> The basic argument always seems to
> come down
> to "It's NOT Multiples and therefore is inferior".
Futaba were careful to build up the hype before launch, so their claims
invite scrutiny. Frankly the discussion on the 14MZ forum bordered on the
hysterical before the system was even launched.
orial Day weekend.
Al Battad - WH6VE
AMA #506981
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 27, 2005 3:54 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; soaring@airage.com; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [RCSE] 14MZ - A lot of reinvention o
In a message dated 5/27/2005 6:07:28 PM Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It is hardly the case that other companies are playing catch-up with Futaba.
Instead, it’s more the case that Futaba is now starting to play catch-up
with Multiplex.
_
>>The basic argument always seems to come down
>>to "It's NOT Multiples and therefore is inferior".
My guess is it's more like; "I'm ticked that MPX did it first but didn't get
the credit."
The pizza box bugged me too until I tried it twice in a row. Then it was a
non-issue. Also, an advantage i
Joedy Drulia wrote:
Another 'good' thing about EVERYBODY at the field using a 14MZ,
there'd be a lot fewer guys at the field, and a lot less >interferrence!
BUT, I'm envious. Sounds like the radio everyone needs. How long
before the other manufacturers catch up?
Bill,
It is hardly the
Another 'good' thing about EVERYBODY at the
field using a 14MZ, there'd be a lot fewer
guys at the field, and a lot
less >interferrence!
BUT, I'm envious. Sounds like the radio
everyone needs. How long before the other
manufacturers catch up?
Bill,
It is hardly the case that other comp
Another 'good' thing about EVERYBODY at the field using a 14MZ, there'd be
a lot fewer guys at the field, and a lot less >interferrence!
BUT, I'm envious. Sounds like the radio everyone needs. How long before
the other manufacturers catch up?
Bill,
It is hardly the case that other compani
7 matches
Mail list logo
