Re: [RCSE] winners fly against winners

1999-08-10 Thread Chuck Anderson
At 04:23 PM 8/10/1999 -0600, you wrote: > > >Wondering why me??? Jim > >PS - I offered to look at implementing WFAW because I have had several requests >for the format - not my personal preference - but considering that this luck >factor may actually give me a chance to beat you - as official sco

Re: [RCSE] winners fly against winners

1999-08-10 Thread Charles Miller
hi guys!! it does seem kinda silly how things work with formating contest's. seems like no body is happy.. i like the randon man on man, that keeps eveyone flying against everyone. then the question is? when they normalize for class how come when you move up a class, you can't take your points?

Re: [RCSE] winners fly against winners

1999-08-10 Thread jmmonaco
Yes Mark, I am reading this - and I suppose that the reason you are addressing this to me is: a) not from the aspect of my ever having run such a format, since I have not, b) not because I have advocated such a format, since I do not c) not because as an RMSA CD I might choose such a format, si

[RCSE] winners fly against winners

1999-08-10 Thread Mark Howard
Sorry I just can't stay silent any longer. Over the years I've seen a lot of CD's try many different (and some unusual) formats in the interest of "even-ing out the field" or "de-emphasizing the landing" or some other choice piece of bull crap that they invent to pleasure themselves. The guys who