster depending on their age have between 12-24
>> processors available. If
>> a user wants a parpool of 24, they must request either a constraint or a
>> combination of -N 1
>> and --ntasks-per-node=24, for example.
>>
>> HTH, John
Hi,
Does any one know whether one can run multinode MATLAB jobs with Slurm
using only the Distributed Computing Toolbox? Or do I need to be
running a Distributed Computing Server too?
Cheers,
Loris
--
Dr. Loris Bennett (Mr.)
ZEDAT, Freie Universität Berlin Email loris.benn...@fu
't be correct and are
probably causing the NaNs as calculating the NormUsage is probably
failing because the sum of the RawUsages is not a sensible value. The
number 9223372036854775808 equals 2**63, i.e. 1 larger than the largest
signed 64-bit integer, which looks like some sort of overflow or typ
0.0005946 1.000
> 0.000
> 260160.0026513 nan0.0005946 1.000
> 0.000
> 259880.0717221 nan0.0010979 1.000
> 0.000
What about
sshare -la
? That should show you something abou
03 63nan 1
> 1000 0 0
> 25999 djb1 -922337203 2nan 1
> 1000 0 0
> 26000 djb1 -922337203 2nan 1
> 10
e a bit of a faff setting up and maintaining shares.
All our users have equal shares and only belong to one account, so when
we add a users, we just automatically increment all the shares up to the
top of the hierarchy and decrement correspondingly when the user is
deleted.
HTH
Loris
--
Dr. Loris Bennett (Mr.)
ZEDAT, Freie Universität Berlin Email loris.benn...@fu-berlin.de
just that - weights. If you had, say, a partition with a very large
priority, then multiplying it by 1000 could push the total priority over
the size of a 32-bit integer.
What kinds of values does 'sprio -l' show?
Cheers,
Loris
--
Dr. Loris Bennett (Mr.)
ZEDAT, Freie Universität Berlin Email loris.benn...@fu-berlin.de
Ole Holm Nielsen writes:
> On 04/05/2017 03:59 PM, Loris Bennett wrote:
>
>> We are running 16.05.10-2 with power-saving. However, we have noticed a
>> problem recently when nodes are woken up in order to start a job. The
>> node will go from 'idle~' to, sa
slurmctd on the administration
node. Does anyone have any idea what might be going on?
Cheers,
Loris
--
Dr. Loris Bennett (Mr.)
ZEDAT, Freie Universität Berlin Email loris.benn...@fu-berlin.de
shortened for 'MaxSubmitPU' is probably just used for display.
HTH
Loris
--
Dr. Loris Bennett (Mr.)
ZEDAT, Freie Universität Berlin Email loris.benn...@fu-berlin.de
n, er,
error?
Cheers,
Loris
--
Dr. Loris Bennett (Mr.)
ZEDAT, Freie Universität Berlin Email loris.benn...@fu-berlin.de
> RELEASE_NOTES file available in the source.
>
> Thanks to all involved!
>
> Slurm downloads are available from https://schedmd.com/downloads.php.
This link currently (09:50 CET) just returns the following:
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
Cheers,
Loris
--
be useful:
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/slurm-devel/nf7JxV91F40/KUsS1AmyWRYJ
The code heuristically decides how to deal with inconsistencies in the
database and produces an SQL script to fix them as well as a second
script to roll back the changes.
Cheers,
Loris
--
Dr. Loris Bennett (Mr.)
ZEDAT, Freie Universität Berlin Email loris.benn...@fu-berlin.de
ess (e.g. 14.11.x or 15.08.x to 16.05.x)
without loss of jobs or other state information
I have updated Slurm a few times already and I am a native English
speaker, but I still stumble over the current wording.
Cheers,
Loris
--
Dr. Loris Bennett (Mr.)
ZEDAT, Freie Universität Berlin Em
more like taking nodes offline in times of
> low usage?
Yes, because that's what I'm interested in ;-)
Cheers,
Loris
--
Dr. Loris Bennett (Mr.)
ZEDAT, Freie Universität Berlin Email loris.benn...@fu-berlin.de
and 'node_start' more than something like
ipmitool -H $host chassis power on
?
Cheers,
Loris
--
Dr. Loris Bennett (Mr.)
ZEDAT, Freie Universität Berlin Email loris.benn...@fu-berlin.de
The login name. Only lowercase usernames are supported.
If you are importing the usernames from another system, you could filter
them in some way. We import from a central university LDAP server to our
own LDAP server and can thus tweak the attributes or add attributes,
such as 'loginShell'.
Cheers,
Loris
--
Dr. Loris Bennett (Mr.)
ZEDAT, Freie Universität Berlin Email loris.benn...@fu-berlin.de
x27;t have any problem
with small jobs starving. On the contrary, as we share nodes, small
jobs with moderate memory requirements have an advantage, as there are
always a few cores available somewhere in the cluster, even when it is
quite full. For this reason we favour large jobs slighty.
> Your a
large MPI jobs.
