the wool over your eyes,
interop is still a an issue.
Cheers
Simon
On Thu, 19 Jun 2003 16:27:21 -0700 (PDT), in soap you wrote:
Simon,
What kind of practical problems with doc/lit are there ? I would like to know..
thanks
Simon Fell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 18 Jun 2003 23:17:24 -0400
On Wed, 18 Jun 2003 23:17:24 -0400, in soap you wrote:
Doc/lit doesn't define type mappings, but it definitively specifies the
structure of the message via XML Schema. Because the two applications know
in advance exactly what the message structure is, the details of how the
SOAP message processor
I haven't looked at the code to see if this is there, but be aware
that sending a HTTP/1.1 request implies that you'll handle a response
that uses a chunked transfer-encoding.
Cheers
Simon
www.pocketsoap.com
On Tue, 18 Jun 2002 17:26:32 -0700, in soap you wrote:
Ok, I found that the post
On Sat, 15 Jun 2002 23:19:44 -0400, in soap you wrote:
Martin Gainty wrote:
Everyone who wants to sell their wares please dont waste my time
At the risk of soundling like a broken record
nobody has addressed the WSML for Unix..
Is there anyobody who can Focus on the problem ???
WSML is
On Sat, 27 Apr 2002 20:05:07 -0400, in soap you wrote:
My class method requires different encoding styles for each param. The
signature is:
public String Render(org.w3c.dom.Element source, String xsl_url)
I use an MSSOAP 2.2 client, building the envelope using the low-level API,
and this
One clarification .NET does support import, MSTK2.0 does not.
Cheers
Simon
www.pocketsoap.com
On Mon, 25 Feb 2002 22:36:31 -, in soap you wrote:
Yes.. you have to combine the three generated files into one.. i.e. .NET
can't handle the inport tags so you have to do the importing by hand.
On Mon, 18 Feb 2002 14:22:48 +0100, in soap you wrote:
This is the XML generated by Microsoft SOAP. There is no type definitiion for
parameter name!!!
?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8 standalone=no ?
SOAP-ENV:Envelope
SOAP-ENV:encodingStyle=http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/encoding/;
It will de-serialize them, but not serialize them.
Cheers
Simon
On Thu, 31 Jan 2002 10:16:46 +0200, in soap you wrote:
Hi all ,
First question: does apache soap handles circular refs?
why do I ask this. Because I have the following situation:
class car holds a ref to an order.
The order
Make sure your .NET proxy class thinks its doing section 5 encoding,
it sounds like its trying to do doc/literal.
The method in the proxy class should have a
System.Web.Services.Protocols.SoapRpcMethodAttribute attribute on it.
Cheers
Simon
www.pocketsoap.com
On Fri, 25 Jan 2002 09:25:04
your Apache endpoint to use the 2001 schema
version.
Cheers
Simon
On Fri, 25 Jan 2002 11:46:33 +0100, in soap you wrote:
Simon Fell wrote:
Make sure your .NET proxy class thinks its doing section 5 encoding,
it sounds like its trying to do doc/literal.
The method in the proxy class should
doc/literal and soap section 5 cover 99% of current usage [if not
more]
Cheers
Simon
On Thu, 24 Jan 2002 17:29:29 -0800, in soap you wrote:
Thanks. My question is if one wants to develop a SOAP toolkit, what are the
different encodings that we must consider ?
Regards,
Madhav
-Original
This turns out to be a bug in VectorSerializer, it never checks /
de-references the hrefs. I've attached a patch.
John, one final tweak you'll need to your pocketSOAP client code, is
when setting the brand property, to wrap the values in a CLng call, as
the Apache end doesn't do type promotions.
On Fri, 07 Dec 2001 10:08:53 -0700, in soap you wrote:
Is there a mailing list for Microsoft SOAP users?
Sorry to ask this on the Apache SOAP list. I have an
Apache SOAP server, but some of my client apps are
Microsoft SOAP, and I have some very specific interop
questions to ask that
On Mon, 26 Nov 2001 08:16:25 -0700, in soap you wrote:
How well does Apache SOAP attachments interop with
Microsoft's SOAP? Does anyone have experience sending
attachments between an Apache SOAP server and a MS SOAP
client? I'm interested in whether it's possible, and
what pitfalls I might
On Wed, 17 Oct 2001 09:01:01 -0700, in soap you wrote:
[Sorry for the repost from yesterday, not sure if nobody knows the answer, or whether
it was simply not received.]
I have a Java client (Apache SOAP 2.2) using JSSE 1.0.2 for HTTPS URLs to my web
service. The client is behind a proxy
Independent elements in SOAP [the one's that have id's] need to be
serialized outside of the main serialization root, e.g. they can not
be inlined, e.g.
s:Envelope
s:Body
m:doSomething
p1 href=#b /
p2 href=#b /
/m:doSomething
b id=b5/b
/s:Body
/e:Envelope
is correct, whilst this is not,
no, the child element is not in the MyNamespace namespace, it would
need to be prefixed with X (or someother prefix mapped to
MyNamespace), e.g.
X:parent xmlns:X=MyNamespace
X:childdata/X:child
/X:parent
But given a default namespace at a larger scope, child could be part
of the MyNamespace,
are fraught with peril .. what
happens to all the faults etc..
Sanjiva.
- Original Message -
From: Simon Fell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 29, 2001 12:56 AM
Subject: Re: Multiple invoke on one call
well, to be fair, SOAP v1.1 does not attempt to provide that, its
well, to be fair, SOAP v1.1 does not attempt to provide that, its
doesn't say you're not allowed to do it.
Cheers
Simon
On Thu, 28 Jun 2001 04:46:04 -0400, in soap you wrote:
No, you can't. SOAP v1.1 (which is what Apache SOAP implements)
does not permit that.
Sanjiva.
- Original Message
Hartmut,
is this on your w2k SP2 box ?, do you have another machine to try it
on ?
BTW, there's a dedicated pocketSOAP / 4s4c mailing list at
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/pocketSOAP
Cheers
Simon
On Wed, 27 Jun 2001 14:23:14 +0200, in soap you wrote:
Hello,
I am using 4S4C 1.3.3 from Simon
its required because
param1Hartmut Bernecker/param1 is not well formed XML and will
be rejected by the parser. the client parser should unescape it to
leave you with the original string (which doesn't appear to be
happening). It does appear that the source string is getting escaped
twice, don't
21 matches
Mail list logo
