Hi
There is also :
- Arc9 - http://www.arc9.com/
- FTrack (Ftrack review and client protal) - https://www.ftrack.com/
Cheers,
Greg
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 10:10 AM, Marc-Andre Carbonneau <
marc-andre.carbonn...@ubisoft.com> wrote:
> That’s interesting… thanks
>
>
>
> *From:* softimage
Hi Greg,
There is no build-in support for Softimage inside FTrack.
The user interface of FTrack is way better in my point of view, but there
is still some missing elements...
But it is not hard to build one on your own...
Cheers,
Greg
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 11:31 AM, Greg Punchatz wrote:
>
hatever the new release
> will be called and Octane on the GPU side (which I am quite enjoying after
> finding a smooth way to get the Alembics out of Softimage with no issues.)
>
> With our enforced move to Maya next year this becomes a little easier as
> Maya for Renderman is pretty sol
Hi Angus,
3Delight RIBs are in theory compatible with RenderMan RIBs since they are
both using the same RISpec (http://renderman.pixar.com/view/rispec).
But that is pretty much the end of the compatibility...
In order to render a RIB properly, you will need to convert the shader from
the Softimage
Hi Sebastian,
I just added this new category.
Cheers,
Greg
-Original Message-
From: "Sebastien Sterling"
Sent: 2013-10-11 19:03
To: "softimage@listproc.autodesk.com"
Subject: Re: Unofficial Softimage user voice
I am surprised there isn't a rigging section in the idea categories, s
for "Small annoying things".
Thanks,
Greg
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 9:30 AM, Eugen Sares wrote:
> Gregory,
> how about adding an "SDK" section?
> Btw. there's a typo in "How can Softimage be improve?"...
> Thanks for the initiative!
>
>
> Am
Hi,
First of all, I just double check if there was any voting abuse during
the first hours when the site was setup to an unlimited voting
measure. And no, people were not abusive...
Now it is 20 votes/users, I am trying to see how AD can provide
feedback regarding the status of a suggestion in or
oc.autodesk.com"
Subject: Re: Unofficial Softimage user voice
Truly a very good imitative :)
However (and this is only sickling) but, why call it unofficial ? is there an
"official softimage user voice" somewhere we don't knowz ?
On 5 October 2013 14:08, Gregory Ducatel wrote
Subject: Re: Unofficial Softimage user voice
I too think this is cool, i hope someone can forward it on to the right people
:P
On 5 October 2013 10:44, Toonafish wrote:
Great initiative, let's hope AD takes notice. Just added an idea to the
list, time to sacrifice some small animals.
Thank you for the advice. It will be remove.
Cheers,
Greg
On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 2:15 PM, Cristobal Infante wrote:
> Hi Gregory,
>
> Good work, I recommend you don't use the official softimage logo. It's
> probably infringing copyright..
>
>
> On Friday, 4 Octo
Chris
>>
>> On 4 Oct, 2013, at 11:23 PM, Gregory Ducatel wrote:
>>
>> > Hi Guys,
>> >
>> > In order to centralise ideas, features... In one place I have opened
>> > an unofficial Softimage user voice.
>> >
>> > https://softimage.us
ser voice?
And I was able to vote as anonymous.
Thanks
Stephen
On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 11:23 AM, Gregory Ducatel wrote:
Hi Guys,
In order to centralise ideas, features... In one place I have opened
an unofficial Softimage user voice.
https://softimage.uservoice.com/
Please fell free to a
Hi Guys,
In order to centralise ideas, features... In one place I have opened
an unofficial Softimage user voice.
https://softimage.uservoice.com/
Please fell free to add any ideas, features or improvements that pop
in your mind I will be glad to spam Autodesk using this platform.
Cheers,
Greg
re, but towards how it is presented by AD.
> So when you have user base that feels so strongly about their software and
> feels like having part of them self's ripped from them.. what does it says
> about that particular software? is that really hard to understand?
>
>
> On Mon, Se
Honestly I do respect a lot Luc-Eric, but he cannot know AD's almighty plan
for Softimage and they can kill it tomorrow...
I do not care that much since I do not control that part.
But one thing for sure, as long as they make money with it Softimage will
still work on it and each time you are actin
It is an easy and understandable act/action... But it just don't help.
What do you think student learning Softimage, 3rd developers, Studio think
about this community when they silently sign in and just keep reading (and
not actively posting)? Do they wish to support this community or joining
the
Every AD developer do not "have" to take part of any discussion here...
You should in fact assume that they are reading your joyful messages as
many non active users (including myself), 3rd party developer, students...
All this generates more damage to Softimage than anything AD did or did not
do o
Funny once again a positive thread that become negative... Can we stop that
mentality for a change?
I love Softimage but you guys are killing the spirit and potentially the
software with this attitude...
You want a developer to be on that list? Come on guy there is no way an AD
developer will enjo
Here is a quick update regarding the hair/fur...
http://vimeo.com/67238243
Only 1 million hair on my laptop, the draw back is that Softimage is slow
to export that many hair strand... On my workstation I was able to perform
the same test with 20 millions hair strands.
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at
opher <
christop...@thecreativesheep.ca> wrote:
> I got to watch it :) :)
>
> ::Christopher
>
>
> Rob Wuijster wrote:
>
> video has been deleted?
>
> Rob
>
> \/-----\/--------\/
>
> On 29-5-2013 4:16, Gregory Ducatel wrote:
>
Hi,
Sorry for the late reply...
So since even in better resolution it is hard to read the setting panel, I
have done an extra video: http://vimeo.com/67174304 just to show the
settings for that scene.
Regarding my configuration I am running a Windows 7 SP1 with 24 GB of
memory and 12 Cores (2 x I
Hi Guys,
In case you did not had a chance to look into the next version of 3dfs,
here is a little test I did.
http://vimeo.com/66105781
Cheers,
Greg
22 matches
Mail list logo
