[RCSE] Evolution XL's FS

2006-05-01 Thread Mark Miller
Guys, Change in plans makes 2 Evolution XL's available. One is yellow top with blue tip swoosh and yellow with blue stripes on the bottom. The other is the same pattern but white tops with blue trim. Both are carbon D-Box wing layup. $1,300.00 plus shipping. You can get information on my website.

[RCSE] Evolution XL Announcement

2006-02-26 Thread Mark Miller
Guys, I am proud to announce that Isthmus Models has been named the exclusive importer for Paul Schneider Modellbau products into North and South America. Paul Schneider Modellbau just released an improved version of the popular Evolution called the Evolution XL. With more span and an airfoil bl

Re: [RCSE] Evolution of RC RF

2006-02-24 Thread Wwing
In a message dated 02/23/2006 11:28:34 PM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Now that governments have discovered that there's a cash cow to be milked auctioning off the spectrum -- one of the reasons for the move to digital TV is to free up half the old UHF TV band and the VHF T

Re: [RCSE] Evolution of RC RF

2006-02-24 Thread Bill's Email
Then I was given bad information which I repeated without confirming. My Bad. Bill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In a message dated 2/24/2006 8:24:46 A.M. Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Another little factoid about SS is that if you ever go out of range, your link is toa

Re: [RCSE] Evolution of RC RF

2006-02-24 Thread Raschow
In a message dated 2/24/2006 8:24:46 A.M. Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Another little factoid about SS is that if you ever go out of range, your link is toast. Once it is broken your TX and RX cannot reacquire it. Not so!  DX6 users have confirmed re-acquisition doe

Re: [RCSE] Evolution of RC RF

2006-02-24 Thread Bill's Email
Doug McLaren wrote: (I'm pretty sure that Futaba already sells industrial R/C equipment that uses spread spectrum, but I don't know the specifics.) Indeed they do: http://www.futaba.com/products/irc/introduction/index.asp There is no magic to this stuff and it is certainly not like the S

Re: [RCSE] Evolution of RC RF

2006-02-24 Thread Raschow
In a message dated 2/23/2006 8:13:11 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:  But it is clear that we need more power/range than what current 802.11x can offer.  Hence we will need to use another band and since we are peripheral RF users, being assigned more bandwidth or a new

Re: [RCSE] Evolution of RC RF

2006-02-23 Thread Doug McLaren
On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 08:42:32PM -0800, Martin Usher wrote: | >But it is clear that we need more power/range than what current | >802.11x can offer. For the record, 802.11x is just one (or a few, to be more accurate) implementations of spread spectrum. There are many others. The Spektrum stu

Re: [RCSE] Evolution of RC RF

2006-02-23 Thread Martin Usher
>But it is clear that we need more power/range than what current 802.11x can offer. Apart from range (limited) the real killer with something like 802.11 is latency. You probably won't notice it with just one or two people flying but if you had a contest with a couple of dozen then the transmi

Re: [RCSE] Evolution of RC RF

2006-02-23 Thread S Meyer
At 09:33 AM 2/23/2006, Bill Swingle wrote: Interesting idea Steve. I think I like it. However, SS may require more bandwidth than is available on 70ish MHz. Don't know... (hey Simon?) Besides that it would be a radical change and difficult to force down their throats. ;-) Narrow band was for

Re: [RCSE] Evolution of RC RF

2006-02-23 Thread Simon Van Leeuwen
Maybe John would care to give us an overview of what to expect from JR reegarding this very interesting prospect? Or maybe some snippets? :^) Bill Swingle wrote: Interesting idea Steve. I think I like it. However, SS may require more bandwidth than is available on 70ish MHz. Don't know... (hey

Re: [RCSE] Evolution of RC RF

2006-02-23 Thread Bill Swingle
Interesting idea Steve. I think I like it. However, SS may require more bandwidth than is available on 70ish MHz. Don't know... (hey Simon?) Besides that it would be a radical change and difficult to force down their throats. ;-) Bill Swingle Janesville, CA RCSE-List facilities provided by

[RCSE] Evolution of RC RF

2006-02-23 Thread S Meyer
Since this thread has drifted into the future of RC RF, how about this scenario. Eventually all the car guys will graduate to using 2.4G SS, (if not force them), thus allowing 75Mhz to be utilized for RC spread spectrum. Then allow the exclusive use to aircraft. If some old non compliant ca

[RCSE] Evolution NIB For Sale

2005-06-25 Thread mrmaserati
I am posting this for Steve Martinez. If interested please contact Steve at his phone as listed below. Dave would you be so kind as to post this on the RCSE for me. Thanks, Steve N.I.B. Evolution for sale. This is a 'light' version ( not a full carbon wing lay-up) that is fully F3J capable

[RCSE] Evolution

2004-11-16 Thread Rense
Just received my Evolution order from Picolario-usa (Hartmut Claus). Wow: very high quality, shiny, very strong, and mighty good looking. All the parts fit, and very little sanding will be necessary to get things together. Better hurry, I cannot wait to go flying.   Rense Lange