Thanks for the pointer, James! I was looking for this exact API and was
surprised that I haven't run across it yet. Google, XMLhack.com, xml.com,
and many other sites don't have anything pointing to it yet. The API looks
very solid and exactly what I was going to have to write.

The other links the various responses were interesting, but I didn't care
for the APIs. The closest API that I liked was Graham's Glue API for WSDL,
but his product is not distributable without licensing.

Hope this helps others looking for something similiar in the future.

James

----- Original Message -----
From: "James M Snell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2001 11:18 AM
Subject: Re: WSDL parser?


> There is also the WSDL4J project at developerWorks, which will eventually
> serve as the reference implementation for the WSDL JSR.
>
> - James Snell
>      Software Engineer, Emerging Technologies, IBM
>      James M Snell/Fresno/IBM - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>     "No, 'being created in God's image' does not mean I'll have this
> project done in seven days!" - Anon.
>
> Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To:     <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> cc:
> Subject:        Re: WSDL parser?
>
>
>
>
> Idoox provides WSDL API implementation as a part of  WASP Lite - (codename
> Stardust), that is free for commercial use (closed  source). Stardust will
> be released on Monday.
>
> It will be available on our EAP site http://www.idoox.com/eap/index.html.
>
> Cheers
>
> Radovan Janecek
> CTO, Idoox
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From:  James  Higginbotham
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2001 5:32  PM
> Subject: WSDL parser?
>
> Does anyone know who provides a WSDL parser that  is either free and
> redistributable or open source? I am looking for a nice,  clean API to
> parse WSDL files and obtain meta data about web services. I  looked at the
> current CVS tree and couldn't locate one in the Apache SOAP  library.
> IBM's is not redistributable and thus can't be used for commercial
> purposes - the parser seems to be stable, though.
>
> Any help would be appreciated.
>
> Regards,
> James
>
>
>

Reply via email to