RE: Performance problems

2002-03-08 Thread Colin Saxton
I have had these problems with SOAP2.2...I think that it is to do with the way the message is parsed in memory...To get round the problem we moved to using Axis which has all of the functionality that we are using in the Alpha version. -Original Message- From: Juan Gargiulo [mailto:[EMAIL

Re: Performance problems

2001-11-12 Thread Dirk-Willem van Gulik
Eh - no - most setups deal with some 10's of messages a second at the very least; esp. when the RTT is short. With longer round trip times and real long distatn conenctions you'd front it with apache anyway - so that offloading of the stack would again give you 10-100's of connectioons even on th

Re: Re: Performance problems

2001-11-12 Thread Radovan Janecek
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 9:09 PM Subject: RE: Re: Performance problems > Radovan, > > What was the size of your message? I've seen similar numbers with > very small message sizes (~.03KB). Have you done any testing with >

RE: Re: Performance problems

2001-11-12 Thread Chuck . King
g. Thanks, Chuck -Original Message- From: janecek Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 12:22 PM To: soap-user Cc: janecek Subject: Re: Performance problems Since I got some follow-up questions, I just want to say it more precisely: This number does not mean a throughput. It means a

Re: Performance problems

2001-11-12 Thread Radovan Janecek
- Original Message - From: "Serge Arsenault" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 8:50 PM Subject: RE: Performance problems > We cannot compare those 3 seconds with the 500 roundtrips per second. In the first case, the 3

RE: Performance problems

2001-11-12 Thread Serge Arsenault
___ Serge Arsenault -Original Message- From: Radovan Janecek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 1:22 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Performance problems Since I got some follow-up questions, I just want to say it more precisely: This number does

Re: Performance problems

2001-11-12 Thread Radovan Janecek
dovan Janecek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 2:10 PM Subject: Re: Performance problems > I meant 500 roundtrips. Client sends a request, server eats it and produces > response, client gets a response. > > R. > > -

RE: Performance problems

2001-11-12 Thread Anne Thomas Manes
vember 12, 2001 5:10 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Performance problems > > > I meant 500 roundtrips. Client sends a request, server eats it > and produces > response, client gets a response. > > R. > > - Original Message - > From: "

Re: Performance problems

2001-11-12 Thread Radovan Janecek
I meant 500 roundtrips. Client sends a request, server eats it and produces response, client gets a response. R. - Original Message - From: "William Brogden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 2:55 PM Subject: Re

Re: Performance problems

2001-11-12 Thread William Brogden
) > per second. > > Sincerely > > Radovan > > Radovan Janecek > VP, Engineering, Systinet (formerly Idoox) > http://www.systinet.com > > - Original Message - > From: "Ian Snead" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> &g

Re: Performance problems

2001-11-12 Thread Radovan Janecek
"Ian Snead" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 1:21 PM Subject: Re: Performance problems > > I'm a little confused. 3 seconds over HTTP is a > performance problem? Sounds about average to me, > especially with XML parsing

Re: Performance problems

2001-11-12 Thread Ian Snead
I'm a little confused. 3 seconds over HTTP is a performance problem? Sounds about average to me, especially with XML parsing involved at both ends...please correct me if this doesn't make sense. Anybody got a good reference URL to a digest of the SOAP performance debate? Cheers! Ian [EMAIL PRO