The total number of jobs a user can have in the test/debug QOS is
limited.
Cheers,
Loris
--
Dr. Loris Bennett (Mr.)
ZEDAT, Freie Universität Berlin Email loris.benn...@fu-berlin.de
S: one for
normal jobs and one for test jobs. The latter could have a higher
priority, but only a short maximum run-time and possibly a low maximum
number of jobs per user.
Cheers,
Loris
--
Dr. Loris Bennett (Mr.)
ZEDAT, Freie Universität Berlin Email loris.benn...@fu-berlin.de
thought that in general you want to use 'fairshare' as
well, but that obviously depends on what you are trying to achieve.
> In any case thanks for your help
>
> David
Regards
Loris
--
Dr. Loris Bennett (Mr.)
ZEDAT, Freie Universität Berlin Email loris.benn...@fu-berlin.de
ob=$SLURM_JOB_ID >
> $recordsdir/$SLURM_JOBID.record
>
> The `scontrol show jobid=` record is saved to the file system for future
> reference if it is needed.
It might be worth using the option '--oneliner' to print out the record
in a single line. You could then p
Loris Bennett writes:
> Hi,
>
> Ulf Markwardt writes:
>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> we are using CR_Core_Memory, granularity of our jobs is cores, so:
>> shared nodes. And all is well, jobs get killed once they use too much
>> memory, cgroups are in place.
en I do not get the chance to run on 12
> cores/32 GB.
>
> Is there already a parameter in Slurm to handle this?
>
> Thanks,
> Ulf
Wouldn't the sbatch option
--exclusive
help?
Cheers,
Loris
--
Dr. Loris Bennett (Mr.)
ZEDAT, Freie Universität Berlin Email loris.benn...@fu-berlin.de
in(licence_strings_available)
scontrol_string = scontrol + \
' update reservationname=licenses_' + vendor + \
' licenses=' + slurm_licence_available_string
if args.initialise:
print(slurm_licence_total_string)
continue
if args.dryrun:
print(scontrol_string)
continue
# Actually update the reservation
os.system(scontrol_string)
# Strings used for testing
#
#string = 'Users of MATLAB_Distrib_Comp_Engine: (Total of 16 licenses issued;
Total of 0 licenses in use)'
#string = 'Users of Wavelet_Toolbox: (Error: 2 licenses, unsupported by
licensed server)'
---
--
Dr. Loris Bennett (Mr.)
ZEDAT, Freie Universität Berlin Email loris.benn...@fu-berlin.de
conf.
>
> So is restarting slurmctld the only way to let it pick up changes in
> slurm.conf?
No. You can also do
scontrol reconfigure
This does not restart slurmctld.
Cheers,
Loris
--
Dr. Loris Bennett (Mr.)
ZEDAT, Freie Universität Berlin Email loris.benn...@fu-berlin.de
which the licenses are defined. This is run
as a cron job once a minute. It's a bit of a kludge and obviously won't
work well if there is a lot of contention for licenses.
I can post the code if anyone is interested.
Cheers,
Loris
--
Dr. Loris Bennett (Mr.)
ZEDAT, Freie Universität Berlin Email loris.benn...@fu-berlin.de
scontrol: error: Invalid job ID 1135541,1135542
Is this a documentation error? Does the syntax work for more recent
versions?
--
Dr. Loris Bennett (Mr.)
ZEDAT, Freie Universität Berlin Email loris.benn...@fu-berlin.de
Hi,
If I try to set the number of licenses in a reservation to zero thus:
/usr/bin/scontrol update reservationname=licenses_matlab
licenses=matlab_MATLAB:0
I get the following:
Error updating the reservation: Invalid license specification
In my case it is not such a problem, as I am gen
"Loris Bennett"
writes:
> Hi,
>
> Is it possible to find jobs which both started and completed in a given
> interval?
>
> I am investigating an incident, during which an abnormally high load
> occurred on one of our storage servers. To this end I would like to
&
question.
Cheers,
Loris
--
Dr. Loris Bennett (Mr.)
ZEDAT, Freie Universität Berlin Email loris.benn...@fu-berlin.de
me thing like
mpirun -np ${SLURM_NTASKS} ./mm.o 6000
Cheers,
Loris
> regards,
>
> Husen
>
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 1:21 PM, Loris Bennett
> wrote:
>
> Husen R writes:
>
> > number of processes in slurm job
>
>
> >
>
eed to give more details about what you did. How did you set the
number of processes?
Cheers,
Loris
--
Dr. Loris Bennett (Mr.)
ZEDAT, Freie Universität Berlin Email loris.benn...@fu-berlin.de
Hi Chris,
Christopher Samuel
writes:
> On 30/06/16 17:37, Loris Bennett wrote:
>
>> With version slurm 15.08.8, the node-oriented output of 'sinfo' is not
>> longer aggregated. Instead I get a line for each node, even if the data
>> for multiple node
1 main* mixed 122:6:1 180000 1
ram24gb none
Is this a bug and, if so, has it already been fixed?
