[RCSE] RCGroups withdrawals and signal to noise ratio...

2005-02-27 Thread Jay Decker
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Brian Courtice [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My own primary soaring interest is slope. The slope forum on R/C Groups is hands down the best on the net. Lot's of new posts everyday, with detailed build threads, construction techniques, photos, videos, site information, etc.

Re: [RCSE] RCGroups withdrawals and signal to noise ratio...

2005-02-27 Thread Doug McLaren
On Sun, Feb 27, 2005 at 04:15:52PM -0800, Jay Decker wrote: | I agree. However, the signal to noise ratio has slipped | significantly last year... which makes me wonder where the next good | place to hangout on the net for good content will be? Or, maybe they | administrators and moderators will

Re: [RCSE] RCGroups withdrawals and signal to noise ratio...

2005-02-27 Thread Steve Lange
Jay Decker wrote: I agree. However, the signal to noise ratio has slipped significantly last year... which makes me wonder where the next good place to hangout on the net for good content will be? Or, maybe they administrators and moderators will find a way to redirect of the chit-chat... As one

Re: [RCSE] RCGroups withdrawals and signal to noise ratio...

2005-02-27 Thread Jay Decker
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Steve Lange [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I suggest that those complaining about the signal:noise ratio on RCGroups get to work generating some signal. Otherwise it's just more noise. Steve I appologize if my comment offended you. When people exchange opinions, their

Re: [RCSE] RCGroups withdrawals and signal to noise ratio...

2005-02-27 Thread Steve Lange
Jay Decker wrote: Steve I appologize if my comment offended you. When people exchange opinions, their views will sometimes clash. It is my opinion that if the signal to noise ratio is not addressed, eventually, some folks will stop reading and contributing, e.g., providing Rodent dimensions to