I have two process types - a Master and a number of
Slaves.
A Slave's lifecycle looks like this.
It is born, registers with it's Master (via SOAP),
sit's around ready to respond to it's Master's bidding
for a while, (bidding will arrive as a SOAP RMI), then
deregisters from Master (via SOAP)
Hi!
Try putting a TcpTunnel between your client and your server to see what
they are exchanging.
Steeve...
Ravindra Jain [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 01/08/2001 01:17:16 AM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:(bcc: Steeve Gilbert/G_STGEORGES/CANAM_MANAC)
Subject:
Can I use two different encodingStyles (Constants.NS_URI_SOAP_ENC and
Constants.NS_URI_LITERAL_XML)?
I'm currently using NS_URI_LITERAL_XML because I'm only sending XML messages
from client to server, but now I also want to send an attachment with the
XML message and from the mime example I see
Thanks, guess I read the Response class api doc page wrong.
Do you know if there's anyway to get a tagname wrapper around each string?,
like sa1 and sa2 here:
sa1 xsi:type=xsd:stringString1value/sa1
sa2 xsi:type=xsd:stringString2value/sa2
Thanks for your help!
You should be able to do what you want. I currently send parameters with one
encoding style(NS_URI_SOAP_ENC) and get back my response as an
org.w3c.dom.Element (NS_URI_LITERAL_XML).
For example: My client code looks like this:
// Sets the encoding style for the return.
That makes sense but I'm trying to send an attachment back from the server.
The client sends a message on NS_URI_LITERAL_XML encoding and the server
sends back a message with the same encoding + an attachment? Any ideas?
thanks
Gus
-Original Message-
From: Tolsch, Ed [mailto:[EMAIL
more than one for the result
-Original Message-
From: Tom Myers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2001 8:51 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: encodingStyles
At 07:54 AM 8/1/2001 -0500, Gus Delgado wrote:
Can I use two different
Hi Pete!
I think you'll be happy with this one. Add the [SoapRpcService()] before
your class and [SoapRpcMethod()] before your method and now they should add
the datatype in the soap response. That's what I did and it's working
great. The code looks like this...
namespace DotNetService
{
Steeve, my client gets the OrderEntry across SOAP to the server without
trouble. I was just wondering if my client could get the Response object
for the reply, and be able to parse the vector of parameter objects in the
Response object to get the parameter name/value pairs using
Steve, thanks for all your help.
Your solution does look good. The problem in my case is that I am only
writing the client. Someone else is writing the server side stuff. We used
the RPC method when we first started (before I hot to map the deserializers)
and I believe that wasn't an option
Yeah... I tried one time to have more then one parameters returns by a
method and get them thru Response.getParams() but I think this ain't
possible. Anyway if someone find out, please tell me. Oh well, then good
luck Paula!
Steeve...
Paula Young [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 01/08/2001 10:12:08
Unless I misunderstand, why don't you just return an object that contains
your strings as member fields? Give it public getters and setters, like a
Java bean, for each string. The XML will have the names in the element tag
for each string. You will need to register a serilaizer/deserializer for
Hi,
How can we restrict the client to use the same 'Call' Object over
and over for invoking different SOAP services that are deployed on a web
server? Is it by resetting the targetObjectURI and the method parameters
of that 'Call' Object? If this is the case then it is limitation to what
Does anyone know who provides a WSDL parser that is
either free and redistributable or open source? I am looking for a nice, clean
API to parse WSDL files and obtain meta data about web services. I looked at the
current CVS tree and couldn't locate one in the Apache SOAP library. IBM's is
Idoox provides WSDL API implementation as a part of
WASP Lite - (codename Stardust), that is free for commercial use (closed
source). Stardust will be released on Monday.
It will be available on our EAP site http://www.idoox.com/eap/index.html.
Cheers
Radovan Janecek
CTO, Idoox
-
Axis (http://xml.apache.org/axis), which should be having an alpha release
any day now, supports serializing/deserializing any combination of Lists and
Arrays, automatically converting as appropriate. The serialization ends up
as a standard SOAP Array, so you should have no problems
Thanks for the pointer, James! I was looking for this exact API and was
surprised that I haven't run across it yet. Google, XMLhack.com, xml.com,
and many other sites don't have anything pointing to it yet. The API looks
very solid and exactly what I was going to have to write.
The other links
Hi Soap Gurus
I am new to this field. I would be thankful if anybody could direct me
to some useful links/
or suggest some good books about SOAP. I am more interested in developing
C++ applications using SOAP
Thanks
Aniruddha
Hello
Has anybody worked with developing C++ servers which handle SOAP messages
with attatchment(s)
Any help/ suggestion would be appreciated
Thanks
Aniruddha
Thanks Matt.
Indeed, I was using tomcat's parser.jar. I needed to edit my tomcat.sh and
make
sure I put xerces.jar in front of the $TOMCAT_HOME/lib jars.
I made the mistake of just sourcing an environment file prior to starting
tomcat without
editing tomcat.sh directly.
Your tool was very
soap-user,
We have a scenario where a Apache SOAP Client is
talking to a non-Apache SOAP Server. The server
replies with a boolean value 1, i.e. true. An
example of the response is shown below:
SOAP-ENV:Body
xyzResponse
xyz xsi:type=xsd:boolean1/xyz
/xyzResponse
/SOAP-ENV:Body
Algirdas Veitas wrote:
soap-user,
We have a scenario where a Apache SOAP Client is
talking to a non-Apache SOAP Server. The server
replies with a boolean value 1, i.e. true. An
example of the response is shown below:
SOAP-ENV:Body
xyzResponse
xyz xsi:type=xsd:boolean1/xyz
22 matches
Mail list logo