Cheers,
Loris
--
Dr. Loris Bennett (Mr.)
ZEDAT, Freie Universität Berlin Email loris.benn...@fu-berlin.de
"Loris Bennett"
writes:
> "Loris Bennett"
> writes:
>
>> Hi Roshan,
>>
>> Yes, you're right - this will work for us. So the update tweaks the
>> number of licences available and presumably extends the reservation by
>> anot
"Loris Bennett"
writes:
> Hi Roshan,
>
> Yes, you're right - this will work for us. So the update tweaks the
> number of licences available and presumably extends the reservation by
> another 30 sec, so that you have essentially an infinite reservation
>
e
"The system resource may not require an actual license for use, but
Slurm licenses can be used to prevent jobs *needing* the resource from
being started when that resource is unavailable."
Cheers,
Loris
--
Dr. Loris Bennett (Mr.)
ZEDAT, Freie Universität Berlin Em
er on the used licenses.
>
> I believe this should work for you?
>
> Best regards,
> Roshan
>
> On 17 June 2016 at 11:12, Loris Bennett
> wrote:
>
> Hi Roshan,
>
> Thanks for the link - I hadn't spotted that. However, using
>
n on the current availability of licenses
> and will only start a job when the requested no. of licenses
> available.
>
> Cheers,
> Roshan
>
> On 17 June 2016 at 09:44, Loris Bennett
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am looking into configuring Slurm to use ou
. Loris Bennett (Mr.)
ZEDAT, Freie Universität Berlin Email loris.benn...@fu-berlin.de
larger value, but
wouldn't it make more sense if the run-time for the job only started to
accumulate, once the slurmd on the node became available?
Cheers,
Loris
--
Dr. Loris Bennett (Mr.)
ZEDAT, Freie Universität Berlin Email loris.benn...@fu-berlin.de
//unicode.org/faq/normalization.html
Thanks for carrying this forward.
Regarding the normalisation, in out case, this is not an issue. We get
our account information from the university's central identity
management system, in which account names can only contain alphanumeric
ASCII character
with status "RUNNING" which no longer exists), and not for
deleting jobs completely, but it might help:
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/slurm-devel/nf7JxV91F40/KUsS1AmyWRYJ
Cheers,
Loris
--
Dr. Loris Bennett (Mr.)
ZEDAT, Freie Universität Berlin Email loris.benn...@fu-berlin.de
tically.
Cheers,
Loris
> Cheers,
> Miguel
>> On 24 May 2016, at 08:46, Loris Bennett wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> The 'Reason' field for a pending job has changed from 'Priority' to
>> 'BadConstraints'. This seems to be becaus
able. Just image
Italian had become the dominant language in the USA instead of English -
Slurm might think your name is "Gari Brovvn".
In fact, I would prefer incorrect justification with umlauts to correct
justification without umlauts.
[snip (57 lines)]
Cheers,
Loris
--
Dr
Janne Blomqvist writes:
> On 2016-06-01 15:25, Loris Bennett wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> With Slurm 15.08.8, sreport does not handle non-ASCII characters in the
>> 'Proper Name' column properly:
>>
>> Top 3 Users 2016-05-31T00:00:00 - 2
ed. Duplicate node names in the list will be
ignored. The order of the node names in the list is not
important; the node names will be sorted by Slurm.
Cheers,
Loris
--
Dr. Loris Bennett (Mr.)
ZEDAT, Freie Universität Berlin Email loris.benn...@fu-berlin.de
to the final line of data have an additional space at
the end of the line.
The terminal space is not much of a problem, but it would be nice if
justification problem could be fixed.
Cheers,
Loris
--
Dr. Loris Bennett (Mr.)
ZEDAT, Freie Universität Berlin Email loris.benn...@fu-berlin.de
in this
state before this period.
Cheers,
Loris
> Thank you in advance.
>
> Regards,
> Husen
[snip (33 lines)]
--
Dr. Loris Bennett (Mr.)
ZEDAT, Freie Universität Berlin Email loris.benn...@fu-berlin.de
eivable that
you are being bitten by a probably long-fixed bug.
Cheers,
Loris
--
Dr. Loris Bennett (Mr.)
ZEDAT, Freie Universität Berlin Email loris.benn...@fu-berlin.de
ecifies the number of tasks required,
not specific nodes.
Shouldn't the scheduler just be able to replace the draining node with
another node in the projected node list? This is happening with version
15.08.8.
Cheers,
Loris
--
Dr. Loris Bennett (Mr.)
ZEDAT, Freie Universität Berlin Email loris.benn...@fu-berlin.de
Benjamin Redling
writes:
> On 05/17/2016 10:02, Loris Bennett wrote:
>>
>> Benjamin Redling
>> writes:
>>
>>> On 2016-05-13 05:58, Husen R wrote:
>>>> Does slurm provide feature to get command that being executed/will be
>>>> execu
1 - 100 of 210 matches
Mail list logo
